John Mark Karr is Guilty - But of What?

John Karr and the college professor who published the emails may be after the tabloid money. The college professor has already produced 3 documentaries on the murder. I hope not for the sake of the Ramsey family.

mary densmore wrote:

John Karr and the college professor who published the emails may be after the tabloid money. The college professor has already produced 3 documentaries on the murder. I hope not for the sake of the Ramsey family.

The college professor made those documentaries to highlight the deficiencies of the Boulder police investigation and the media coverage of the case. As a result of this work, and re-examination of the case by Lou Smit, incontrovertible evidence that an intruder was responsible was determined. I don't think fiscal gain plays a role, rather obtaining justice for a murdered child.

What I am suggesting is that Karr could have received more information about the murder from the professor than was made public. (i.e I think the professor may have been feeding him information for motives not yet known).

On Nancy Grace tonight, the handwriting expert says the ransom note handwriting matches John Karr's significantly..he found 10 or better letter matches and when he finds 10 or better he's convinced....!!!
Gosh, I wish this case would be solved and justice for JB would happen!
Again, he says it's a match!

Foxyloxy wrote:

On Nancy Grace tonight, the handwriting expert says the ransom note handwriting matches John Karr's significantly..he found 10 or better letter matches and when he finds 10 or better he's convinced....!!!
Gosh, I wish this case would be solved and justice for JB would happen!
Again, he says it's a match!

The only thing that will convict this guy is the DNA match. Why would the ex-wife give him an alibi??? There is something fishy about this!

EVIDENCE
1. Teddy Bear- When his possessions were searched, a photograph of a teddy bear was found. This teddy bear was traced to be the same exact one that Jonbenet received from a reported “excessive” fan.- NOTE-Proves he has been to her pageants, thus suspecting an obsession and official connection between the two before the crime occurred, establishing a before, not after obsession.2. Yearbook- John Karr signed a year book “I shall be the conqueror” The ransom note is signed “Victory, SBTC” the SBTC is said to be Shall Be The Conquer” and victory meaning so.
3. Handwriting- His A’s had a box; his e’s had the same tilt. They highlighted the Ls he made and the one’s in the ransom note and I gasped. IDENTICAL. The ransom note handwriting and his are reported identical.
4. Tai Reporters- have reportedly been taking liberties with the details of the case. The school pick up was a rumor started as well as the druging detail, thus eliminating the few tails of his innocence.
5. Professor statement- The professor who had been receiving e-mails for four years had stated he knew things that were verified as unreleased evidence and some details only a killer could know. Plus the suspicion involved in order to arrest him.
6. Obsession- he was obsessed. This is obvious. The claim of it being an accident follows with the killing seeming “staged” and over exaggerated. The finger marks on her neck could mean he strangled her first, and then staged the ropes because they were tied loosely and not looking for effect-obviously done after.
7. Pedo-analysis guy – A convicted pedophile who now serves as a Pedo-Analysis man has said his behavior matches the hundreds of men that he sees every day. The weak shy almost childlike attitude is seen as very predator-like and he said I have no doubt this is the man, I have worked with hundreds of them, and he is one, I’m sure of it”
8. Previous home in Conyers, GA when The Ramsey’s lived in Atlanta while Jonbenet did pageants, he would have the opportunity to run into them, attend her pageants, and know them somewhat personally (if only on his side)
9. Jonbent’s pageants are all over-meaning he definitely might have been there-hardcore undeniable proof is the Teddy bear.
10. DNA-the dna points to a white male. He is white and male. The DNA is the only link to prove him guilty however, he still may be guilty. The DNA is only partial.
11. Physics- A physic drew a drawling two days after Jonbenet was killed. When compared, the two are identical. From other cases, regardless of your belief in physic people, it has proven true.
check the pics out here:
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/com...
To me, this case is solved. Either Karr is it, or he is covering up for someone, using all the stuff and data he's been told. I can't believe you people are so doubting. How can you deny all this obviousevidence. Think about it. Before DNA, he'd be a dead man by now. It all points to him, and there's little little doubt besides false reports, and a lie by his ex-wife(I know this because they found a hotel bill located near Boulder that week in 1996) oh I should have added that to the already long list of why he's guilty.

Angel wrote:

EVIDENCE
1. Teddy Bear- When his possessions were searched, a photograph of a teddy bear was found. This teddy bear was traced to be the same exact one that Jonbenet received from a reported “excessive” fan.- NOTE-Proves he has been to her pageants, thus suspecting an obsession and official connection between the two before the crime occurred, establishing a before, not after obsession.2. Yearbook- John Karr signed a year book “I shall be the conqueror” The ransom note is signed “Victory, SBTC” the SBTC is said to be Shall Be The Conquer” and victory meaning so.
3. Handwriting- His A’s had a box; his e’s had the same tilt. They highlighted the Ls he made and the one’s in the ransom note and I gasped. IDENTICAL. The ransom note handwriting and his are reported identical.
4. Tai Reporters- have reportedly been taking liberties with the details of the case. The school pick up was a rumor started as well as the druging detail, thus eliminating the few tails of his innocence.
5. Professor statement- The professor who had been receiving e-mails for four years had stated he knew things that were verified as unreleased evidence and some details only a killer could know. Plus the suspicion involved in order to arrest him.
6. Obsession- he was obsessed. This is obvious. The claim of it being an accident follows with the killing seeming “staged” and over exaggerated. The finger marks on her neck could mean he strangled her first, and then staged the ropes because they were tied loosely and not looking for effect-obviously done after.
7. Pedo-analysis guy – A convicted pedophile who now serves as a Pedo-Analysis man has said his behavior matches the hundreds of men that he sees every day. The weak shy almost childlike attitude is seen as very predator-like and he said I have no doubt this is the man, I have worked with hundreds of them, and he is one, I’m sure of it”
8. Previous home in Conyers, GA when The Ramsey’s lived in Atlanta while Jonbenet did pageants, he would have the opportunity to run into them, attend her pageants, and know them somewhat personally (if only on his side)
9. Jonbent’s pageants are all over-meaning he definitely might have been there-hardcore undeniable proof is the Teddy bear.
10. DNA-the dna points to a white male. He is white and male. The DNA is the only link to prove him guilty however, he still may be guilty. The DNA is only partial.
11. Physics- A physic drew a drawling two days after Jonbenet was killed. When compared, the two are identical. From other cases, regardless of your belief in physic people, it has proven true.
check the pics out here:
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/com...
To me, this case is solved. Either Karr is it, or he is covering up for someone, using all the stuff and data he's been told. I can't believe you people are so doubting. How can you deny all this obviousevidence. Think about it. Before DNA, he'd be a dead man by now. It all points to him, and there's little little doubt besides false reports, and a lie by his ex-wife(I know this because they found a hotel bill located near Boulder that week in 1996) oh I should have added that to the already long list of why he's guilty.

The Teddy Bear was given to Jon Benet after she won a pageant. The pageant people wrote a letter to the Colorado police verifying this. This was cleared by Colorado years ago. Tracy has a hand in that rumor, he showed the photo to his students in his class.

Do you have a link about the hotel ticket from 1996?

Why would his X wife lie, she has a restraining order against him to keep him away from her and his children. She is just doing what is the right thing to do so the real killer will be caught. YOU THINK?

None of your evidence would convict anyone in a court of law. A confession won't convict either.

Jon Benet got the teddy bear from Pageant officials. That has been verified. Professor Tracy showed that photo to his students and started that rumor you are repeating as fact.

One thing important to remember, a pedophile would have sex with their victim, not use a paint bruch handle.

Nothing you have listed would convict anyone in a court of law.

What hotel bill? Got a link?

The X wife is doing the right thing, she want's the real killers found. She has a restraining order against Karr, she has no love for him and there is nothing fishy about her actions.

If we are casting aspersion then John Karr is guilty of looking like Norman Bates. am I wrong? Look at the eyes... man this dude did something wrong to someone.

http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/200... http://www.turdthursday.com/normanBates.jpg It's uncanny!

well he is def guilty of looking like Norman Bates yes...

He's guilty of posing ... oh my god, he has beautiful eyes but he's always striking a pose!

Jan,my guess would be that you are easily hypnotized maybe by a certain network TV LAND perhap? becareful of this...http://www.clubperversi on.com/hypnotized-girls/

Shelly-USA wrote:

Jon Benet got the teddy bear from Pageant officials. That has been verified. Professor Tracy showed that photo to his students and started that rumor you are repeating as fact.
One thing important to remember, a pedophile would have sex with their victim, not use a paint bruch handle.
Nothing you have listed would convict anyone in a court of law.
What hotel bill? Got a link?
The X wife is doing the right thing, she want's the real killers found. She has a restraining order against Karr, she has no love for him and there is nothing fishy about her actions.

<One thing important to remember, a pedophile would have sex with their victim, not use a paint bruch handle.> Maybe, the killer wasn't a pedophile.
The BTK strangler never had sex with his victims. He also killed children. He would become aroused and would ejaculate from strangling of his victims.

caity wrote:

well he is def guilty of looking like Norman Bates yes...

Lol!

an american wrote:

Jan,my guess would be that you are easily hypnotized maybe by a certain network TV LAND perhap? becareful of this...http://www.clubperversi on.com/hypnotized-girls/

Oh, you tricked me before, didn't you? I'm sticking with Columbo and Mary Tyler Moore!

an american wrote:

Jan,my guess would be that you are easily hypnotized maybe by a certain network TV LAND perhap? becareful of this...http://www.clubperversi on.com/hypnotized-girls/

Is he accecpting new patients?

an american wrote:

If we are casting aspersion then John Karr is guilty of looking like Norman Bates. am I wrong? Look at the eyes... man this dude did something wrong to someone.

I said the same thing about him...someone compared him to Anthony Hopkins from Silence of the Lambs and I said...no, more like the guy from Psycho, Anthony Perkins!!!Scarey!

The wife did respond later that she wasn't sure about that.

The picture taken of the family in 1996 didn't include him. And none of the family would comment on it, so it's not like he just was the one taking the picture.

Other reports also say that he was staying with his brother that year. Who lives in Georgia.

The ropes were obviously added on later for dramatic effect. And a garotte and the ropes are used by pedos as like kinky toys, so its not odd.

Him saying it was an accident is partly true. He meant to take her, not kill her(at least at that time) and she most likely woke up or something caused difficulty in the kidnapping, and he panicked. Besides I wouldn't be saying no to his guiltiness until the DNA proves otherwise.

Okay, he's creeping me out now . . . but I'd kill for those eyelashes.