Brady, Pats unstoppable

Bewitched wrote:

Yep, those Saints scare me. Not so sure that they've had the toughest schedule though, but Pats get to host them Nov 30 ESPN 7:30.

Bewitched wrote:

Don't go singing 'Another One Bites the Dust' yet. lol Big one coming up AT Colts next. I've been waiting for this one since the schedule came out.

Judged:

4

3

3

Spy Cameras wrote:

Pats hit that hard.

Judged:

3

3

2

skidrow wilson wrote:

<quoted text>
I wear little lady undies...

Judged:

3

3

2

odin indiana wrote:

<quoted text>
"we're not so smart"

Judged:

4

4

4

skidrow wilson wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm on medical marijuana...lol

Judged:

3

3

2

odon Indeeee wrote:

<quoted text>
we have an inferiority complex...

Judged:

2

2

2

bigblow wilson wrote:

<quoted text>
i love my little lady big butt undies...

Judged:

1

1

1

Spy Cameras wrote:

Pats need to hit that spy film extra hard now.

Judged:

1

1

1

skidrow wilson wrote:

<quoted text>
Pats had the lead and choked. Defense sucks and coaching calls suck

Bewitched wrote:

Manning and Brady both have 16 TDs and 5 inter, and they are both in their last year of their contracts. I smell money.
Pats have Green, Tate and Taylor out, with Light doubtful.
Colts have Gonzo, Hayden and Vinatieri out.
Anybody think Pats are going to give Maroney the ball some tonight? He's gotten a TD in each of the last 3 games.
Moss is playing and I can't wait for that show.
And what would we do without Welker?

TMD wrote:

<quoted text>
Colts were missing a lot more than just the two you mentioned:
Hayden - CB
Jackson - CB/S
Sanders - S
Hagler - LB
Gonzalez - WR
Hart - RB
Vinatieri - K
That's 4 defensive starters, and the #2 wide receiver. They were ALL replaced with rookies, except for Vinatieri.
Good game, bad coaching call at the end.
It was a bad weekend, all around, for any Boston team playing in Indy. Celtics lost 113-102 to the Pacers, who have now won 4 straight. Patriots lost 35-34 to the Colts, who have now won 9 straight.
Don't know what happened to Boston College, but it's a good thing they weren't playing in Indy...

TMD wrote:

<quoted text>
Colts were missing a lot more than just the two you mentioned:
Hayden - CB
Jackson - CB/S
Sanders - S
Hagler - LB
Gonzalez - WR
Hart - RB
Vinatieri - K
That's 4 defensive starters, and the #2 wide receiver. They were ALL replaced with rookies, except for Vinatieri.
Good game, bad coaching call at the end.
It was a bad weekend, all around, for any Boston team playing in Indy. Celtics lost 113-102 to the Pacers, who have now won 4 straight. Patriots lost 35-34 to the Colts, who have now won 9 straight.
Don't know what happened to Boston College, but it's a good thing they weren't playing in Indy...

Bewitched wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, I know there were more, I just grabbed the MAJOR ones. Pats had some 'probables', but there again I just grabbed their MAJOR ones. Only matters is who DID play.
In hindsight, it was a bad call. If it worked, it would have been genius. I think at that point, the way the Colts were putting up points, Bill didn't trust his defense as much as he trusted his offense. IMO Would have been 70 yds for the Colts drive vs the 30 yds it became.
I think Pats (Maroney) turning the ball over in the end zone, giving the Colts the touchback instead of giving the Pats 6 points was the beginning of the end. JMO
But using up their time outs way too early like the Pats did, THAT was their bad call.
Tough come from behind loss for the Pats, but wasn't it a great battle?

Judged:

1

Glasnos wrote:

<quoted text>
Patton already had two long drives for scores in two minutes or less. I think Bill showed a lot of respect for Patton. I can understand it.