Local: Los Angeles, CA  (change)

 | 

Join the Topix community today: 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment
Roman Catholic Church

May 23, 2008

Pope John Paul II 'beatified by spring 2009'

The prediction was made by Monsignor Slawomir Oder, the Polish priest who is in charge of arguing John Paul's case for sainthood.

Read All 10 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 10 of 10
Minnesota Mary
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
May 24, 2008
 
There are other popes that were just as holy or holier than JP II who haven't yet been canonized. I think JP II should wait his turn until his holy predecessors have been declared saints. Why the rush?
Hector
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
May 24, 2008
 
Film, Wag the Dog comes to mind in this move to canonize JP11. Catholics worldwide will be distracted from the clergy scandal and tend to focus on this current event. Who ever said the Vatican wasn't savvy with PR calculations.
As for the actual merit of this canonization, I don't think so.

“God is love.”

Joined: Mar 9, 2007
Comments: 1256
Central Texas
ISP Location: Gonzales, TX
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
May 24, 2008
 
May John Paul II be set on the fast track like Mother Teresa.

Hector, the pope has addressed, and addressed, and addressed the clergy scandal. Were you awake when he made his visit to America? Even the secular media acknowledged his multiple addressing of the issue and... they even were able to move on for a while.

Why not you? A perpetual axe to grind?

We need saints for this age. God speed the canonization of John Paul the Great.
Minnesota Mary
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
May 25, 2008
 
liseux wrote:
May John Paul II be set on the fast track like Mother Teresa.
Hector, the pope has addressed, and addressed, and addressed the clergy scandal. Were you awake when he made his visit to America? Even the secular media acknowledged his multiple addressing of the issue and... they even were able to move on for a while.
Why not you? A perpetual axe to grind?
We need saints for this age. God speed the canonization of John Paul the Great.
Greetings Liseux! I can't agree that putting JP II on the fast track to sainthood, or Mother Teresa for that matter, is a good thing. The Church wisely put up many years of time for study and revelations to occur about prior saints to pass before canonization. I consider a rushed canonization to be as big a mistake as the rush to war in Iraq. The Vatican has always been slow to move on just about everything. This rush to judgment has me concerned. For one thing a lot of bad appointments were made by JP II and a lot of terrible things took place in the Church during his watch. We need to stand back and take a long hard look at his papacy.

Dominus vobiscum. Mary

“Christ Our Hope”

Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Comments: 5038
ISP Location: AOL
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
May 25, 2008
 
Minnesota Mary wrote:
<quoted text>
Greetings Liseux! I can't agree that putting JP II on the fast track to sainthood, or Mother Teresa for that matter, is a good thing. The Church wisely put up many years of time for study and revelations to occur about prior saints to pass before canonization. I consider a rushed canonization to be as big a mistake as the rush to war in Iraq. The Vatican has always been slow to move on just about everything. This rush to judgment has me concerned. For one thing a lot of bad appointments were made by JP II and a lot of terrible things took place in the Church during his watch. We need to stand back and take a long hard look at his papacy.
Dominus vobiscum. Mary
Hi Mary,
When I read your first post on thist topic, I didn't know whether I agreed or not. I was leaning towards agreeing with you, but this post definitely has me agreeing. Although I don't know as much about his papacy in terms of bad appointments as you seem to, I do have to agree with you. With regard to Mother Teresa now, I don't know yet, but she has had doubts about God for a long time, but many of the Saints suffered that, but I don't know if the length of time was as long as hers seem to have been, but then again, I don't know exactly how long she suffered doubts either, but I think I heard it was after she started her work in Calcutta. I am a more concerned about Pope John Paul II being canonized so soon.
Minnesota Mary
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
May 25, 2008
 
MichelleMC wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi Mary,
When I read your first post on thist topic, I didn't know whether I agreed or not. I was leaning towards agreeing with you, but this post definitely has me agreeing. Although I don't know as much about his papacy in terms of bad appointments as you seem to, I do have to agree with you. With regard to Mother Teresa now, I don't know yet, but she has had doubts about God for a long time, but many of the Saints suffered that, but I don't know if the length of time was as long as hers seem to have been, but then again, I don't know exactly how long she suffered doubts either, but I think I heard it was after she started her work in Calcutta. I am a more concerned about Pope John Paul II being canonized so soon.
Hi Michelle!

"There's many a slip twixt the cup and the lip."

We may find that the fast track to canonization for both JP II and Mother Teresa gets slowed down considerably.

The Church in the past waited a good length of time after the death of someone proposed for canonization in order to give enough time for all information to come out and be revealed. If the Church were to canonize JP II or Mother Teresa in a rush and then find out later that credible information surfaces, that would have stopped the canonization process, it would be a huge embarrassment for the Church. That being said, because Christ gave the keys to the kingdom of heaven to Peter and his successors, if the Pope declares JP II and Mother Teresa to be saints, then they would be upon the moment the words are uttered from the Chair of Peter.

Dominus vobiscum. Mary

“Christ Our Hope”

Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Comments: 5038
ISP Location: AOL
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
May 25, 2008
 
Minnesota Mary wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi Michelle!
"There's many a slip twixt the cup and the lip."
We may find that the fast track to canonization for both JP II and Mother Teresa gets slowed down considerably.
The Church in the past waited a good length of time after the death of someone proposed for canonization in order to give enough time for all information to come out and be revealed. If the Church were to canonize JP II or Mother Teresa in a rush and then find out later that credible information surfaces, that would have stopped the canonization process, it would be a huge embarrassment for the Church. That being said, because Christ gave the keys to the kingdom of heaven to Peter and his successors, if the Pope declares JP II and Mother Teresa to be saints, then they would be upon the moment the words are uttered from the Chair of Peter.
Dominus vobiscum. Mary
Mary,
Speaking of the canonization process, do you know how long it took St. Augustine to be canonized? He is being torn up in shreds on another topic(which you advised I stay away from), and I am not sure how to find out information on how long it took. The reason they are tearing him up on there is because they said he agreed with killing "heretics", which I'm not sure about any of that either, so I can't defend. I guess I can google him and see what I come up with.
I would love to get through to these people so that they will think that MAYBE(we know it is) the Catholic Church is the one true, wonderful Church. That's why I stay on there. I believe that as long as one is living and breathing, there is always hope for them to convert, but I'm starting to wonder on this thread now. Do you remember what thread I'm talking about?
Hector
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
May 25, 2008
 
liseux wrote:
May John Paul II be set on the fast track like Mother Teresa.
Hector, the pope has addressed, and addressed, and addressed the clergy scandal. Were you awake when he made his visit to America? Even the secular media acknowledged his multiple addressing of the issue and... they even were able to move on for a while.
Why not you? A perpetual axe to grind?
We need saints for this age. God speed the canonization of John Paul the Great.
We are all entitled to our opinion and until I see something more substantive in the way of action, I stand by every word I've said, in this and all previous posts. I'm from NY, street-wise, and not easily fooled by anyone, Pope or pauper.
Minnesota Mary
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
May 25, 2008
 
MichelleMC wrote:
<quoted text>
Mary,
Speaking of the canonization process, do you know how long it took St. Augustine to be canonized? He is being torn up in shreds on another topic(which you advised I stay away from), and I am not sure how to find out information on how long it took. The reason they are tearing him up on there is because they said he agreed with killing "heretics", which I'm not sure about any of that either, so I can't defend. I guess I can google him and see what I come up with.
I would love to get through to these people so that they will think that MAYBE(we know it is) the Catholic Church is the one true, wonderful Church. That's why I stay on there. I believe that as long as one is living and breathing, there is always hope for them to convert, but I'm starting to wonder on this thread now. Do you remember what thread I'm talking about?
Michelle, I don't recall the other thread you mention. St. Augustine was a brilliant man, and he did not suffer fools gladly. The same can be said of Padre Pio and other saints.

Don't fret about getting through to people on these threads. Once we put forth the truth of the Catholic Church with back-up from the scriptures, tradition, and the history of Christianity only the intellectually dishonest will continue to lie about the Catholic Church. Those who are obstinate in lying about the Church are flirting with the unforgiveable sin.

Have a nice Memorial Day tomorrow. Mary

“Christ Our Hope”

Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Comments: 5038
ISP Location: Burgaw, NC
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
May 25, 2008
 
Minnesota Mary wrote:
<quoted text>
Michelle, I don't recall the other thread you mention. St. Augustine was a brilliant man, and he did not suffer fools gladly. The same can be said of Padre Pio and other saints.
Don't fret about getting through to people on these threads. Once we put forth the truth of the Catholic Church with back-up from the scriptures, tradition, and the history of Christianity only the intellectually dishonest will continue to lie about the Catholic Church. Those who are obstinate in lying about the Church are flirting with the unforgiveable sin.
Have a nice Memorial Day tomorrow. Mary
Thank you for your post, Mary. I'll be working tomorrow(rolls eyes). You enjoy your day tomorrow.
Showing posts 1 - 10 of 10
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Roman Catholic Church Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
What Divides Catholics and Protestants? 5 min All for the ... 21981
Catholic Church Waging War on Women and Gays (from Oct '07) 5 min Estelle 35105
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (from Jul '07) 9 min gene d 43670
Harlem Pastor Faces New Allegations Of Sex Abuse 9 min harlemboy 12
Peter W. Innes v. Maria Jose Carrascosa (from Apr '07) 10 min AXJ-Santa Fe 3170
Continuing the Catholic Anti-Pagan Pile-On (from Feb '08) 12 min wykkan 1166
Who Is Allah? (from Aug '07) 12 min Prophet Afte... 11061
Related Topix Forums: Religion