Actually, I used that article from TalkOrigins because YOU continued to assert that Nebraska Man was widely believed to be that of a human ancestor. It was not.<quoted text>
So what, slavish follower of origins.com .?
You don't get it? The info in that article IS NOT BEING DISPUTED BY ANYONE HERE, because it's correct. Get it, you bovine excrement filled waste of space?
It's interesting to note that you have to rely on 2 briefly misidentified fossils from almost 100 years ago -- that SCIENCE quickly, and correctly reclassified -- to use as your (I surmise) evidence against the Theory of Evolution.
Question: Are you a YEC? If so, do you have any POSITIVE evidence FOR your position?