What link? Are you delusional again?
You were the first to post a comment to the title article http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765571258/...
in The Desert News
Interesting. How much of that is global sea level and how much of that is differences in distribution of the rise?
Interesting that you don't address the two feet by mid century claim.
Reasoning: There is no such thing as an explosion. Prior to claimed explosion, the expansion ration of the gases was undetectable. Therefore the explosion cannot occur.
This sort of logic you use is so ludicrous I have to show an analogy to demonstrate the silliness.
The current acceleration of sea level is a NEGATIVE 0.06 mm/yr˛ that would have to increase to a POSITUVE 0.35 mm/yr˛ in order to get to the predicted value. That's nearly a seven fold increase in acceleration. Your analogy aside, when do you expect that to start happening? Every month that goes by that the current negative rate continues will drive that number up you know.
Two errors. One is that sea level has NOT been decreasing.
I didn't say it was, the chart I put up didn't say it was, nobody says sea level over the last 25 years is desreasing. You assume that's what I said, but it isn't.
A small noise' from higher rainfall temporarily leaving more water on land does not change the slope of the SIGNAL.
You're talking about the last year or two. I'm talking about the last 25 years. There is a difference you know.
Secondly, the expectation from paleoclimatology studies, GCM modeling and the acceleration of land bound ice decrease all show a 'doubling per n years' or exponential acceleration as feedbacks accumulate and take effect.
Oh yes, Dr. Hansen says sea level may rise as much as 5 meters by the end of the century and he cites the doubling per 10 years as a scenaario to get there. I have run the numbers on that, and by December 30th 2099 sea level would be going up nearly a millimeter per DAY. Now really, do you think that's possible? You seem to like analogies, so tell me if your car does 0 - 60 MPH in 10 seconds, do you think it will do 120 MMPH in 20 seconds? or 180 in 30?
A linear 'acceleration' over no time is totally silly nonsense. What we have come to expect from you.
Another analogy is the one about the farmer who picks up the calf every day figuring he'll be able to lift it as a full grown 2000 lb steer. You guys never run the numbers. You never ask yourselves the question, "Can this be true?"
The rest of your delusion are just more of the same so I will let them go. You have amply demonstrated your lack of education and knowledge of this and other subjects.
I run the numbers whenever they are available to me, and I usually find that there's a good deal of fudging and cherry picking from you side of things.