Baldwin Park business owner fuming after Azusa mandates business license for deliveries

Small Business Owner wrote:

<quoted text>
Take a read of Brabant v. City of South Gate http://law.justia.com/cases/california/calapp... .
or CITY OF SAN JOSE v. RUTHROFF & ENGLEKIRK ETC. http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx...
Just because they demand it doesn't make it right.

I never said it was right or wrong.

There are many taxes that may seem wrong to you, but others might find them right. As an example, there are many parents who send their kids to private school, who might disagree with a portion of their tax proceeds going towards the funding of public education. Now if they stop paying a portion of the taxes. Let's Try it, and you will find

...you will find IRS knocking on your door!

AZUSA Sucks, period. I have a license to manage property but still must get a separate license for each property which requires an interior inspection. The inspectors always find something chicken chit to whine about. AZUSA has beewn corrupt for many, many years.

Mad Guy wrote:

AZUSA Sucks, period. I have a license to manage property but still must get a separate license for each property which requires an interior inspection. The inspectors always find something chicken chit to whine about. AZUSA has beewn corrupt for many, many years.

Just because the inspector is finding things that are not to code does not mean the city is corrupt. Quit your whining!

Mad Guy wrote:

AZUSA Sucks, period. I have a license to manage property but still must get a separate license for each property which requires an interior inspection. The inspectors always find something chicken chit to whine about. AZUSA has beewn corrupt for many, many years.

Gee. that must make it difficult to manage a slum! If you don't like it, sell your property and get the hell out of Azusa!