|
“Team YOU'RE D.E.N.I.E.D.”
Joined: Oct 6, 2009
Comments: 947
Show Low, AZ
|
Michael Allred wrote: <quoted text> It always amazes me when those on the right go on to prove my statement. It shouldn't, because they always do so, but it still just drops the jaw to see how fast the right wingers rush to prove me correct. The only science lab you ever warmed a seat in was testing what color spray paint made you & your friends highest.
|
|
“You are not your bank account.”
Joined: Feb 6, 2008
Comments: 1256
Norman, Oklahoma
ISP:
Norman, OK
|
I Am DigitaP wrote: <quoted text> The only science lab you ever warmed a seat in was testing what color spray paint made you & your friends highest. No, no, that was John's thing. I never could get past how nasty spray paint smelled. Anyway, it still doesn't really excuse the fact that you're a masochistic idiot.
|
|
“Team YOU'RE D.E.N.I.E.D.”
Joined: Oct 6, 2009
Comments: 947
Show Low, AZ
|
Judged:
1
1
Michael Allred wrote: <quoted text> No, no, that was John's thing. I never could get past how nasty spray paint smelled. Anyway, it still doesn't really excuse the fact that you're a masochistic idiot. It's sadism when I fly over frightening trembling moonbats. Masochis is working yourself into indigestion over the IMPENDING E.nd of the W.orld Homer. The world's not ending, there's no magic lens, your church is protected as it should be: a system of beliefs under U.N. law. You're safe; or you would be over there. Here in the States you're just a moonbat.
|
|
“Team YOU'RE D.E.N.I.E.D.”
Joined: Oct 6, 2009
Comments: 947
Show Low, AZ
|
LoL U.N. i should have said U.K.
|
|
“Team YOU'RE D.E.N.I.E.D.”
Joined: Oct 6, 2009
Comments: 947
Show Low, AZ
|
|
|
“EnvironMENTAList ”
Joined: Feb 2, 2007
Comments: 7420
Near Detroit
ISP:
Saint Thomas, Canada
|
Michael Allred wrote: <quoted text> It always amazes me when those on the right go on to prove my statement. It shouldn't, because they always do so, but it still just drops the jaw to see how fast the right wingers rush to prove me correct. Proving once again that global warming is politics, not science. Thanks for that. Thanks for showing your hate for humanity and your wish for misery like some rubber necker at a car accident. You modern day witch burners will be cursed in history for this mess you have created. Preserve, protect and respect Nature, not save it with needless fear from a non existent enemy of "climate Change".
|
|
NobodyYouKnow
Toronto, Canada
|
Florida wrote: <quoted text>1980's PC hardware that ran "DOS" version 1.0 thru version 3.0 had the truncated time/date routines in the "BIOS," because they were limited in memory to 640K. Repeating fecal matter doesn't change it from being bull cr@p.
|
|
Florida
Tampa, FL
|
NobodyYouKnow wrote: <quoted text> Repeating fecal matter doesn't change it from being bull cr@p. You should know... Moose Head Thanks for the tell all link The Poison of Liberalism
|
|
|
ObamaRules
Seattle, WA
|
Maher is 100% correct! You Republican fools need to wake up before it is too late.
|
Joined: Thu Nov 12
Comments: 5
Oxford, OH
|
In Bill Maher’s defence, I do believe that it would be silly for anyone to claim that there hasn’t been some climate change on earth in the past century. But, this is natural. The earth goes through natural phenomenons that occur in global warming and cooling. It is proven that even with the end of harmful emissions global warming will continue on well after 2100. It has been said that the Earth has warm periods called “interglacials” that happen for 12,000 years in-between ice ages. This fact, and the time frames make sense when looking at our global warming, and the last ice age. It is scary to think that humans could potentially be trying to cool are planet when in reality an ice age could be coming. Another issue that makes me questions people motives are how people are replacing global warming with religion. Global warming is becoming something that people are so passionate about and they make it their every day goal to help the environment and reduce the use of fossil fuels. What about all the other extremely important issues that are happening globally such as AIDS, war, economic hardships, etc. The extreme media on global warming has distracted people from what is really going on, and things that need immediate attention.
|
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
Comments: 1903
Connecticut
ISP:
Vernon Rockville, CT
|
mememine69 wrote: <quoted text> If you are saying that all bad weather now is caused by my SUV I can respect that. At least I understand where you are coming from, climate coward. Climate pu$$ie! Stop scaring my kids, freak. You think you are so important that you can make the planet Earth mortal? You think six BILLION people have no effect on the planetary ecosystem?(Which by the way has increased 400% in the last one hundred years)
|
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
Comments: 1903
Connecticut
ISP:
Vernon Rockville, CT
|
Florida wrote: <quoted text>CTEd... I am convinced this explanation is beyond you and the Moose Heads scope to comprehend, however anything that confuses a liberal, they will either deny, lie or have some delusional attack because they are always confused. If you can count in "Base 8 hexidecimal" you shoud have No problem... Lets begin... 1.)MS DOS 1.0 thru MS DOS 3.0 is limited to 640K <-- interrupt 1AH BCD (binary coded decimal) in the register stack that details the implementation causing the limitation in memory that affects the date going back to 1901... 2.)Each byte (BTW: there are 8 bits to a byte and I will stop there) can have a value ranging from 0 to 9. The numbers returned are absolute values, not offsets from 1980. Thus, the maximum value for the (decade) year is 99. 3.)The Fix... DOS 3.1 (Released 1987 about the time Apple lost their lawsuit, because Bill gates stole the Windows operating system from Apple) extend the memory beyond 640K to 1 Mega Byte. The century will then return 19 or 20, and the maximum year (century-year) is now 2099. Thanks to your Moose Head buddy he provided the Tell all link... MS-DOS System Date Cannot Have a Year Past 2099... if you have DOS 3.1 or later!!!! Meaning there will now be a Y2K bug again in year 2099... http://support.microsoft.com/kb/58495 Clinton/Gore were the masterminds of Fearmogering tactics, taking advantage of a 1980 thru 1987 IBM PC "MS DOS BUG" and using the bug as a Doomsday promotion for end to the world... Skeptically, again Global warming is the accelerated warming of the atmosphere due to human activities, the Gore Skeptics rant... To sell over-priced solutions, create imaginary green jobs, and lies to stimulate the economy and put more money in Gore's and General Electrics pockets... One crazy imaginary "Y2K AL GORE" phantom in a lifetime is bad enough, but two imaginary Gore phantoms in a lifetime, "Global warming," is two too much... The inebriated Foolish Ignorance and Poison of Scare Tactics Liberalism This post is meaningless. Who cares about your explanation - the point is simple. Al Gore never touted Y2K as an issue, and Clinton/Gore ignored it until 1998. If you weren't so lazy you could go look it up yourself, it's not that hard. Simply repeating that nonsense doesn't make it true, although you try to hide it in a long post that sounds intelligent, you have said nothing other than "Gore hyped Y2K" which is false. I know you have at least enough brain cells to google it for yoruself.
|
|
“The Future Is Ours”
Joined: Feb 8, 2008
Comments: 2882
If We Fight For It
ISP:
North Aurora, IL
|
CTEd wrote: <quoted text> You think six BILLION people have no effect on the planetary ecosystem?(Which by the way has increased 400% in the last one hundred years) How are you going to regulate volcanism? One major eruption, let alone multiple ones, releases more CO2 than anything man has caused since we crawled out of the sea, and they have for 4.5 billion years.
|
|
“Climate Realist”
Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Comments: 12223
Heilsbronn, Germany
|
Judged:
1
More people means more doctors, scientists, teachers... I like population growth. When I was a kid they said there would be nine billion people by now (another failed forecast), two billion people are unaccounted for. Maybe aliens got them.
|
|
ObamaRules
Seattle, WA
|
Do you conservative fools really want to see what the human effect has been on our Earth's climate?? Just three simple words... "Ice Core Samples"!!!
|
|
“Climate Realist”
Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Comments: 12223
Gunzenhausen, Germany
|
Judged:
1
Ice core samples are the ice thermometers warmists use to prove unprecedented warming. They can't find previous warm period, does it ever occur to them that ice melts when it's warm?
|
|
“The Future Is Ours”
Joined: Feb 8, 2008
Comments: 2882
If We Fight For It
ISP:
Tamaroa, IL
|
ObamaRules wrote: Do you conservative fools really want to see what the human effect has been on our Earth's climate?? Just three simple words... "Ice Core Samples"!!! Are you suggesting the only warming trend indicated in these samples happened in the last 100 years? If not, who caused the others?
|
|
Northie
Spokane, WA
|
mdbuilder wrote: <quoted text> Are you suggesting the only warming trend indicated in these samples happened in the last 100 years? If not, who caused the others? Get a clue: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/milankovitch.h... http://www.physorg.com/news146755017.html
|
|
The Fungus Among Us
West Roxbury, MA
|
Bill Maher is a congenital dimwit who could't find his own ass-cheeks with a full-length mirror and a[solar] flashlight. Mr. Maher - this weekend I will be burning copious piles of leaves in my backyard, taking long hot showers, eating top-of-the-foodchain slabs of beef, racing my car engine at all traffic stops , and allowing my gas leaf-blowers to race at full-throttle all day long.. just so that I can piss on your Moonbat, hysterical Freak-Show, fraudulent hoax, and engineered public shakedown known as "Global Warming" . Blow me, Mr. Maher. THAT is global warming we can use.
|
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
Comments: 1903
Connecticut
ISP:
Vernon Rockville, CT
|
mdbuilder wrote: <quoted text> How are you going to regulate volcanism? One major eruption, let alone multiple ones, releases more CO2 than anything man has caused since we crawled out of the sea, and they have for 4.5 billion years. Wow. How can you be so wrong and not know it? The USGS puts the output of ALL vocanoes WORLD WIDE at 200 million tonnes a year. According to the DOE, tthe global fossile fuel emmissions are 26 BILLION tonnes. http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/2007/07_0... Some of that is made up in a mount sain't helen's type eruption - but not more than humans have ever produced. I've never seen a source for that claim. According to the USGS volcanoes account for only 3 percent of the total (if you combine human and volcanic sources)- humans the other 97%. Considering the amount accrued DAILY - I doubt one eruption even makes up the yearly difference - Kiluaea has been constantly erupting for years - producing far more lava than mount saint helen's ever did and it's still less than 3%. As an aside - the earth was in balance with volcanic eruptions and lots of plant life to soak it up for billions of years. Now that we are burning fossile fuels we are throwing that out of balance - the only want to sponge it up would be to allow the plant life to increase - but are simultaneously DECREASING the plant life at the same time.
|
|
|