Local News: Cumberland, WI 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

Northeast U.S. May Experience Coldest Winter in a Decade, Forecaster Says

Posted in the Weather Forum

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 29 of29
|
next page >
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Fun Facts

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Sep 30, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
Good to know that you are referencing an authoritative source.. Now, next year is going to be hot because the end is nigh right? Ends in fire?
Well for January thru March 2010, it looks cool and cold. I haven't purchased this year's edition so haven't read the summer 2010 prediction yet. I'll let you know when I get it.

http://www.farmersalmanac.com/weather/a/frigi...
Fun Facts

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Sep 30, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
The sun is in the southern hemisphere now. Could that have something to do with it?
I think it has a lot to do with it.
Normando

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Oct 12, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

I went to a seminar on local global warming (southern N.Y.) and the dude giving the spiel gave a nice pitch on the slight rise in average(0.2 o F)temperatures over the last 40 years in the Hudson valley. This of course was based on his own data .He had worked for the National weather service .When I questioned him about instrument calibration etc. over that time frame , he had no answer as to when, how often and what standards were ever used. I call it global BS .
letschanceit

Cheyenne, WY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Oct 12, 2009
 

Judged:

1

frank miller wrote:
Micromanaging the weather is like "opening a box of chocolates, you never know what you gonna get",
a soft centre or a hard nut,'Fun Facts'#14/#15!!
F.M./C.S
first off I don't use judging icons. don't you have to be a registered user to do that? second why are you using the farmers' almanac? it predicts weather year to year. we want to predict the climate with scientific models that can be substantiated. not a "secret recipe" for next harvest moons' rainfall. also, where did you get eh temperature readings from the output from the nuclear reactor cooling discharge?
Chris

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Oct 12, 2009
 
What is with this Frank Miller? I mean, is he schizophrenic or what???
JRS

Milwaukee, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Oct 12, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

letschanceit wrote:
<quoted text>
first off I don't use judging icons. don't you have to be a registered user to do that? second why are you using the farmers' almanac? it predicts weather year to year. we want to predict the climate with scientific models that can be substantiated. not a "secret recipe" for next harvest moons' rainfall. also, where did you get eh temperature readings from the output from the nuclear reactor cooling discharge?
"scientific models that can be substantiated."
----------

ROFLMHO! "scientific models that can be substantiated."

You on drugs or what?

==

“The public is not well served by this constant drumbeat of false alarms fed by computer models manipulated by advocates.”

UN IPCC expert reviewer,
Dr. David Wojick
who earned his PhD in Philosophy of Science
and co-founded the Department of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie-Mellon University

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...

==

former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee
Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland

"Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.”

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...

==

BILL GRAY, professor emeritus. He is often called the World's Most Famous Hurricane Expert.

Gray's crusade against global warming "hysteria" began in the early 1990s, when he saw enormous sums of federal research money going toward computer modeling rather than his kind of science, the old-fashioned stuff based on direct observation. Gray often cites the ascendancy of Gore to the vice presidency as the start of his own problems with federal funding. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stopped giving him research grants. So did NASA. All the money was going to computer models. The field was going off on this wild tangent.

Numerical models can't predict the future, he says. They don't even pretend to predict the weather in the coming season -- "but they make predictions of 50 or 100 years from now and ask you to believe the Earth will get warmer."

The modelers are equation pushers.

"They haven't been down in the trenches, making forecasts and understanding stuff!"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
Raptor in Michigan
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Oct 12, 2009
 

Judged:

1

Normando wrote:
I went to a seminar on local global warming (southern N.Y.) and the dude giving the spiel gave a nice pitch on the slight rise in average(0.2 o F)temperatures over the last 40 years in the Hudson valley. This of course was based on his own data .He had worked for the National weather service .When I questioned him about instrument calibration etc. over that time frame , he had no answer as to when, how often and what standards were ever used. I call it global BS .
Would you expect anything less?
letschanceit

Cheyenne, WY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Nov 6, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

JRS wrote:
<quoted text>
"scientific models that can be substantiated."
----------
ROFLMHO! "scientific models that can be substantiated."
You on drugs or what?
==
“The public is not well served by this constant drumbeat of false alarms fed by computer models manipulated by advocates.”
UN IPCC expert reviewer,
Dr. David Wojick
who earned his PhD in Philosophy of Science
and co-founded the Department of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie-Mellon University
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...
==
former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee
Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland
"Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.”
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...
==
BILL GRAY, professor emeritus. He is often called the World's Most Famous Hurricane Expert.
Gray's crusade against global warming "hysteria" began in the early 1990s, when he saw enormous sums of federal research money going toward computer modeling rather than his kind of science, the old-fashioned stuff based on direct observation. Gray often cites the ascendancy of Gore to the vice presidency as the start of his own problems with federal funding. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stopped giving him research grants. So did NASA. All the money was going to computer models. The field was going off on this wild tangent.
Numerical models can't predict the future, he says. They don't even pretend to predict the weather in the coming season -- "but they make predictions of 50 or 100 years from now and ask you to believe the Earth will get warmer."
The modelers are equation pushers.
"They haven't been down in the trenches, making forecasts and understanding stuff!"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
good post. you realize your "expert" IPCC reviewer is a consultant to industry and corporate-funded groups such as the Heartland Institute, Cato Institute and Citizens for a Sound Economy? not that it takes away from his credentials. just his motives. also, your meteorologist is a weatherman not a climatologist and ANY model is best useful for explaining changes after the fact. maybe NOAA stopped giving wojick research money because he was getting paid by industry and corporate-funded groups and trade associations.
most available empirical data was used for the "models". and, IMO virtual models are the more intelligent choice in this case mainly because it's a relatively new science and full scale models are in short supply. anyway good post, thanks for the links. although the EPW stuff is almost insufferable in it's own political tangents and near incoherent links.
letschanceit

Cheyenne, WY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Sunday Nov 8
 

Judged:

1

1

JRS wrote:
<quoted text>
"scientific models that can be substantiated."
----------
ROFLMHO! "scientific models that can be substantiated."
You on drugs or what?
==
“The public is not well served by this constant drumbeat of false alarms fed by computer models manipulated by advocates.”
UN IPCC expert reviewer,
Dr. David Wojick
who earned his PhD in Philosophy of Science
and co-founded the Department of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie-Mellon University
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...
==
former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee
Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland
"Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.”
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...
==
BILL GRAY, professor emeritus. He is often called the World's Most Famous Hurricane Expert.
Gray's crusade against global warming "hysteria" began in the early 1990s, when he saw enormous sums of federal research money going toward computer modeling rather than his kind of science, the old-fashioned stuff based on direct observation. Gray often cites the ascendancy of Gore to the vice presidency as the start of his own problems with federal funding. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stopped giving him research grants. So did NASA. All the money was going to computer models. The field was going off on this wild tangent.
Numerical models can't predict the future, he says. They don't even pretend to predict the weather in the coming season -- "but they make predictions of 50 or 100 years from now and ask you to believe the Earth will get warmer."
The modelers are equation pushers.
"They haven't been down in the trenches, making forecasts and understanding stuff!"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
my point about scientific models was that they can be studied, revised, improved etc. by anyone. compared to the "secret recipe" used by the farmers almanac to predict rainfall the coming year. also, weather prediction and climate prediction are not the same. and, you are supposing that the reason NOAA and NASA went with computer models rather than "his kind of science, the old-fashioned stuff based on direct observation" was because they could fabricate the results? What if they went with the "wild tangent" of computer modeling because of cost and time of real world observations. the real world, old fashioned stuff is still being implemented and improved as well.
Would you like us to alert you when someone adds a comment?
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 21 - 29 of29
|
next page >
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Daily Horoscope for December 8

Scorpio

You've got your sights set on the future and you're keen to do some planning in preparation for it. You'll find it easy to think laterally and logically, and to take everything into consideration. You'll also do well if you're taking a test or exam because you'll keep your head even if you're nervous, and your memory will help you to remember all those essential facts and figures.

Get your Horoscope »