|
climie fisher
Washington, DC
|
HMMM wrote: <quoted text> The park IS safe - obviously, it is the mother who is not looking after her child that is NOT safe! How do you know?
|
|
Since: Jul 07
Aurora, CO
|
Please wait...
Disgusted by comments wrote: I can't believe most of the comments that I'm reading. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. Instead of showing some empathy there is just blame, blame, blame. You blame the mother, the town, etc. A child got hurt!!!!!! Let's feel something!!! It's called using your brain, and using intelligence over emotion. your response is total emotion. ANd you claim "blame blame blame". All I see is the mother placing blame on an accident to others. THe kid fell, plain and simple, it happens. Sometimes kids get hurt, sometimes they don't.
|
|
Since: Jul 07
Aurora, CO
|
Please wait...
Former Pequan wrote: Oh come on, if it were your kid, you'd sue too. I would sue for enough to pay for his college education and then some. Good luck to that family. I hope the lawsuit closes the place down. Don't assume everybody is a hypocrite like you may or may not be
|
|
CHOP
Riverhead, NY
|
Levittowner wrote: Hey DDDDDDD I do have kids and I would not have let them walk through any ride or whatever it was alone. Hand would have been held. Especially being 6 years old. Just like the hands are held getting on and off the LIRR. People sue, insurance rates go up, parks fees go up to cover the cost. Sue for the medical bills because if I was on the jury thats all you would get unless you prove that the park knew it was unsafe and let people on the ride. Thats the only time I see them at fault. And in these days, even a park worker taking action such as cleaning the injury or trying to stop the bleeding they would sue those people too because they would claim they did more damage. It's a sad world we live in. Money makes the world go round. Hey Levittowner! Yeah, you talk like that because it was NOT your own child. Why are you so worried about rates going up? When rates go up you are not the only one paying for them, so relax your hormones. Remember, there is GAPS on the ride, in which they SHOULD be fixed...
|
|
Duh lalalulu
Mine Hill, NJ
|
lalalulu wrote: <quoted text> People can get hurt anywhere, anytime, particularly at a place crowded with unsupervised kids running around. I hope you enjoy paying for this frivolous lawsuit, because that's what will happen when the business passes on the cost of increased insurance rates - DUH! I wouldn't be caught dead at a lowbrow place like Adventureland.
|
|
CHOP
Riverhead, NY
|
Stephanie wrote: MY KIDS WILL NEVER GO TO ADVENTURELAND, SINCE THOSE TWO PEOPLE DIES IN 05 I HAVE NEVER BROUGHT THEM THERE SINCE. IT IS NOT INSPECTED BY THE STATE LIKE BIGGER AMUSEMENT PARKS! EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
tigerlili
New York, NY
|
bond007 wrote: <quoted text> The child fell and lost his balance. That is not a lawsuit. A tragic accident but not a lawsuit. I hope the judge makes the parents pay the defendants' legal fees as an example not to waste tax payer money. That's where you are wrong. It's referred to as inherent risk. If a ride is considered to be inherently risky, then a case can be made that the owners/operators knew or should have known that there was the potential for this type of accident. That being said, and I'm not taking anyone's side in this, I have an 8 year old who has gone on very similar walk through rides at carnivals and has been hurt (not badly thank goodness) on those very same revolving plates. I have seen other children fall on them. I have been on them and lost my balance, and I'm an adult. They are pretty dangerous for little kids.
|
|
tigerlili
New York, NY
|
Jen wrote: <quoted text> The kid didn't fall and get hurt. The stupid ride had flaws and the kid's hand got mangled! I agree and posted something to that effect a few minutes ago. It's referred to as inherent risk. If a ride is considered to be inherently risky, then a case can be made that the owners/operators knew or should have known that there was the potential for this type of accident. I have an 8 year old who has gone on very similar walk through rides at carnivals and has been hurt (not badly thank goodness) on those very same revolving plates. I have seen other children fall on them. I have been on them and lost my balance, and I'm an adult. They are pretty dangerous for little kids.
|
|
|
Manhattan
New York, NY
|
Your Kidding wrote: Lost of mobility, Hey Moron!, it's an open wound. Of course here will be loss of mobility. Lets wait until it heals before making that assinine remark. Better yet,I love this one. Te ride was not supervised, NEITHER WAS YOUR KID!, are you kidding me. How far away were you that you needed to rush over to his aid. Now I'm laughing on this remark. They wanted to shut the ride down for a few days to see the cause of the problem. I can conclude that from here. LAck of supervision from the PARENT, YOU ARE THE CAUSE OF THE INJURY, NOT THE AMUSEMENT PARK. And people wonder why prices are so high. It's because people like this who have children who have no idea how to raise them and hope someone else will pay for them. One can only hope you were neutered years ago and thus have absolutely no chance to reproduce. If someone gave you money, do you think you could buy a clue?
|
|
Hand Burgers
Hauppauge, NY
|
If it were my kid, I'd be at the lawyer's office too. And so would 99.9% of the other posters here, who is kidding who.
The kid might have legitimate permanent damage to that hand after it heals, if they were to go back to the park in a month instead of NOW, the park would tell them to take a hike.
They did the right thing reporting it, getting medical help and an attorney. With all the co-payments for specialists (at $30 and up per visit) and possibly surgery who know how much they would have to lay out.
|
|
observer
Garden City, NY
|
mommy of 1 wrote: Let me explain something to everybody, people who get injured sue rightfully so. This child went to the park for a day of fun. He got his hand mangeled!!! Im sure you would not be happy if that was your son. He will be traumatized for life, not to mention the pain this child had to go through. People sue to get surgeries and medical expenses and bills that have accumilated while being injured and out of work reimbursed. Most often things dont happen at places like this, who are well insured,for events of this nature. Most people in personal injury lawsuits end up going bankrupt before they ever see any money, they cant make their bills because they are out of work, and social security-disability pays the same to everyone, regardless of their job standings. I think its $157 dollars a week. Who can live off that, while out of work. Plus they have surgeries and medical expenses. If the people "in the wrong" do not have good insurance coverage, the injured go bankrupt, until their settlements. Granted this child does not work, but the parents will have to be home with him, losing income. There should not be rides at amusement parks that could injure children and kill people like adventureland. They should use some of the huge money they profit everyday and make the park safe. Might as well give our kids knives to play with. Oh please, get off your soapbox. It was an accident. The kid is going to be "traumatized for life?" What's your real name anyway, SUE?!
|
|
Pete
Brooklyn, NY
|
Gregg in Denver wrote: <quoted text> He fell!! Causing his own injuries. Jsut like if the kid fell at a mall and his hands got caught in the escalator, are people going to demand they shut down escalators because of a kid falling? The solution to this point is obvious and that's not to allow children anyplace where there is dangerous equipment, including AMUSEMENT PARKS.
|
|
HMMM
Garfield, NJ
|
climie fisher wrote: <quoted text> How do you know? She let go of the child's hand, did she not? Why was she not on the ride with the child supervising him? In matters such as this (she took the child to the park and allowed him to go on a ride without her in attendance), it is easier for parents to blame someone else for their own blunders -it is a form of absolution and reassurance to themselves that the blunder was not a result of their own poor judgment or lack of parenting skills.
|
|
Pete
Brooklyn, NY
|
HMMM wrote: <quoted text> The park IS safe - obviously, it is the mother who is not looking after her child that is NOT safe! You sound like a cheerleader for the Park owners. People like you always vote against your best interests and opinionate against your best interests. You have to be a total loser.
|
|
Absinger
Brooklyn, NY
|
Manhattan wrote: <quoted text> One can only hope you were neutered years ago and thus have absolutely no chance to reproduce. If someone gave you money, do you think you could buy a clue? Your comment makes no sence, and neither do you. Guess it is true. All the money in the world cannot buy common sence. But, if you give me an address to send some, it will be a good start for you.
|
|
HAS SUED BEFORE
New York, NY
|
Sick of this Shit wrote: Okay people, enough. The kid caught his hand and got hurt. Now you want to sue Adventureland? Get over it, you're just looking for some fast cash. Years ago kids fell and got hurt and nothing happened. The world has gone "sue" happy and they think Adventureland will pay up. I hope they go all the way to trial and give this greedy family not a nickel. I know the Adventureland family personally and they are caring and would never let someone injured not be tended to. Get over yourself and go to work for your money! (CAPS INTENTIONAL) MOM HAS A HISTORY OF TAKING LEGAL ACTION LIKE THIS BEFORE.(DIFFERENT CHILD/FATHER)
|
|
formerlysingle mom
Centerport, NY
|
DDDDDDDDD wrote: <quoted text> I know accidents happen but this was an accident that could have been avoided.. It could and will happen to other children if they dont do something to fix the gaps in the wall. The gaps are what make the floor shake and that is why a paerent should be holding a 6 year ols hand. I have a six year old and I would be holding his hand.Sure the park should pay the medical bills thats what they have insurance for BUT parents need to be more resposible for their children
|
|
Hmmm
Temple Hills, MD
|
dog owner wrote: O.K the parks manager should be fired and properly trained employees should be hired. How can he say he is just a child that got hurt. That is someones son, and he got more than just hurt, his hand is completely destroyed, and skin graphs an reconstructive surgery are extremely painful for adults, imagine a child having to go through that repeatedly. I will never bring any of my children to such an irresponsible establishment. Isn't there something the town can do to force the park to have safer rides and qualified employees working there. Al I see is young teenagers working there, and I know it's cheap labor, but it is at the expense of our childrens safety. "His hand is completely destroyed"??? I didn't see this in the article. Are you in possession of information not available to the rest of us who are reading this?
|
|
never ends
Orlando, FL
|
painNsuffering wrote: I'm sorry folks, but haven't you ever heard of pain and suffering? I myself am a saxophone player, and if i went to an amusment park to have a good time, and all of a sudden i trip and mangle my hand (which is this case, i don't know if you read the article or not, the kid is Missing Skin from his hand, and bone is showing) Saxophone would be gone for me. Sure it will heal, no doubt, but the gigs that I would have for the time i mangled my hand, would be gone, and thats money lost for me. What do you think about that? think you need to be more careful and watch where your going...
|
|
HMMM
Garfield, NJ
|
Pete wrote: <quoted text> You sound like a cheerleader for the Park owners. People like you always vote against your best interests and opinionate against your best interests. You have to be a total loser. Don't miss the point...the parent is the one ultimately responsible for the child. I can only hope I am polled for the jury on this one.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|