Teacher Has Sex with Student to Help Overcome His "Shyness"

Sir_Sonic Airys Dark wrote:

bring my the Teacher so i may kick he\she's ass
at my friends old high school a male Teacher
did that but one day he went to far. and tryd it on the wrong girl i was younger back then but i heard he mite of been cut from ear to ear.
like when i found out a Teacher was tuching my male friend when he was younger i found out what school he moved to and told ever one in that school. as u can see I HATE ROCK SPIDER'S

genevieve wrote:

<quoted text>
what about omnibenevolent?

Curious Me wrote:

<quoted text>
Excuse me, but, I really must say that you are, apparently, way too stupid to be commenting here.
Try reading my post a little more carefully, that is, if you're capable.
No, better yet, beat it, you punk·ass moron.
This thread has nothing to do with male teachers or female students.

Queue wrote:

<quoted text>
Never!!!!!!!!
:-|

stickman9436 wrote:

<quoted text>
GEEZE Curious, I read your post and your position is as clear as mud bring me that teacher condom knowledge wtf. boy is not girl man is not women no shit thanks for clearing that up in your mind you might be clear but that particular passage isn't all that informative so why don't you go back and take a look before you go flying off the handle at someone ya dumb ass and remember peace is not war lol

Curious Me wrote:

<quoted text>.
Why don't you read the entire thread so you have a chance understanding my post.
If you read me from outside of context, or if you just plain have trouble reading, then take it sideways up until it stops and and then snap it off at the end.
There's MUD in your eye.
It's called reading comprehension, NOT reading compensation.

genevieve wrote:

<quoted text>
I suppose then that the opposite would be "omni-selfishness"?

stickman9436 wrote:

<quoted text>
I can read just fine Curious perhaps the error is on the part of the writer. Let me try and explain how a logica mind thinks. The topic is a school teacher having sex with a 14 year old boy Ok? Now that is against the law. So someone writes "I'm very damnd·sure that having sex with a reasonably attractive female adult, when I was 14yrs of age, would have required a skillfull, knowingly sensitive helpfull approach on the part of that angel of mercy, my TEACHER." What does that lead a logical mind to think, hhuuummm well since we are talking about how wrong sex is between teacher and student and an individual makes the following statement, one would believe that the writer of the statement supports student teacher sex at the most or perhaps given the benefit of the doubt believes that since the teacher had sex with the student the student at a minimum should be thankful the teacher was skillful and caring when she rapped him. I don't know tell me what other conclusion could be drawn form that statement in the context of why student teacher sex is wrong. That the writer further supports the first paraph with using condoms and having wet dreams about there 4th grade English teacher. So What I gather from the writing other than the writer thinks there witty with trash like boy is not girl and man is not women is the writer relishes the thought of doing there teacher and that this particular incident isn't bad I mean what else can you conclude. So perhaps the mud is in your brain because your writings really don't give the reader much of a choice but to believe that the author really isn't opposed to student teacher sex.
Pehaps the writer believes themselves to be witty and smart by writing in circles and being vauge well it isn't. So either the writer doesn't have a clear grasp of reality or just plain ignorant. So why don't you explain yourself as to why you think an artful skillful teacher having sex with a 14 year old boy is a good thing.

Reallist wrote:

Only in the United States. I really pity you Americans with your inane laws and over protective zealots who disempower rather that protect. Producing young adults with no experience of managing risk or taking responsibility for their own actions.
This young lad took advantage of an opportunity that most boys only get to fantasize about. His teacher no doubt relished in the sweetness of his youth and newly minted sexuality. Both were discrete enough to keep the affair secret for many months. The real harm will come from the intervention of "well meaning" state officials. Who will brand her as a pervert and him as a victim, scarring both of them for life.
Grow up America.

Reallist wrote:

Only in the United States. I really pity you Americans with your inane laws and over protective zealots who disempower rather that protect. Producing young adults with no experience of managing risk or taking responsibility for their own actions.
This young lad took advantage of an opportunity that most boys only get to fantasize about. His teacher no doubt relished in the sweetness of his youth and newly minted sexuality. Both were discrete enough to keep the affair secret for many months. The real harm will come from the intervention of "well meaning" state officials. Who will brand her as a pervert and him as a victim, scarring both of them for life.
Grow up America.

Reallist wrote:

Only in the United States. I really pity you Americans with your inane laws and over protective zealots who disempower rather that protect. Producing young adults with no experience of managing risk or taking responsibility for their own actions.
This young lad took advantage of an opportunity that most boys only get to fantasize about. His teacher no doubt relished in the sweetness of his youth and newly minted sexuality. Both were discrete enough to keep the affair secret for many months. The real harm will come from the intervention of "well meaning" state officials. Who will brand her as a pervert and him as a victim, scarring both of them for life.
Grow up America.

Reallist wrote:

Only in the United States. I really pity you Americans with your inane laws and over protective zealots who disempower rather that protect. Producing young adults with no experience of managing risk or taking responsibility for their own actions.
This young lad took advantage of an opportunity that most boys only get to fantasize about. His teacher no doubt relished in the sweetness of his youth and newly minted sexuality. Both were discrete enough to keep the affair secret for many months. The real harm will come from the intervention of "well meaning" state officials. Who will brand her as a pervert and him as a victim, scarring both of them for life.
Grow up America.

Curious Me wrote:

<quoted text>
I do NOT think that the standard for WOMEN should be the same as for MEN.
So many things are different about the human FEMALE situation as opposed to the human MALE situation in modern cultures.
I, also, whish to make clear that the question of MEN 'touching' BOYS has nothing to do with this thread, and should be condemed in ANY society.
I acyually don't codone dropping the legal age below 18, but I, also, do not condemn as harshly, when a woman crosses that legal boundary...not by a long shot.

Curious Me wrote:

<quoted text>
This is a discussion thread concerning the subject as stated in the title of the thread.
I really don't give a rats·ass whether the creator of this thread is appalled by such things.
It may or may not have been wrong, although I don't happen to think that it was all that bad.
That was not the main thrust of my post, and,frankly,
no, you could not have been to swift if you failed to comprehend that.
I clearly stated, also, that I was referring to 4th period, not 4th grade.
In my opinion the effect, that this sort of thing, would have on a young male is not even close to the effect that it would have a female of the same age.
I'm not really saying that, what had occured, could not lead to the possibilty of one problem or another, because I really don't care.
My point was to say that that it is WRONG to equate what happened to that boy of fourteen to the same deed, had the genders been reversed.
Boys are NOT like girls, in this regard.
Further more, this thread is not about men touching boys, which is why I blew up at your buddy the other moron.

stickman9436 wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you for clearing that up. I agree with you that it is wrong for any teacher to have sex with any student. Your right I miss read the "4th period grade thing.
I have to respectfully disagree with your assumption that the trama of being raped is any less tramatic for a boy than a girl. I believe the amount of trama suffered will be similar the differences between boys and girls, I believe, will be the resulting behaviors after the rape. I am certainly not an expert in the subject but, I believe the girls will externalize the trama that they felt fromt the rape. While boys will keep the tramatic event and the resulting feeling intenalized. This may make the boy victims more cold isolated, suicidal homocidaldevelope drug habits be abusive to the point of being cruel and sadomistic turn to criminal behavior. Girl victims will be more vocal depressed sucidial maybe become promisicious [sp], more wreckless.
Just my humble opinion.