UN chief warns of 'incalculable' suffering without climate deal

If you REALLY BELIEVE, there is a GIANT INFRA RED HEATER like over the doors at a SAFEWAY in the winter, SO BIG, it MELTED TWO ICE CAPS and DISRUPTED THREE CONTINENTS,

and we couldn't ever even FIND it, told WHERE it IS
50,000

Told WHAT INFRA RED TO LOOK FOR

CO2's resonance

Told WHEN it had to be GOTTEN

(when the sun was over an area)

and HOW

simple shoulder refraction, it's a net reflector like a sunglass lens, only it holds in the LESS energetic light, the LOW energy light..

ALL the COMBINED TECHNOLOGIES on EARTH while flyinG jet PLANES INTO and OUT of the FACE of THIS LENS:

no infra red CAMERA DETECTS IT

no infra red SATELLITE LASER DETECTS IT

no ELECTRONIC JUNCTION THERMAL SENSOR DETECTS IT

no MECHANICAL THERMOMETER detects it

If you REALLY after all that don't understand there's no PRIMARY HADLEY CELL DISRUPTION

no PRIMARY HADLEY CELL VOLUME INCREASE ENOUGH TO SLING CONTINENT DISRUPTING ARCS OF HEAT

no GAS CHEMISTRY POLLUTION TRACKING indication of a PRIMARY circulation of air to FEED
this thing

UP AT where? 50,000 feet...

it probably WON'T do any good to tell you to go look up why the stars aren't twinkling harder at night as per optical telescopes, even binoculars, to a trained eye.

Scintillation. It's like intelligence and you, only THEY both have two Ls and two Is in them but you don't have any intelligence in you.

You have a parking lot to clean at a fast food place.

Northie:

Explain to us the mechanism by which enough heat was hidden in a KNOWN PLACE in the atmosphere: where the CO2 LAYER IS

and us not be able to ever find a thermometer that would measure it.

Is it still like you say, "it's too thin to be measured with a thermometer."

While it melted two ice caps and disrupted three continents.

Is that how it still is, so thin the electronic sensing element on the front of a jet plane can't get in there, it's like.. really really tiny, but....really really BIG?

Or, is it that NOW, we have new MANNIAN FISIKS and MANNIAN STATISTICS to just F*CK those old, USELESS LAWS OF LIGHT, HEAT,

fermion/boson conservation, screw that. S.C.R.E.W. that EINSTEIN DUDE

mike MANN and jUMBLIN jIm overTHREW that FOOL!

Tell us about that we'll work through about 4, to 10 more questions right after that one, you can "link me" to how all the thermal sensors on earth are broke, even our eyes are broken.

LoL. Our eyes and starlight's broken because if THAT STARLIGHT ISN'T BOUNCING AROUND from HEAT TURBULENCE

we'll need you to LINK us to how that got revoked, painthuffer.

I Am DigitaP wrote:

Northie:
Explain to us the mechanism by which enough heat was hidden in a KNOWN PLACE in the atmosphere: where the CO2 LAYER IS
and us not be able to ever find a thermometer that would measure it.
Is it still like you say, "it's too thin to be measured with a thermometer."
While it melted two ice caps and disrupted three continents.
Is that how it still is, so thin the electronic sensing element on the front of a jet plane can't get in there, it's like.. really really tiny, but....really really BIG?
Or, is it that NOW, we have new MANNIAN FISIKS and MANNIAN STATISTICS to just F*CK those old, USELESS LAWS OF LIGHT, HEAT,
fermion/boson conservation, screw that. S.C.R.E.W. that EINSTEIN DUDE
mike MANN and jUMBLIN jIm overTHREW that FOOL!
Tell us about that we'll work through about 4, to 10 more questions right after that one, you can "link me" to how all the thermal sensors on earth are broke, even our eyes are broken.
LoL. Our eyes and starlight's broken because if THAT STARLIGHT ISN'T BOUNCING AROUND from HEAT TURBULENCE
we'll need you to LINK us to how that got revoked, painthuffer.

Man, are you stupid! CO2 layer??????????

neighbour wrote:

<quoted text>
Man, are you stupid! CO2 layer??????????

yea hillbilly, you didnt hear you're shilling for a magic CO2 layer? Maybe that's what the cost of not getting any secondary schooling is but you've gotta pay it not me.

Oh and those kids whose lives you ruin by raising them up like Jed Clampett with ''thuh werld endin' all suddenlike, an' all....

It's not my job to educate you; it's to come here and humiliate you.

So blame your lack of education for life punking you repeatedly.

I Am DigitaP wrote:

<quoted text>
yea hillbilly, you didnt hear you're shilling for a magic CO2 layer? Maybe that's what the cost of not getting any secondary schooling is but you've gotta pay it not me.
Oh and those kids whose lives you ruin by raising them up like Jed Clampett with ''thuh werld endin' all suddenlike, an' all....
It's not my job to educate you; it's to come here and humiliate you.
So blame your lack of education for life punking you repeatedly.

easy der chawly, he just didn't "get it" not everyone gets sarcastic elitist indignation first time. took me awhile. why are you digitap?

The risk of climate change is incalculable, we just don't know enough about our complex, chaotic climate system to forecast climate change.

I Am DigitaP wrote:

<quoted text>
yea hillbilly, you didnt hear you're shilling for a magic CO2 layer? Maybe that's what the cost of not getting any secondary schooling is but you've gotta pay it not me.
Oh and those kids whose lives you ruin by raising them up like Jed Clampett with ''thuh werld endin' all suddenlike, an' all....
It's not my job to educate you; it's to come here and humiliate you.
So blame your lack of education for life punking you repeatedly.

Just where in the atmosphere is this mysterious layer where all the CO2 concentrates?

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>
Just where in the atmosphere is this mysterious layer where all the CO2 concentrates?

that's his point. watch it IMAdigitrap is ruthless, intelligent, kind of incoherent at times and umm wrong.

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>
Just where in the atmosphere is this mysterious layer where all the CO2 concentrates?

For years you've been shilling this magic lens and don't know where it IS? What?

Go to your favorite Global warming site and SEE.

How can you come in Northie and tell us you have pertinent information about the END of the WORLD,

and not even know where the lens is you're trying to tell us has brought about the end to civilization?

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>
Just where in the atmosphere is this mysterious layer where all the CO2 concentrates?

Yes, I would like to know where this layer is as well. Stratosphere? Troposphere? Mesosphere?

I wouldn't think it would further out than the mesosphere, thermosphere or exosphere?

So, genius, where exactly is this "magic lens"?

I Am DigitaP wrote:

<quoted text>
For years you've been shilling this magic lens and don't know where it IS? What?
Go to your favorite Global warming site and SEE.
How can you come in Northie and tell us you have pertinent information about the END of the WORLD,
and not even know where the lens is you're trying to tell us has brought about the end to civilization?

Ah, I see...your CO2 lense is firmly located in the ignoramusphere. Just where I suspected.

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah, I see...your CO2 lense is firmly located in the ignoramusphere. Just where I suspected.

That's E.X.A.C.T.L.Y. WHERE IT'S LOCATED.
E.X.A.C.T.L.Y.

It's IN the SPHERE of the CLIMATOLOGISTS.

The I.G.N.O.R.A.M.U.S.-S.P.H.E.R.E .

And their D.I.R.T. S.T.U.P.I.D. paint-huffer intellect panic-bots.

Mr. Ban appeals to a higher authority:

http://www.christianpost.com/article/20091104...

Science and religion just don't mix, unless the science under discussion is, as I suspect, faith based.

Earthling wrote:

Science and religion just don't mix, unless the science under discussion is, as I suspect, faith based.

Look around, Earthling. Have you somehow missed the fact that half of the denial of climate destruction has come from religious conservatives? Not only from Christian conservatives but also from Muslim conservatives, Hindu conservatives and so on. These are some of the same people who deny evolution and medical research, who believe abortion of a dozen cells constitutes infanticide, who sometimes torture homosexuals to death and who fly airliners into office buildings for the greater glory of God. Ban Ki Moon is merely doing the sensible thing, getting responsible religious leaders to divorce themselves from these lunatics, so we can prevent destruction of the climate rather than welcoming it as nihilistic prophesy.

Religious people have irrational beliefs, liberals have irrational beliefs and the difference is the religious know it’s based on faith, not science.

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>
Look around, Earthling. Have you somehow missed the fact that half of the denial of climate destruction has come from religious conservatives? Not only from Christian conservatives but also from Muslim conservatives, Hindu conservatives and so on. These are some of the same people who deny evolution and medical research, who believe abortion of a dozen cells constitutes infanticide, who sometimes torture homosexuals to death and who fly airliners into office buildings for the greater glory of God. Ban Ki Moon is merely doing the sensible thing, getting responsible religious leaders to divorce themselves from these lunatics, so we can prevent destruction of the climate rather than welcoming it as nihilistic prophesy.

What a dope.

First you proclaim that anyone that does not adhere to your AGW religion is a denier.

Next you proclaim that 1/2 of the "deniers" are conservatives.

And then you throw in the laundry list of all the mindless lefty issues that you lefties hold so dear.

You are a valuable poster. Please post more often. It allows the curious web searchers to see what the lefty loons are all about.

Oh, p.s. please provide the link to the peer reviewed studies that support all your research resulting in the 1/2 blah, blah, blah claims.
Oh, what is that you say? You just make it all up as you go. Yeah, we already knew that.

I Am DigitaP wrote:

And their D.I.R.T. S.T.U.P.I.D..........

..........dirtling, for short.
dirtling, earthling has no brain, eart hling (alien has no affinity to Earth),'injun killer'(has no love for humans), for long

JRS wrote:

<quoted text>
What a dope.
First you proclaim that anyone that does not adhere to your AGW religion is a denier.
Next you proclaim that 1/2 of the "deniers" are conservatives.
And then you throw in the laundry list of all the mindless lefty issues that you lefties hold so dear.
You are a valuable poster. Please post more often. It allows the curious web searchers to see what the lefty loons are all about.
Oh, p.s. please provide the link to the peer reviewed studies that support all your research resulting in the 1/2 blah, blah, blah claims.
Oh, what is that you say? You just make it all up as you go. Yeah, we already knew that.

Speak of the devil. Here's one of our resident right-wing, religious science-deniers now. We can safely assume that the head of the UN is not thinking of you when he promises to reach responsible religious folk.

As for the religious and conservative roots of science denial, one needn't look to mullahs and ayatollahs in the Middle East's oil fields. Just look at the strident denial of current science to be found right here in the more conservative corners of the USA:

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla.: "The vast majority of scientists do not believe that anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are a major contributor to climate change."

Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.: This bill means "people must turn off air-conditioning in the summer."

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga.: "This bill will attack citizens at the pump" and "increase job losses."

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.: This bill will "leave us less competitive in the world marketplace."

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D.: This bill "could bankrupt U.S. air carriers."

Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo.: "Nobody in their right mind" believes we can get half our power from wind and solar or drive a "fleet of golf carts."

Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo.: "It's unclear as to what the long-range trend is as far as the temperature of the Earth is concerned."