Hargrove penalty: NFL now discredits video

Jul 7, 2012 Full story: ESPN 2,178

Green Bay Packers defensive end Anthony Hargrove has insisted on multiple occasion s that a key piece of evidence against him in the New Orleans Saints bounty issue is a case of mistaken identity.

Full Story

“DA BEARS FAN!”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#1347 Aug 4, 2012
eric wrote:
<quoted text>You mean as fake as their SB ring they won? The fact your qb pulled himself out of an NFC title game and got out played by a 3rd stringer.You have given us the Bears will be great speech and win the division speech and what? YOu choked TWICE To your rival in 4 weeks with the playoffs on the line and the following year, you lose an average qb at best and choke out the last few games and out of the playoffs.You had homefield advantage and lost to the Packers with the SB on the line and thats MUCH worse then anything GB did last year,We lost to the hottest team in the league and eventual Champs ( like you did) BUT,you lost to your main Rival TWICE in 4 weeks with a tremendous HC and staff that was hired with the number 1 goal of beating GB.
We went farther that year then you did last year. You are so proud of a four week span! That's all you guys gloat about, how you beat us twice in four weeks.Big Deal! Yet we have been beating you for 90 years!!!!! 90 years, pal. Boy if it was the other way around you beat us more in 90 years you guys would be coming all over yourselves!!! You can have your 4 weeks.. I'll keep enjoying the 90 years! Keep on trying to catch up I think it will take 7 years of wins!!! Again the year you laugh at the Bears for .....you did worst than the Bears. We went farther than you, so you guys most have really sucked last year!!!

“DA BEARS FAN!”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#1348 Aug 4, 2012
eric wrote:
<quoted text>They were saying Jarel Worthy is having a terrific camp and has shown he has an explosive first step.IF that keeps up,there is your replacement for Cullen Jenkins and the main problem of GB defense last year fixed for the most part.I get why you and pakluv1 have to keep expressing how GB defense sucks and bash the Packers for losing in the playoffs the year after winning the SB ect, keep telling your self that ( if it makes you feel better) and who knows, but, dont count on GB defense being nearly as bad as last year and with that offense,this is one tough team to beat and this year,im sure they will have an attitude after last years loss.
The reason we keep bringing up about the packers Defense sucking ...is because they do.It was the worst in the NFL last year.
ezg357

Madera, CA

#1349 Aug 4, 2012
eric wrote:
<quoted text>There is so much upside with the 2 of them,Im sure they will adjust to it with some playing time.I wouldnt be a bit surprised if Erik Walden was named the starter for the first half of this year coming up and Perry taking the spot by mid year.That is the one thing almost every rookie ive heard talk say.The biggest adjustment is the speed of the game in the NFL
I agree with you a 100% I followed them both in collage. when the Packers picked Parry I said darn they got a good player & in the second round to also get Worthy I was saying what was he still doing on the board. I know some experts has said Worthy takes some plays off But what I seen of him in collage I didnt see it. You know I think a lot of the times a rookies gets with the Vets for the first time & they get a little timid being around them. & after a week or so they start settling in & adjust to the game speed. I do think both are strong & fast players.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1351 Aug 4, 2012
ezg357 wrote:
During my three days at Packers camp,
I always knew you were a closet Packer fan or you had a severe case of Packer Envy! I can't tell you how much joy it brings me to know you spent 3 days at PACKER camp. Even a moron like you has some hope if you had the good sense to spend days watching the NFL's best team.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1352 Aug 4, 2012
ezg357 wrote:
I know there are high hopes for both players considering the way the Packers played pass defense in 2011. If we're still having this conversation in December, you would have a right to be disappointed. In the meantime, however, let's dial back the expectations just a bit. lol Yes just a bit Little things to worry about.
Moron, when will you learn to write like an adult? You are the perfect example of a Viking fan, most of whom are illiterate idiots! LOL
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1353 Aug 4, 2012
ezg357 wrote:
I hear the the PAckers rookies are not good well in camp lol.>>The seek button delivered a Wisconsin sports talk radio station during the drive west Wednesday night.
WTF? What the hell are trying to say? Do you see why everybody knows you are a moron? Try to read what you wrote! Does that make sense to you? Because I guarantee it doesn't make sense to anybody else. You are an imbecile!
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1354 Aug 4, 2012
ezg357 wrote:
<quoted text>I know I did read he was having a good Rookie Camp but with the Vets now in Camp Worthy & Parry are both having a problem with the speed on the game. That news article above come from ESPN sports.
Are you going to continue writing at your second grade level and expect people to believe any of your foolishness?

How stupid do people have to be in order to be swayed by the irrational ramblings of an imbecile? I don't what is funnier. The fact that you are so incredibly stupid or the fact that you think there are people even stupider than you?
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1355 Aug 4, 2012
packluv1 wrote:
<quoted text>We went farther that year then you did last year.
That is hilarious. The Bears didn't go anywhere but home. They all must live far from Chicago. That would be be further. LOL
ezg357

Madera, CA

#1356 Aug 4, 2012
GBPfan wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF? What the hell are trying to say? Do you see why everybody knows you are a moron? Try to read what you wrote! Does that make sense to you? Because I guarantee it doesn't make sense to anybody else. You are an imbecile!
GBPfan I dont have a problem saying I like the Packers two picks I seen them play in collage. & I know playing with the Vets for the first time can be intimidating . Tell me how can you not understand that. GBPfan Grow up. Your really one SOB that doesnt have common scents for a guy that claims he has multiple college degrees. lol
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1357 Aug 4, 2012
ezg357 wrote:
<quoted text>I agree with you a 100% I followed them both in collage. when the Packers picked Parry I said darn they got a good player & in the second round to also get Worthy I was saying what was he still doing on the board. I know some experts has said Worthy takes some plays off But what I seen of him in collage I didnt see it. You know I think a lot of the times a rookies gets with the Vets for the first time & they get a little timid being around them. & after a week or so they start settling in & adjust to the game speed. I do think both are strong & fast players.
Thanks for the second grader perspective on the Packers. As much as we enjoy you gushing over the talent on the Packers, we really don't need it. The literate and knowledgeable football experts agree that the Packers are the number one ranked team in the NFL. It's nice to have morons like you agree, but it doesn't add anything to the opinion of the people that have some intelligence.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1358 Aug 4, 2012
ezg357 wrote:
<quoted text>I was saying what was he still doing on the board. I know some experts has said Worthy takes some plays off But what I seen of him in collage I didnt see it. You know I think a lot of the times a rookies gets with the Vets for the first time & they get a little timid being around them. & after a week or so they start settling in & adjust to the game speed. I do think both are strong & fast players.
How can you write at such an infantile level and expect anybody to take you seriously? Do you actually believe anybody can read your posts without laughing at you?
eric

Marshfield, WI

#1359 Aug 5, 2012
packluv1 wrote:
<quoted text>We went farther that year then you did last year. You are so proud of a four week span! That's all you guys gloat about, how you beat us twice in four weeks.Big Deal! Yet we have been beating you for 90 years!!!!! 90 years, pal. Boy if it was the other way around you beat us more in 90 years you guys would be coming all over yourselves!!! You can have your 4 weeks.. I'll keep enjoying the 90 years! Keep on trying to catch up I think it will take 7 years of wins!!! Again the year you laugh at the Bears for .....you did worst than the Bears. We went farther than you, so you guys most have really sucked last year!!!
Good you can keep your barely beating us an average of 1 a year,( considering most of your domination was in the mid `1900s,) and ill gladly take our 4 week span,SB victory.You went further,BUT, you didnt get the job done! YOU LOST TO YOUR RIVAL! YOUR RIVAL COST YOU THE SB! Thats worse then anything Green Bay did last year.
eric

Marshfield, WI

#1360 Aug 5, 2012
packluv1 wrote:
<quoted text> The reason we keep bringing up about the packers Defense sucking ...is because they do.It was the worst in the NFL last year.
They will be much improved and that scares you being you admitting it.A Powerful Offense,a great qb,WR,TE and now an improved Defense.No pass rush was the biggest by far reason why GB didnt go further last year and that should be improved and if im right and it is,GB is much better and dangerous then last year and that my friend scares you! Chi defense always very good,but, starting to show its age a bit and they dont have alot of depth.Urlacher goes down,its over.If Briggs goes down,it will be tougher but Chi can still deal with it.If you vet secondary player ( name excapes me at this second and it shouldnt i like the guy,very good ballplayer) goes down,where the depth there?
eric

Marshfield, WI

#1361 Aug 5, 2012
ezg357 wrote:
<quoted text>I agree with you a 100% I followed them both in collage. when the Packers picked Parry I said darn they got a good player & in the second round to also get Worthy I was saying what was he still doing on the board. I know some experts has said Worthy takes some plays off But what I seen of him in collage I didnt see it. You know I think a lot of the times a rookies gets with the Vets for the first time & they get a little timid being around them. & after a week or so they start settling in & adjust to the game speed. I do think both are strong & fast players.
I know what you mean,I thought the same DAMN when Chicago drafted McKellan ( OLB/DE Boise State) but i have read/and heard,CHi wants to use him on the Defensive line,where GB would have used him at OLB spot opposite Clay Mathews.It will never be or cant be proven,But,ill always wonder where he would be more successful in Chi at DE being as hes what 27-280 at most or opposite CM? We will never know for sure,but, he would have fit GB nicely and Chi should end up with a high motor,high energy guy,im just not sure if the size factor will go against him on a Dline,time will tell i guess.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1362 Aug 5, 2012
ezg357 wrote:
<quoted text>GBPfan I dont have a problem saying I like the Packers two picks I seen them play in collage. & I know playing with the Vets for the first time can be intimidating . Tell me how can you not understand that. GBPfan Grow up. Your really one SOB that doesnt have common scents for a guy that claims he has multiple college degrees. lol
Because our drafts picks never play in a "collage"! The people that know what a "collage" is also know you are a complete moron. Those that don't know are apparently grade school dropouts like you. Since most of us made the majority of our collages in grade school, I can only assume you didn't attend grade school for very long. When did you drop out? Furthermore, your random use of punctuation and capitalization makes everything you write an exercise in deciphering what you wrote into something an adult would write.

BTW if I did have "common scents" would that be a pleasant or an unpleasant odor? A lot of common scents kinda stink, so I'm guessing it's unpleasant.

Seriously, you are a moron! anybody with a grade school education knows it simply from the childish way you write. Just like when I read something written by a second grader, I always have to guess what the hell you mean. Sorry, I take that back. Most second graders write better than you. I didn't mean to insult second graders.

“DA BEARS FAN!”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#1363 Aug 5, 2012
GBPfan wrote:
<quoted text>
Because our drafts picks never play in a "collage"! The people that know what a "collage" is also know you are a complete moron. Those that don't know are apparently grade school dropouts like you. Since most of us made the majority of our collages in grade school, I can only assume you didn't attend grade school for very long. When did you drop out? Furthermore, your random use of punctuation and capitalization makes everything you write an exercise in deciphering what you wrote into something an adult would write.
BTW if I did have "common scents" would that be a pleasant or an unpleasant odor? A lot of common scents kinda stink, so I'm guessing it's unpleasant.
Seriously, you are a moron! anybody with a grade school education knows it simply from the childish way you write. Just like when I read something written by a second grader, I always have to guess what the hell you mean. Sorry, I take that back. Most second graders write better than you. I didn't mean to insult second graders.
You really have some issues to write all that because of a simple misspelled word. You love to put other people down every chance you get. You are a very insecure person.

“DA BEARS FAN!”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#1364 Aug 5, 2012
eric wrote:
<quoted text>Good you can keep your barely beating us an average of 1 a year,( considering most of your domination was in the mid `1900s,) and ill gladly take our 4 week span,SB victory.You went further,BUT, you didnt get the job done! YOU LOST TO YOUR RIVAL! YOUR RIVAL COST YOU THE SB! Thats worse then anything Green Bay did last year.
I'll take the 90 years of winning over our RIVAL and keep adding to it! New year pal and we will be adding to the 90 years to that lead this year. It's a Rivalry do you get it?....it's History. In the 90 years the two teams have lined up to play the BEARS have won more games. That's what rivalry is about. Spin it any way you what, it doesn't fly. You can't change it, nice try.Say anything you want about the Bears but we still have more wins against our RIVALS!

“DA BEARS FAN!”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#1365 Aug 5, 2012
eric wrote:
<quoted text>They will be much improved and that scares you being you admitting it.A Powerful Offense,a great qb,WR,TE and now an improved Defense.No pass rush was the biggest by far reason why GB didnt go further last year and that should be improved and if im right and it is,GB is much better and dangerous then last year and that my friend scares you! Chi defense always very good,but, starting to show its age a bit and they dont have alot of depth.Urlacher goes down,its over.If Briggs goes down,it will be tougher but Chi can still deal with it.If you vet secondary player ( name excapes me at this second and it shouldnt i like the guy,very good ballplayer) goes down,where the depth there?
# 54 went to the pro bowl last year, again. We are better than the pack in almost every phase of the game, and let's see if we passed you guys in the passing game! Watch out the BEARS ARE COMING!!
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1366 Aug 5, 2012
packluv1 wrote:
<quoted text> You really have some issues to write all that because of a simple misspelled word. You love to put other people down every chance you get. You are a very insecure person.
Yeah, but at least I can write above a second grade level! Apparently you like talking football with morons like ezg. Since your understanding of football is only slightly higher than his, I guess I understand why. However, if I want to talk football with people like you and ezg I can simply go to the nearest grade school. Even the Viking fans are smart enough to shun that moron. Why do you think he's here all the time?

“DA BEARS FAN!”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#1367 Aug 5, 2012
GBPfan wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, but at least I can write above a second grade level! Apparently you like talking football with morons like ezg. Since your understanding of football is only slightly higher than his, I guess I understand why. However, if I want to talk football with people like you and ezg I can simply go to the nearest grade school. Even the Viking fans are smart enough to shun that moron. Why do you think he's here all the time?
I think you should stay away from grade schools, really.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NFL Football Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Vikings reinstate Peterson despite abuse charge 12 min Tree Branch Disci... 6
Raiders' Charles Woodson: 'We're not very good' 3 hr Huh 5
Vincent Brown worked out for Oakland Raiders, c... 3 hr Huh 2
Adrian Peterson Indicted For Child Abuse 3 hr Switch Hitter AP 76
Peyton Manning's Wife Ashley Thompson Part of M... 4 hr Victor 3
Broncos fend off Chiefs 24-17 with goal-line stand 4 hr Dale 4
2012 NFL Free Agency: Cleveland Browns Join the... (Mar '12) 4 hr ClevelandSteamer 42
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

NFL Football People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••