Renowned Tibetologist condemns self-immolations

If China is bringing Chinese people into Tibet and pushing the Tibetians out of house; whatelse they can do.

Most of them live in tents; some of them ran away to other countries.

Evil Buddhism from CHina is destroying the Original Buddhism with the help of other Evil Buddhisms from Sri Lanka, Burma and Pakistan Muslims.

CHina must quit Tibet immediately and let the Lord Buddha's people to live in PEACE.

RohanX wrote:

If China is bringing Chinese people into Tibet and pushing the Tibetians out of house; whatelse they can do.
Most of them live in tents; some of them ran away to other countries.
Evil Buddhism from CHina is destroying the Original Buddhism with the help of other Evil Buddhisms from Sri Lanka, Burma and Pakistan Muslims.
CHina must quit Tibet immediately and let the Lord Buddha's people to live in PEACE.

Rohan I know you are an diehard Indian living in New Zealand. Why post so many lies to fool?

No one likes a loudmouth Indian...

but then is anyone shocked that a Indian would side with Tibetan monks who were slave owners... and molesters of 9 year old boys????

yes they treated their Tibetan slaves so well their average age expectancy was 35 years of age...

the sons of the Tibetan Elite and Monks tried to take back Tibet a long time ago...

but then the average Tibetan did not join them in their fight...I guess they were tired of being slaves and having their children molested

type in the "Real Tibet" if you folks dont believe me...

When you see big, strong and long thing; then would you like small and soft?

China Vs India

RohanX wrote:

If China is bringing Chinese people into Tibet and pushing the Tibetians out of house; whatelse they can do.
Most of them live in tents; some of them ran away to other countries.
Evil Buddhism from CHina is destroying the Original Buddhism with the help of other Evil Buddhisms from Sri Lanka, Burma and Pakistan Muslims.
CHina must quit Tibet immediately and let the Lord Buddha's people to live in PEACE.

Let the Creator of the Universe and the Creator of Lord Buddha come into the hearts of every Tibetan and every Indian.

RohanX wrote:

When you see big, strong and long thing; then would you like small and soft?
China Vs India

Friday, 8 December 2006, 13:08 GMT

Condoms 'too big' for Indian men
By Damian Grammaticus
BBC News, Delhi


There is a "lack of awareness" over condom sizes
A survey of more than 1,000 men in India has concluded that condoms made according to international sizes are too large for a majority of Indian men.

The study found that more than half of the men measured had penises that were shorter than international standards for condoms.

It has led to a call for condoms of mixed sizes to be made more widely available in India.

The two-year study was carried out by the Indian Council of Medical Research.

Over 1,200 volunteers from the length and breadth of the country had their penises measured precisely, down to the last millimetre.

The scientists even checked their sample was representative of India as a whole in terms of class, religion and urban and rural dwellers.

It's not size, it's what you do with it that matters

Sunil Mehra
The conclusion of all this scientific endeavour is that about 60% of Indian men have penises which are between three and five centimetres shorter than international standards used in condom manufacture.

Doctor Chander Puri, a specialist in reproductive health at the Indian Council of Medical Research, told the BBC there was an obvious need in India for custom-made condoms, as most of those currently on sale are too large.

The issue is serious because about one in every five times a condom is used in India it either falls off or tears, an extremely high failure rate.

And the country already has the highest number of HIV infections of any nation.

'Not a problem'

Mr Puri said that since Indians would be embarrassed about going to a chemist to ask for smaller condoms there should be vending machines dispensing different sizes all around the country.

"Smaller condoms are on sale in India. But there is a lack of awareness that different sizes are available. There is anxiety talking about the issue. And normally one feels shy to go to a chemist's shop and ask for a smaller size condom."

But Indian men need not be concerned about measuring up internationally according to Sunil Mehra, the former editor of the Indian version of the men's magazine Maxim.

"It's not size, it's what you do with it that matters," he said.

"From our population, the evidence is Indians are doing pretty well.

"With apologies to the poet Alexander Pope, you could say, for inches and centimetres, let fools contend."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6161691...

1 QUADRILLION BANK BETS wrote:

<quoted text>
Friday, 8 December 2006, 13:08 GMT
Condoms 'too big' for Indian men
By Damian Grammaticus
BBC News, Delhi
There is a "lack of awareness" over condom sizes
A survey of more than 1,000 men in India has concluded that condoms made according to international sizes are too large for a majority of Indian men.
The study found that more than half of the men measured had penises that were shorter than international standards for condoms.
It has led to a call for condoms of mixed sizes to be made more widely available in India.
The two-year study was carried out by the Indian Council of Medical Research.
Over 1,200 volunteers from the length and breadth of the country had their penises measured precisely, down to the last millimetre.
The scientists even checked their sample was representative of India as a whole in terms of class, religion and urban and rural dwellers.
It's not size, it's what you do with it that matters
Sunil Mehra
The conclusion of all this scientific endeavour is that about 60% of Indian men have penises which are between three and five centimetres shorter than international standards used in condom manufacture.
Doctor Chander Puri, a specialist in reproductive health at the Indian Council of Medical Research, told the BBC there was an obvious need in India for custom-made condoms, as most of those currently on sale are too large.
The issue is serious because about one in every five times a condom is used in India it either falls off or tears, an extremely high failure rate.
And the country already has the highest number of HIV infections of any nation.
'Not a problem'
Mr Puri said that since Indians would be embarrassed about going to a chemist to ask for smaller condoms there should be vending machines dispensing different sizes all around the country.
"Smaller condoms are on sale in India. But there is a lack of awareness that different sizes are available. There is anxiety talking about the issue. And normally one feels shy to go to a chemist's shop and ask for a smaller size condom."
But Indian men need not be concerned about measuring up internationally according to Sunil Mehra, the former editor of the Indian version of the men's magazine Maxim.
"It's not size, it's what you do with it that matters," he said.
"From our population, the evidence is Indians are doing pretty well.
"With apologies to the poet Alexander Pope, you could say, for inches and centimetres, let fools contend."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6161691...

Interesting post.

Now the renouned Tibetologist has something he did not know before and will have to learn to illuminate his brain, eyes or his thing.

1 QUADRILLION BANK BETS wrote:

<quoted text>
Friday, 8 December 2006, 13:08 GMT
Condoms 'too big' for Indian men
By Damian Grammaticus
BBC News, Delhi
There is a "lack of awareness" over condom sizes
A survey of more than 1,000 men in India has concluded that condoms made according to international sizes are too large for a majority of Indian men.
The study found that more than half of the men measured had penises that were shorter than international standards for condoms.
It has led to a call for condoms of mixed sizes to be made more widely available in India.
The two-year study was carried out by the Indian Council of Medical Research.
Over 1,200 volunteers from the length and breadth of the country had their penises measured precisely, down to the last millimetre.
The scientists even checked their sample was representative of India as a whole in terms of class, religion and urban and rural dwellers.
It's not size, it's what you do with it that matters
Sunil Mehra
The conclusion of all this scientific endeavour is that about 60% of Indian men have penises which are between three and five centimetres shorter than international standards used in condom manufacture.
Doctor Chander Puri, a specialist in reproductive health at the Indian Council of Medical Research, told the BBC there was an obvious need in India for custom-made condoms, as most of those currently on sale are too large.
The issue is serious because about one in every five times a condom is used in India it either falls off or tears, an extremely high failure rate.
And the country already has the highest number of HIV infections of any nation.
'Not a problem'
Mr Puri said that since Indians would be embarrassed about going to a chemist to ask for smaller condoms there should be vending machines dispensing different sizes all around the country.
"Smaller condoms are on sale in India. But there is a lack of awareness that different sizes are available. There is anxiety talking about the issue. And normally one feels shy to go to a chemist's shop and ask for a smaller size condom."
But Indian men need not be concerned about measuring up internationally according to Sunil Mehra, the former editor of the Indian version of the men's magazine Maxim.
"It's not size, it's what you do with it that matters," he said.
"From our population, the evidence is Indians are doing pretty well.
"With apologies to the poet Alexander Pope, you could say, for inches and centimetres, let fools contend."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6161691...

Those Indians must be born to white masters or chinese slaves.

1 QUADRILLION BANK BETS wrote:

<quoted text>
they are still loudmouth Indians like you...
btw
everytime I ask these questions Tibetologist like you run away...
could you give us your views on Tibetans treatment (riots, killings etc) towards another minority Hui Muslims,
and Dalai Lama own religious persecution of one of his own religious factions Dorje Shugden ...
or The Dalai Lama has admitted to the New York Times that he led an armed terrorist organization for a number of years until the mid 1970’s.
or
The Dalai Lama claims he is a holy man, but how did he get that title? He got it from the previous Dalai
Lama, a brutal slave owner, who corresponded with Adoph Hitler and praised Hitler. Hitler and the head of the Nazi

FYI,...

Lord Buddha was from Mongolian Ancestry. He did not like the Aryan(Nazzi Mindset) Caste System and Superiority among Aryans and Indo-Aryans(Aryan+Dravidian mix) people against the Indigenous Dravidian people(Dark/native Skin).

BUT, after Lord Buddha's Demise, the same Indo-Aryans from Mongolian/Han Clan created the Religion Buddhism. Aryan/Indo-Aryan Buddhism has the same 'Nazzi' Mindset which encourages Caste System and have a hidden agenda to genocide the Indigenous people.

That Indo-Aryan/Aryan Agenda outcaste/d the Indigenous People as 'Low caste' and untouchables(just because they have dark skin and their women never slept with Aryans/Arabians/Chinese or even Russians from North(devas))

We call all the Buddhisms from all over the world except Tibet as Evils. Only Tibetian Buddhism is the best evil among those dirty evils.

So, let the Tibet Buddhism to survive.

Andrez Lopez wrote:

<quoted text>
Let the Creator of the Universe and the Creator of Lord Buddha come into the hearts of every Tibetan and every Indian.

Lord Buddha is the creator moron. If you had a true heart you would know, but since you have a filthy one without truth you remain ignorant.

With Lord Buddha in our mind we create this world.

RohanX wrote:

<quoted text>
FYI,...
Lord Buddha was from Mongolian Ancestry. He did not like the Aryan(Nazzi Mindset) Caste System and Superiority among Aryans and Indo-Aryans(Aryan+Dravidian mix) people against the Indigenous Dravidian people(Dark/native Skin).
BUT, after Lord Buddha's Demise, the same Indo-Aryans from Mongolian/Han Clan created the Religion Buddhism. Aryan/Indo-Aryan Buddhism has the same 'Nazzi' Mindset which encourages Caste System and have a hidden agenda to genocide the Indigenous people.
That Indo-Aryan/Aryan Agenda outcaste/d the Indigenous People as 'Low caste' and untouchables(just because they have dark skin and their women never slept with Aryans/Arabians/Chinese or even Russians from North(devas))
We call all the Buddhisms from all over the world except Tibet as Evils. Only Tibetian Buddhism is the best evil among those dirty evils.
So, let the Tibet Buddhism to survive.

Buddha was an Aryan, you monkey.

Buddha as Siddhatha was an Aryan. Buddha however has no birth, he is completely freed from ignorance.

RohanX wrote:

<quoted text>
FYI,...
Lord Buddha was from Mongolian Ancestry. He did not like the Aryan(Nazzi Mindset) Caste System and Superiority among Aryans and Indo-Aryans(Aryan+Dravidian mix) people against the Indigenous Dravidian people(Dark/native Skin).
BUT, after Lord Buddha's Demise, the same Indo-Aryans from Mongolian/Han Clan created the Religion Buddhism. Aryan/Indo-Aryan Buddhism has the same 'Nazzi' Mindset which encourages Caste System and have a hidden agenda to genocide the Indigenous people.
That Indo-Aryan/Aryan Agenda outcaste/d the Indigenous People as 'Low caste' and untouchables(just because they have dark skin and their women never slept with Aryans/Arabians/Chinese or even Russians from North(devas))
We call all the Buddhisms from all over the world except Tibet as Evils. Only Tibetian Buddhism is the best evil among those dirty evils.
So, let the Tibet Buddhism to survive.

everytime I ask these questions Tibetologist like you run away...

could you give us your views on Tibetans treatment (riots, killings etc) towards another minority Hui Muslims, in Tibet

and Dalai Lama own religious persecution of one of his own religious factions Dorje Shugden ...

or The Dalai Lama has admitted to the New York Times that he led an armed terrorist organization for a number of years until the mid 1970’s.

or

The Dalai Lama claims he is a holy man, but how did he get that title? He got it from the previous Dalai

Lama, a brutal slave owner, who corresponded with Adoph Hitler and praised Hitler. Hitler and the head of the Nazi

can you also talk about Tibetan slaves,and their life expectancy being 35 years

and the rape of 9 year old boys by monks

and why Tibetan monks are allowed to own property and drive around in a nice fancy car with Sharon Stone in it?

1 QUADRILLION BANK BETS wrote:

<quoted text>
everytime I ask these questions Tibetologist like you run away...
could you give us your views on Tibetans treatment (riots, killings etc) towards another minority Hui Muslims, in Tibet
and Dalai Lama own religious persecution of one of his own religious factions Dorje Shugden ...
or The Dalai Lama has admitted to the New York Times that he led an armed terrorist organization for a number of years until the mid 1970’s.
or
The Dalai Lama claims he is a holy man, but how did he get that title? He got it from the previous Dalai
Lama, a brutal slave owner, who corresponded with Adoph Hitler and praised Hitler. Hitler and the head of the Nazi
can you also talk about Tibetan slaves,and their life expectancy being 35 years
and the rape of 9 year old boys by monks
and why Tibetan monks are allowed to own property and drive around in a nice fancy car with Sharon Stone in it?

What are you? Male or Female or Gay
Do you have Full or 3 quarters ding dong?
Was Lord Buddha Aryan or Indian or Chinese?
Is Buddhism Evil or Good?

Answer these qustions with your mighty brain.

RohanX wrote:

<quoted text>
What are you? Male or Female or Gay
Do you have Full or 3 quarters ding dong?
Was Lord Buddha Aryan or Indian or Chinese?
Is Buddhism Evil or Good?
Answer these qustions with your mighty brain.

everytime I ask these questions Tibetologist like you run away...

could you give us your views on Tibetans treatment (riots, killings etc) towards another minority Hui Muslims, in Tibet

and Dalai Lama own religious persecution of one of his own religious factions Dorje Shugden ...

or The Dalai Lama has admitted to the New York Times that he led an armed terrorist organization for a number of years until the mid 1970’s.

or

The Dalai Lama claims he is a holy man, but how did he get that title? He got it from the previous Dalai

Lama, a brutal slave owner, who corresponded with Adoph Hitler and praised Hitler. Hitler and the head of the Nazi

can you also talk about Tibetan slaves,and their life expectancy being 35 years

and the rape of 9 year old tibetan boys by monks

and why Tibetan monks are allowed to own property and drive around in a nice fancy car with Sharon Stone in it?

are they allowed too look at her pee pee?

RohanX wrote:

<quoted text>
What are you? Male or Female or Gay
Do you have Full or 3 quarters ding dong?
Was Lord Buddha Aryan or Indian or Chinese?
Is Buddhism Evil or Good?
Answer these qustions with your mighty brain.

No answers for a monkey-- no insults to monkeys intended.
Buddhism is purity of knowledge. Therefore it is good.
Buddha was neither Chinese, Indian, or Tibetan.
Buddha was purity personified, like a beautiful lotus -- full of knowledge of all things but untouched by it.

Religions have had a close relationship not only with violence but with economic exploitation. Indeed, it is often the economic exploitation that necessitates the violence. Such was the case with the Tibetan theocracy. Until 1959, when the Dalai Lama last presided over Tibet, most of the arable land was still organized into manorial estates worked by serfs. These estates were owned by two social groups: the rich secular landlords and the rich theocratic lamas. Even a writer sympathetic to the old order allows that “a great deal of real estate belonged to the monasteries, and most of them amassed great riches.” Much of the wealth was accumulated “through active participation in trade, commerce, and money lending.” 10

Drepung monastery was one of the biggest landowners in the world, with its 185 manors, 25,000 serfs, 300 great pastures, and 16,000 herdsmen. The wealth of the monasteries rested in the hands of small numbers of high-ranking lamas. Most ordinary monks lived modestly and had no direct access to great wealth. The Dalai Lama himself “lived richly in the 1000-room, 14-story Potala Palace.” 11

Secular leaders also did well. A notable example was the commander-in-chief of the Tibetan army, a member of the Dalai Lama’s lay Cabinet, who owned 4,000 square kilometers of land and 3,500 serfs. 12 Old Tibet has been misrepresented by some Western admirers as “a nation that required no police force because its people voluntarily observed the laws of karma.” 13 In fact. it had a professional army, albeit a small one, that served mainly as a gendarmerie for the landlords to keep order, protect their property, and hunt down runaway serfs.

Young Tibetan boys were regularly taken from their peasant families and brought into the monasteries to be trained as monks. Once there, they were bonded for life. Tashì-Tsering, a monk, reports that it was common for peasant children to be sexually mistreated in the monasteries. He himself was a victim of repeated rape, beginning at age nine. The monastic estates also conscripted children for lifelong servitude as domestics, dance performers, and soldiers.

In old Tibet there were small numbers of farmers who subsisted as a kind of free peasantry, and perhaps an additional 10,000 people who composed the “middle-class” families of merchants, shopkeepers, and small traders. Thousands of others were beggars. There also were slaves, usually domestic servants, who owned nothing. Their offspring were born into slavery. 15 The majority of the rural population were serfs. Treated little better than slaves, the serfs went without schooling or medical care, They were under a lifetime bond to work the lord's land--or the monastery’s land--without pay, to repair the lord's houses, transport his crops, and collect his firewood. They were also expected to provide carrying animals and transportation on demand.16 Their masters told them what crops to grow and what animals to raise. They could not get married without the consent of their lord or lama. And they might easily be separated from their families should their owners lease them out to work in a distant location. 17

http://www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html

Hello wrote:

<quoted text>
No answers for a monkey-- no insults to monkeys intended.
Buddhism is purity of knowledge. Therefore it is good.
Buddha was neither Chinese, Indian, or Tibetan.
Buddha was purity personified, like a beautiful lotus -- full of knowledge of all things but untouched by it.

I am not against Lord Buddha or Lord Jesus or Prophet Mohammad or Bhagawan Krishna or any Good People come to give us Knowledge.

I am fully against all the Evil Religions which kill the Indigenous people on the frustration of unable to convert.

I am against China to use Shree Lankan Buddhist Genocidal Agenda to destroy and genocide Tibetian Buddhism and Tibetians accordingly.

Hello wrote:

<quoted text>
No answers for a monkey-- no insults to monkeys intended.
Buddhism is purity of knowledge. Therefore it is good.
Buddha was neither Chinese, Indian, or Tibetan.
Buddha was purity personified, like a beautiful lotus -- full of knowledge of all things but untouched by it.

you are wrong,
buddha was indian,
and hello,what do you think,was buddha reincarnation of god?

duDE xXx wrote:

<quoted text>
you are wrong,
buddha was indian,
and hello,what do you think,was buddha reincarnation of god?

Are you sure that thing is 'God'; that could be 'Ghost' as well.

That is why lots of people say just 'G'.