The Michael Vick Argument

Vinny wrote:

You are right. The dates have changed but the argument is still the same.

Gino wrote:

<quoted text>ban Vick from the NFL
http://www.thepetitionsite.om/2/keep=michael-...

Judged:

1

1

1

USA ROCKS wrote:

<quoted text>
DOWHATUDO2YOURSELF,
Have your arguments in support of the dogkiller become so empty and baseless that all you have left to resort to is a pathetic attempt at becoming the Sherlock Holmes of the mv forum?
Your little detective game is really becoming tiresome, senseless, and boring.
I guess when all you have to offer in support of one of the most vile, cruel, and insidious degenerates to ever make the news is, "We all deserve a second chance", you know that wears off quite quickly and soon has very little meaning.
You know there is no good reason why a young, wealthy, successful NFL QB should have to, or more appropriately in this case, want to, engage in a multi state dogfighting operation so the only thing you have left is the pitiful "second chance" proverbial chant. And that runs dry very quickly doesn't it? The reason he did it is because he is a thug. He is void of normal compassion for a living sentient being and insensitive to some of the most cruel savagery ever inflicted upon innocent dogs.
I'm pretty sure I know the reason why you and most others defend and support vick and second chances have nothing to do with it.
You know it too but admitting it would only make you out to be even more pathetic than you already are.

USA ROCKS wrote:

<quoted text>
DOWHATUDO2YOURSELF,
Have your arguments in support of the dogkiller become so empty and baseless that all you have left to resort to is a pathetic attempt at becoming the Sherlock Holmes of the mv forum?
Your little detective game is really becoming tiresome, senseless, and boring.
I guess when all you have to offer in support of one of the most vile, cruel, and insidious degenerates to ever make the news is, "We all deserve a second chance", you know that wears off quite quickly and soon has very little meaning.
You know there is no good reason why a young, wealthy, successful NFL QB should have to, or more appropriately in this case, want to, engage in a multi state dogfighting operation so the only thing you have left is the pitiful "second chance" proverbial chant. And that runs dry very quickly doesn't it? The reason he did it is because he is a thug. He is void of normal compassion for a living sentient being and insensitive to some of the most cruel savagery ever inflicted upon innocent dogs.
I'm pretty sure I know the reason why you and most others defend and support vick and second chances have nothing to do with it.
You know it too but admitting it would only make you out to be even more pathetic than you already are.

Judged:

1

Dreamland wrote:

No team is going to think Vick can just step in a be a starter and 30 year old backup Quarterbacks who are hated by a sizeable portion of society do not make millions of dollars. Perhaps Vick's best bet is the new pro football league that is supposed to open this fall. They'll need all the attention they can get and Vick may not be able to play anymore but there will still be some interest in seeing him play.

USA ROCKS wrote:

Overall a good article, except for her erroneous statement that the dogkiller "agreed" to pay for the long term care and rehabilitation of the dogs that escaped his dogfighting hellhole.
He didn't agree to pay for anything relative to the care of those dogs, it was forced upon him and part of his sentencing judegment.
RESTITUTION JUDGMENT:
1.Pursuant to the agreement contained in paragraph 8 of the defendant's Plea Agreement,
MICHAEL VICK is sentenced to pay $928,073.04 as restitution for the past, present, and
long term care of all dogs which were previously the subject of the civil action known as
United States v. Approximately 53 Pit Bull Does. Case No. 3:07CV397.

Dreamland wrote:

No team is going to think Vick can just step in a be a starter and 30 year old backup Quarterbacks who are hated by a sizeable portion of society do not make millions of dollars. Perhaps Vick's best bet is the new pro football league that is supposed to open this fall. They'll need all the attention they can get and Vick may not be able to play anymore but there will still be some interest in seeing him play.

Raven wrote:

<quoted text>Looks like it!
http://www.petitiononline.com/ridofvic/petiti...

Dreamland wrote:

No team is going to think Vick can just step in a be a starter and 30 year old backup Quarterbacks who are hated by a sizeable portion of society do not make millions of dollars. Perhaps Vick's best bet is the new pro football league that is supposed to open this fall. They'll need all the attention they can get and Vick may not be able to play anymore but there will still be some interest in seeing him play.

Doglover wrote:

And they will be sorry

Doglover wrote:

And they will be sorry

Beverly wrote:

Just in case someone from the NFL thinks that Michal Vick is worth the loss that the NFT will incurr if they sign a contract with Michal Vick - let me assure them that even the 'die-hard' NFL customers and fans will spit on the box office vs. buy tickets to the games.

Beverly wrote:

Just in case someone from the NFL thinks that Michal Vick is worth the loss that the NFT will incurr if they sign a contract with Michal Vick - let me assure them that even the 'die-hard' NFL customers and fans will spit on the box office vs. buy tickets to the games.

Beverly wrote:

Just in case someone from the NFL thinks that Michal Vick is worth the loss that the NFT will incurr if they sign a contract with Michal Vick - let me assure them that even the 'die-hard' NFL customers and fans will spit on the box office vs. buy tickets to the games.

Fl Dog-lover wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.sackvick.net/2009/08/02/only-6-nfl...
Dog lovers check it out