NFL Releases Statement Supporting Touchdown Decision

Sep 25, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: WBAY-TV Green Bay

The statement was posted on NFL.com and details the league's support of the decision not to overturn the Seahawk's touchdown.

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 15 of15
Tom in Seattle

College Station, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Sep 25, 2012
 
Blah, blah, blah, stop cryin in your cheese. That game on Monday night was full of bad officiating from the get go. The packers touchdown drive was" bad call" aided on a call just as bad as the PI call against the Packers toward the end of the game. Every series was an officiating adventure and we all knew it, exept maybe the cheeseheads of the world. If Aaron Rogers led the pack to over 12 point you would have had nothing to worry about. The Packers offense was very pedestrian last night. Finally, when you lose a Superbowl on bad calls then we can both be in the bad call club. Until then, simmer down.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Sep 26, 2012
 
Tom in Seattle wrote:
That game on Monday night was full of bad officiating from the get go.
THAT is the point. In fact, any true NFL fan has noticed that it certainly hasn't been confined to the Seattle/Green Bay game. Poor officiating is affecting much too many games and we're only 3 weeks into the season. It's been a fairly minor problem so far because we're only in week 3. It won't be a minor problem by the time we get to the final month of the season or in the playoffs.
winchester89

Charlotte, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Sep 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

yeah i know imagine if the replacement refs officate the playoffs or the superbowl then it would be an issue for players, but these replacement refs suck at doing there jobs and the coaches and players are trying to control theri emotions during each game but its reaching a boiling point very soon.
Rulz Books

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Sep 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3 of the NFL Rule Book defines a catch: It doesnt matter with these refs...
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Sep 26, 2012
 
Rulz Books wrote:
Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3 of the NFL Rule Book defines a catch: It doesnt matter with these refs...
Are you referring to that one rule or the entire rule book? Have they even seen the rule book?
Blind Refs

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Sep 26, 2012
 
Referring to these refs not knowing the rules period....
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Sep 26, 2012
 
Blind Refs wrote:
Referring to these refs not knowing the rules period....
These guys have been working for months now. They frequently don't know the rules or even where to spot the ball. It's ridiculous. If they can't understand the rules by now, what makes anybody think that reading the rule book the 759th time will make it sink in?
Just Wing It

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Sep 26, 2012
 
They probably were never informed of a rule book exsisting....
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Sep 26, 2012
 
Just Wing It wrote:
They probably were never informed of a rule book exsisting....
That would be consistent with the 90 year history of the NFL opposing training for the referees. The NFL never wanted the regular refs to get adequate training. It wouldn't make sense if the NFL wanted it for the temps.
Readin Is Fun

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Sep 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

They probably had an initial replacement meeting....explained to these clowns what a football was, then told them to make sure they grabbed one of the NFL rule books as they departed....which none of them did...

Since: Dec 11

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Sep 26, 2012
 
Jennings caught the ball, pulled it into his chest and planted his feet. In what alternate universe is that NOT an interception? I hope tha Pack DOES decide to take a knee on every play. I think that might light a fire under someone's butt! These refs seem to be fans. You might as well put ME out there officiating a Packers game! Please believe me when I say that I would NOT be impartial!
Roger Nogoodell

Miami, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Sep 26, 2012
 
Taking a knee on every play would improve Tannehill's QB rating.
Replacement Beans

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Sep 26, 2012
 
Things NOT to perform while eating at Chalupas Tacos...

1. light a fire under someone's butt
Tony Sparanofarts

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Sep 26, 2012
 
Roger Nogoodell wrote:
Taking a knee on every play would improve Tannehill's QB rating.
Ah, There is hope for Sanchez...
reggie1-2

Garden City, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Sep 26, 2012
 
Of course the nfl would stick by the decision- there just covering there butts.
They know that they messed up but will not publicly say so.
A radio sports guy said something very interesting the other day about the call- he said- he thinks that the refs were scared to death that if they reviewed the call and changed it to a interception, the seattle fans in the stadium would have rioted.
He felt the crowd being as loud and hyped up as they were- intimidated the refs decision.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 15 of15
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••
•••
•••