Is the U.S. Ready for a Mormon President?

Judged:

1

eyeful wrote:

<quoted text>
USELESS TROLL.

Judged:

1

eyeful wrote:

<quoted text>
SPAM MASTER.

Judged:

1

1

1

seedtick wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course I can. But, when Barack Husssein Obama finds enough fault with the rest of us to "fundamentally change" our nation and lambasts the "evil rich" in our country I figure he needs to be reminded of his and his wife's excesses...along with those who make excuses for him and Michelle. It is no more OK for them to flash their wealth than it is for anyone else to do so.

Osirica wrote:

Nope.
Blue light is scattered more frequently by the fact that that wavelength of particles is more likely to hit the molecules than the other wavelengths.
That's like saying "How do you get to a destination"
and you answer "by driving"
Nope.
<quoted text>

Judged:

2

2

1

seedtick wrote:

<quoted text>
Look, when people like the dipshit I was responding to get nasty with me they can expect to get the same in return. Are you saying he can spew his crap without being called out? What does that make you?

Judged:

1

Osirica wrote:

There is no legal or social crime by her buying those shoes.
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

Osirica wrote:

There is no such thing as reverse discrimination. There is just discrimination. IT's not an on off switch based on which race it is.
Discrimination against black people is still rampant. And any kind of discrimination is wrong. But the scale of it against blacks and latinos, based on subjective stereotyping is outrageous.
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

Osirica wrote:

shinning
[shin] &#8194; Origin
shin
1 &#8194; &#8194;[shin] Show IPA noun, verb, shinned, shin·ning.
noun
1.
the front part of the leg from the knee to the ankle.
2.
the lower part of the foreleg in cattle.
3.
the shinbone or tibia, especially its sharp edge or front portion.
4.
Chiefly British . a cut of beef similar to the U.S. shank, usually cut into small pieces for stewing.
verb (used with object), verb (used without object)
5.
to climb by holding fast with the hands or arms and legs and drawing oneself up.
So I just shake my head when I read your silly post below
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
U-u-u-m-m-m....
Nice mud you have there, boy.

Judged:

1

Osirica wrote:

Yea,
we all do.
You care to dispute that?
<quoted text>

eyeful wrote:

<quoted text>
EMPTY SUIT.

Osirica wrote:

And you continue to behave then like a naive fool.
If it talks like a duck...
________ <-- insert dull witted sarcastic reply here please.
<quoted text>

Osirica wrote:

My goodness, it is definitely the people that make Lapeer suck.
Obama has not engaged in nearly the level of corruption that Bush did with Halliburton and the Bin Laden oil family. Starting Iraq based on lies and failing to protect us by sleeping when 911 happened.
You're a douchebag 100 for not seeing that obvious fact.
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

eyeful wrote:

<quoted text>
SHUT IN.

Judged:

2

1

1

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
Reverse Discrimination exists. Period. Your denial and your opinion are perversions of reality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_discrimi...

Judged:

2

1

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text>Did you lambast Bush for his $1000 suits and the First lady for her $2500 de la Renta suits?
I am not saying they shouldn't be called on excess. I'm saying that the calls should be put out to all of those who are running this country or running for office.

McCain was talking about the evil rich when he was running and is married to an heiress who spends money as if it were water. Did anyone make comments about that? Why is it okay for them to do this and not Obama? If you're going to lambaste one, lambaste all.

Judged:

1

shinningmoron wrote:

<quoted text>
A single neuron is difficult to locate much less hit with a scalpel.

Judged:

1

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text> Did you lambast Bush for his $1000 suits and the First lady for her $2500 de la Renta suits?
I am not saying they shouldn't be called on excess. I'm saying that the calls should be put out to all of those who are running this country or running for office.
McCain was talking about the evil rich when he was running and is married to an heiress who spends money as if it were water. Did anyone make comments about that? Why is it okay for them to do this and not Obama? If you're going to lambaste one, lambaste all.

eyeful wrote:

<quoted text>
USED DEPENDS.

Judged:

1

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text> The first sentence in this article makes this statement...
Reverse discrimination is a controversial term referring to discrimination against members of a dominant or majority group, including the city or state, or in favor of members of a minority or historically disadvantaged group.
' a controversial term'.
So the term exists, it's just not widely accepted.