Local News: Valley Ford, CA 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

Minor Football League chief: We'd welcome Vick

Posted in the NFL Football Forum

Comments (Page 3)

Showing posts 41 - 60 of146
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Rose M

Lexington, SC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45
Jul 10, 2009
 
Rose M wrote:
pass it on
DOWHATITDO2U2

Detroit, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#46
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

There is no reason for me to chat with hateful "post copying" idiots. Find your own voice and don't worry about what I say. That idiot is a disgrace and a 'wannabe'. Give it a few minutes for the idiot to deny that.
DOWHATITDO2U2

Detroit, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#47
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

GUESS WHO wrote:
<quoted text>I do agree with your comment however Vick did pay for the care of the dogs, how many times should he have to do that.
I just answered the question asked. I don't think its unreasonable that the he was required to do this. If you mean 'pay for his crimes' in the literal sense I personally think its time to for it to end.

By the way, though we may not always agree THANKS for the actual exchanges of thoughts/opinions. These forums have become so filled with nothing more than rants and personal attacks about the Posters, that most of the time its hard to actually find a 'conversation' going on about the topic of Mike Vick.
Rose M

Lexington, SC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Betty wrote:
<quoted text>
She's not a big fan of introspection. There IS a post where she says that there is no MORAL, reason, can you believe that?; no MORAL reason not to reinstate Vick. She'll deny that she said that also. GIve it a few minutes.
BINGO
Pobrecito/poor baby
I just think that the person should have expected that kind of thing or was probably warned of them. The person coming on the property I'm sure knew that the ring was there and that traps were set in accordance with the ring. It's just silly, enter at your own risk, right? And how could Vick be such a great player when he can't even respect his own career? You saying that he 'crapped' on it was very well said.!:)
Rose M

Lexington, SC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#49
Jul 10, 2009
 
Rose wrote:
<quoted text>
OMG-Are you comparing what Stewart did as opposed to what Vick did which was brutalizing and mutiliating innocent and helpless animals to a torturous death? Please, please think about what you are saying. How can you possible compare tearing animals apart to Stewart's crime? She did not HURT anyone but herself and her image and/or reputation. What MV did was torture helpless animals to their death while he enjoyed hearing the screaming pains of those animals while they were dying? Can't you understand that? Doesn't that make sense to you? You are comparing the death of animals to a stock market incident. You should know better than that even if you are uneducated or whatever.
Never try to reason with unreasonable people.
DOWHATITDO2U2

Detroit, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#50
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

GUESS WHO wrote:
<quoted text>If what you are saying is true there would be no need for discussion, I do understand that Martha Stewart crime was not the same as Vick however the fact is they both committed crimes, served time for the crime they committed Martha Stewart was allowed to return to her career, do you feel that was wrong for her to be able to return to a position of notoriety even though she is a convicted felon.
"Returning to a position of notoriety as a convicted felon"? There are many who do, so your point is well taken. I'm sure the argument will become that the crimes are not comparable (funny thing is, Barb Hathaway just said this earlier when comparing Vick to Dahmer).

"As she faced possible jail time, Martha Stewart invoked the name of Nelson Mandela, South Africa's persecuted anti-apartheid hero, saying "many, many good people have gone to prison." "

Go figure.


Rose M

Lexington, SC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51
Jul 10, 2009
 
Any Gracie fans here?
Gracie was Jane.
http://badrap-blog.blogspot.com/2009/07/graci...
Rose M

Lexington, SC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52
Jul 10, 2009
 
Compare Stewart to Vick?
No comment needed
GUESS WHO
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#53
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rose wrote:
<quoted text>
OMG-Are you comparing what Stewart did as opposed to what Vick did which was brutalizing and mutiliating innocent and helpless animals to a torturous death? Please, please think about what you are saying. How can you possible compare tearing animals apart to Stewart's crime? She did not HURT anyone but herself and her image and/or reputation. What MV did was torture helpless animals to their death while he enjoyed hearing the screaming pains of those animals while they were dying? Can't you understand that? Doesn't that make sense to you? You are comparing the death of animals to a stock market incident. You should know better than that even if you are uneducated or whatever.
You need to read the post again, what I responded to was a comment that was made stating that a person should not return to notoriety being a convicted felon, my comment had absolutely nothing to do with the crime that was committed only that each of these individuals are convicted felons, and one has been allowed to return to a position of notoriety (with no problem) and the other should not be allowed to do the same. But for some reason I think you already knew that
GUESS WHO
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DOWHATITDO2U2 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Returning to a position of notoriety as a convicted felon"? There are many who do, so your point is well taken. I'm sure the argument will become that the crimes are not comparable (funny thing is, Barb Hathaway just said this earlier when comparing Vick to Dahmer).
"As she faced possible jail time, Martha Stewart invoked the name of Nelson Mandela, South Africa's persecuted anti-apartheid hero, saying "many, many good people have gone to prison." "
Go figure.
If you read the post I made I never said anything about the crimes that were committed only that they are both convicted felons, simply because it had been stated by another poster said that a convicted felon should not return to notoriety, but at the same time I knew that they would come back with some silly crap meaning I was comparing one crime to the other whereas I never even mentioned the crime. I read the post concerning Jeffrey Dahmer being compared to Vick , but I didn't take it seriously I truly thought it was a joke LOL
GUESS WHO
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#55
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rose M wrote:
<quoted text>Never try to reason with unreasonable people.
You couldn't be more right, just can't reason with unreasonable people
Manuel

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#56
Jul 10, 2009
 
Rose M wrote:
Any Gracie fans here?
Gracie was Jane.
http://badrap-blog.blogspot.com/2009/07/graci...
OMG, I am Gracie's biggest fan!
GUESS WHO
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#57
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

2

2

1

DOWHATITDO2U2 wrote:
<quoted text>
I just answered the question asked. I don't think its unreasonable that the he was required to do this. If you mean 'pay for his crimes' in the literal sense I personally think its time to for it to end.
By the way, though we may not always agree THANKS for the actual exchanges of thoughts/opinions. These forums have become so filled with nothing more than rants and personal attacks about the Posters, that most of the time its hard to actually find a 'conversation' going on about the topic of Mike Vick.
I don't understand why you think that I don't agree with the comments you make I don't recall there being a comment that you have made that I didn't agree with. I believe he should have paid also, but hey enough is enough.
Badaboom
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#58
Jul 10, 2009
 
Martha Stewart is bascially self-employed and she didn't harm animals.
Why don' you guys ban Martha? I don't care.
Badaboom
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#59
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I think a Vick fan will compare him to just about anything. Its not going to change anything.
Manuel
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#60
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I can't imagine why anyone would want bad publicity for their team. He is still a disgrace and feels no remorse for the dogs he killed. Allowing him back in the NFL sends a negative message to young people. The dead dogs do not have a second chance and neither should he.
Martha Srewart
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#61
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

I resent being compared to that thug.
Dejaview

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

Rose wrote:
<quoted text>
OMG-Are you comparing what Stewart did as opposed to what Vick did which was brutalizing and mutiliating innocent and helpless animals to a torturous death? Please, please think about what you are saying. How can you possible compare tearing animals apart to Stewart's crime? She did not HURT anyone but herself and her image and/or reputation. What MV did was torture helpless animals to their death while he enjoyed hearing the screaming pains of those animals while they were dying? Can't you understand that? Doesn't that make sense to you? You are comparing the death of animals to a stock market incident. You should know better than that even if you are uneducated or whatever.
Yes they did compare it and it is not the first time as we well know
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/no-nfl-for-m...
Rose

Miami, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#63
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

GUESS WHO wrote:
<quoted text>You couldn't be more right, just can't reason with unreasonable people
And BTW, do you consider yourself reasonable after all the ridiculous comments you have made, the last of which you were comparing Martha Stewart's felonious act to that of MV's heinous and barbaric torture he inflicted on helpless animals?
Martha Srewart
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64
Jul 10, 2009
 

Judged:

1

Thats what I want to know.
Sign up to receive email when someone responds
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 41 - 60 of146
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Daily Horoscope for December 4

Taurus

Someone simply isn't being realistic or practical today, Taurus. He or she seems to be lost in a dream world of wishful thinking and idealism, none of which has much to do with what's really going on. Unfortunately, they won't want to hear any of this and may even manipulate the situation so they don't have to listen to your opinions. Be careful when dealing with this character and try not to get sucked into this desire to escape reality at all costs.

Get your Horoscope »