Should same-sex marriage become legal?

Judged:

1

1

1

Hootus wrote:

<quoted text>
"decent" you dumbsh!t. It was an autocorrect.

Kom2 wrote:

<quoted text>
My friend, where did you hear this?

Judged:

1

1

1

Kom2 wrote:

<quoted text>
My friend, Saul was not homosexual, where did you hear this?

dances with weebles wrote:

the closest english translation of the latin volgate, however, was done by john wycliffe... are you up for it?

dances with weebles wrote:

(it gives most people a screaming headache)

Judged:

1

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>

PS: Would you mind telling me how do you know about Wycliffe?

Kom2 wrote:

<quoted text>
My friend, where did you hear this?

Judged:

1

1

1

NoQ wrote:

You fking HOMOSexuals are pathetic, nasty A$$ freaks of nature.

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
Gary, As usual, you gave it away like a virgin on prom night
That "cougar" crap was a bit sketchy, but that's what happens when you don't stick to what you know. And you CLEARLY don't know much about women!
I did like the whole 23 years as an airline stewardess thing, was it inspired by some 1960's porn?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Stewardesses

WasteWater wrote:

Chump, you couldn't help yourself out of a paper bag!
TYPICAL KEN AD HOMINEM POSTS
More nasty words from the 54yr old trannie.
Believe me, certainly don't need or want anything from you. Not enough disinfectant on Earth!
You dumb libs are just full of hate.....
54 ty old tired rump doing an upskirt ... what a slut! My guess, trannie... with padding no less!
and PS....go f##k yourselves!
YOU PROUD KEN?

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
WOW! what a great life you have...The Marina? I am so impressed!
Yes, we are truly blessed that you're posting every fascinating detail here because there is no one in your off line life who gives a crap.

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
Apparently you can't accept new information that challenges your beliefs either. No matter how ignorant and unfounded those beliefs are.
Being simple minded must make life pretty simple,

dances with weebles wrote:

<quoted text>
from over 30 years of study both in and out of seminary and theology school.

Judged:

1

1

1

NoQ wrote:

<quoted text>
Everyone has a choice just like when you were abused as a child, you liked it and made a choice to be a Queer. Facts don't lie. LMFAO

Robsan5 wrote:

<quoted text>
Ken, here's what the SCOTUS said about marriage in it's Loving vs. Virginia decision:
"The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the convictions in a unanimous decision (dated June 12, 1967), dismissing the Commonwealth of Virginia's argument that a law forbidding both white and black persons from marrying persons of another race, and providing identical penalties to white and black violators, could not be construed as racially discriminatory. The court ruled that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute violated both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its decision, the court wrote:
“ Marriage is one of the "BASIC CIVIL RIGHTS (my caps) of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival.... To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discrimination. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State."
ROBERT

Judged:

1

1

1

Ken wrote:

<quoted text>
Next you two anti-Catholics will restart the Lollards. The wolves are finding their way back to England. Perhaps you two could re-enact the burnin of Cranmer at the stake afer he recanted his recanting.
Anti-Catholic bigots.
What seminary? Taught you plenty of hate didn't it? Some reverend!

Robsan5 wrote:

<quoted text>
Ken, you're getting a little off track here...
Robert

Robsan5 wrote:

<quoted text>
Kom, yet again you fail to give any quote from the bible that prohibits same-sex marriage.
Why are you against it?
Do not add to the bible; it is a sin.
Proverb 30:6.
Robert

Judged:

1

1

1

No Surprise wrote:

<quoted text>
Sometimes the absence of a statement means that.
If your mom told you as you grew from a child to a teen, that your purpose in life was to find someone of the same sex, marry them and live long and happily, where in that statement would you assume your mom was also saying that it was okay to find someone of the opposite sex, hopefully have children and live long and happily?
Well that is what pro-same sex marriage people are assuming of what God didn't say as what he was also saying. Follow the logic?
God told his first son and daughter that their purpose was to become one in a relationship and (hopefully) have children. That message was passed down from them to their children and their children etc. It was such an important command that it was one of the first commands given to the children of God.
So (as not the first time it has been done I am sure) we have recent generations that want to "assume" that since God didn't out right exclude same sex marriage, it must be okay.

Judged:

1

1

1

Ken wrote:

<quoted text>
Robert,
Not really...unfortunately one does have to get down into the gutter sometimes.
Ken

Judged:

1

1

1

Ken wrote:

<quoted text>
Robert,
1967 is quite a bit before the gay movement....hardly think the justices were thinking of that.
Marriage is not called a civil right in the Constitution, and no judge, not even 9 judges decide how I will believe. I will obey the law, but I have every right to try to overturn it. Roe v. Wade has lost considerable support since it became law.
Remember the Dred Scott decision? Shows the Supreme Court CAN be wrong.
Race and sexual orientation are not the same issue.
Ken