Bill Maher: Climate Change Deniers Are "So Stupid They Make ME Question Evolution"

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>
Intellectual elites have lead Europe's fascist movement, eugenics, the ban on DDT that's killed millions of Africans and "peace" movements that have stymied efforts to stop the genocide in Somalia. Intellectuals believe they know better than the rest of us, they cozy up to dictators and criminals while rejecting the values that make America great. Their political correctness and foolishness have caused more harm than religion ever could.
Common sense tells us to value liberty and life, intellectualism tells you all values are relative. You decide.

Um.. it is a religion. A pagan one of Mannian Math Made, Magic Myth-0-Melt-0-Matic Moonbat Milking Moron Magnetic Membranes;

Masslessly,
Measurelessly
M.a.g.i.c.a.l.l.y!
Moving Molecules
of
Mayhem.

See ya at Church !

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/64...

Speaking of churches, the field of whatever it's called now, that originated as 'personality profiling' shows with .. quite a bit of precision, how well you can tell who you're DEALING with:

by whom that person's inSPIRed by.

Look at Arrhenius: a Genocide Doctor no less: selling ETHNIC CLEANSING as his SCIENCE.

Along comes Hansen: "When are we gonna start LOCKING UP all these 'd.e.n.i.e.r.s.' for CRIMES against HUMANITY?"

The guy who cant tell the temperature when paid.

The Global Cooling Scare guy.
The Global Warming Scare guy.

Svante Arrhenius: Serial Scientific Fraud, Fraud DOCTOR, Genocidal SPECIALIST in the SCIENCE of ETHNIC CLEANSING:

"About 1900, Arrehenius became involved in setting up the Nobel Institutes and the Nobel Prizes. He was elected a member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in 1901. For the rest of his life, he would be a member of the Nobel Committee on Physics and a de facto member of the Nobel Committee on Chemistry. He used his positions to arrange prizes for his friends (Jacobus van't Hoff, Wilhelm Ostwald, Theodore Richards) and to attempt to deny them to his enemies (Paul Ehrlich, Walther Nernst)."

"Racial biology

Svante Arrhenius was also actively engaged in the process leading to the creation in 1922 of The State Institute for Racial Biology in Uppsala, Sweden, which had originally been planned as a Nobel Institute. Arrhenius was a member of the institute's board, as he had been in The Swedish Society for Racial Hygiene (Eugenics), founded in 1909. Swedish racial biology was world-leading at this time, and the results formed the scientific basis for the Compulsory sterilization program in Sweden, as well as inspiring the Nazi eugenics in Germany."

This is the lineage of "Climatuhlogical Borehole Lookin Prognostiacatrs of Doom."

mememine69 wrote:

<quoted text>
Climate Change predicts global warming will cause global climate chaos and climate crisis in the form of extreme weather occurances such as drought, flooding, heat waves, hurricanes, tornadoes etc.
This climate crisis from global warming has been promised since 1986. Therefore this resulting cooling and lack of climate crisis we have experienced since then, trumps predicted warming leaving the CO2 theory disproved.

You're right, you're right, I mean, there CERTAINLY hasn't been any radical climate catastrophes in the last couple of decades...

RUSH IS RIGHT wrote:

<quoted text>
And I would say that you have revealed YOURSELF to be a another pathetic, gullible young fool.

You guys just JUMP to prove me right...

in 1988 a Giant Globe Gobbling Genocidal Gas Grill in the sky was ... stimulating but sounded pretty thin, so we let him prognustifucate and preach.

Well: twenty years after the best instrumentation at NASA started looking: not even the PROPHET of this Gas Gremlin of Gasping Genocide

dares show forth a single iota of evidence claiming he used a measuring device

and can point you to where you can use one too, and detect that lens.

O Rly. No, He's a genocide-doctor inspired, wannabe-great
MoonBat.

They all do the same, it DEFINES MoonBat: be WRONG over and over, and over then scream, YOU'RE insane.

Moonbat Mania: D.E.N.I.E.D.

Flying planes ALL THROUGH IT.

For THIRTY YEARS, P.L.U.S.

8km to 12, 20-25 THOUSAND FEET where.. who KNOWS how many hourly checks visually by pilots, knowledgeable about their environment;

military pilots,
commercial pilots

all these people trained to not live but have in case of commercial pilots THOUSANDS, HUNDREDS of thousands of people's lives in their hands through a career

those electronic thermal sensors are good enough for that,

But they can't detect air masses responsible for FALLING that 20,000 FEET to SEA level at EACH POLE and RIDDLE it
from above.
But no00000body saw it. Even people taking money to look for it.

Ooops. "Theyum sinsurz is ALLL Broke!" quoth team Borehole.

Space Shuttle shots through the Lens both ways? Nah. We sent that up broke too.
LoL.
RadioSondes? they float along in magic winds right?
Nope. Them Radiosonde's, is BROKE!.

Infrared camera? Guys flying for the military, got their night vision on, are they noticing a light haze leading off in front, above, to the sides, as they're flying along?
Nah.
Those infra-red sensors on those cameras is BROKE! Really..

Moisture uptake, rain, big thunderheads edging out the averages in the RECORD SETTING HEAT BEING TRAPPED up THERE?
Nope.
Them airs, is BROKE.

Water is, too. You see - TheM AIRS and THEM WATERS, they ain't no climatologists,

them astronauts and navy jet pilots, air force pilots, commercial airline pilots they ain't no climatologist so jist shut uuuup!!"

And meanwhile since the TRUTH's too EXPLOSIVE for NASA,

a few of the architects of this Magical Lens Church of the End is gonna "get you the REAL truth

from their website.

"You don't know how to measure the M.a.g.i.c. H.e.a.t.e.r.

You're just an astronaut.

No? LoL. I R a BOREHOLE specialist!

"I ANALYZE STUFF you don't know exists!"

Nah, we uh.. we designed a gas tester for ice samples. For our robots on mars.

The sheer lunacy; that the entire atmosphere is just building up, BUILDING up, more heat.. more..

FOR THIRTY YEARS.

Yet no telescopic organization on earth has any records that say "due to increasing heated regions in the atmosphere, ESPECIALLY where the M.a.g.i.c. L.e.n.s. of M.a.y.h.e.m. is active, such as the tropics,

maintenance teams for the world's finest optical telescopes have said their instruments are reaching to ever higher levels needed, to offset thermal distortion."

"Telescopes without these image refinements notice them, too. Here is a series of photographs of (X section of the sky) in 1339, 49, 57, 58, 79, 98, and, 2009 [cue photos with distortions highlighted,]"

Nope. Not EVER. Not once?

Nope. It's MAGIC heat, I tell ya, MAGIC heat yer insTRUMEYunts IS useless!!! Yer all gonna die!!!!

Ignorant Moonbat Circular Playground Link Chasing Ad Scam:

D.E.N.I.E.D.

LoL actually they might not have gas sensors on their robots on mars, i was just making the point.

They've been shown wrong, time, and time, and TIME again; but "i'm too smart" for "you to question me."

Wrong.
Mannian Statistics named for "designed to return fraud"

D.E.N.I.E.D.

Hansen paid to establish National Records, misrecords Nations' hottest year by a tiny amount.

Upon being caught by an AMATEUR: instead of making hoopla about 'oh, lol, so sorry, that's why we need guys like you folks who keep us honest," and all that normal, publicity disaster made lemonade with good humor and a tour of NASA Climate'

a sullen "So? it don't matter anyway."

From the same guy who told me a magic lens in the sky melted two ice caps, warmed oceans, and disrupted three separate OTHER ccontinents, for TWENTY YEARS

but can't find it.

Ignorant Hooterville Models that are easily checked up on,

D.E.N.I.E.D.

Ignorant Zombies devoid of all training, claiming because they're stupid, thus afraid, you deserve to be too:

D.E.N.I.E.D.

Michael Allred wrote:

<quoted text>
You guys just JUMP to prove me right...

I agree...

Al Gore buys his carbon off-sets credits from himself--the Generation Investment Management LLP, "an independent, private, owner-managed partnership established in 2004 with offices in London and Washington, D.C." of which he is both chairman and founding partner. Such a Capitalist?

Y2K also known as the "DOS" millennium bug was an exaggerated computer problem related to year 2000. A threat that was greatly exaggerated by Clinton/Gore to sell over-priced solutions and stimulate the economy...

Skeptically, Global warming is the accelerated warming of the atmosphere due to human activities, the Gore Skeptics rant... To sell over-priced solutions, create imaginary green jobs, and lies to stimulate the economy and put more money in Gore's pockets...

One crazy imaginary "Y2K" phantom in a lifetime is bad enough, but two imaginary Gore phantoms in a lifetime, "Global warming," is two too much...

The inebriated Foolishness and Poison of Scare Tactics Liberalism

Florida wrote:

<quoted text>I agree...
Al Gore buys his carbon off-sets credits from himself--the Generation Investment Management LLP, "an independent, private, owner-managed partnership established in 2004 with offices in London and Washington, D.C." of which he is both chairman and founding partner. Such a Capitalist?
Y2K also known as the "DOS" millennium bug was an exaggerated computer problem related to year 2000. A threat that was greatly exaggerated by Clinton/Gore to sell over-priced solutions and stimulate the economy...
Skeptically, Global warming is the accelerated warming of the atmosphere due to human activities, the Gore Skeptics rant... To sell over-priced solutions, create imaginary green jobs, and lies to stimulate the economy and put more money in Gore's pockets...
One crazy imaginary "Y2K" phantom in a lifetime is bad enough, but two imaginary Gore phantoms in a lifetime, "Global warming," is two too much...
The inebriated Foolishness and Poison of Scare Tactics Liberalism

So you agree with me that you are completely full of smeg.

And then you proceed to spew even more complete smeg.

The only plausible explanation would be that you have Multiple Personality Disorder. That or you all, as a whole, has some sort of chronic memory loss syndrome.

Either you're all clinically insane or you're really, really stoned...

Michael Allred wrote:

<quoted text>
That was a whole lot of misinformation just to say that you don't know anything and that you don't WANT to know anything for fear that any knowledge whatsoever would get in the way of your heartfelt irrational prejudices.
What makes you a hypocrite is that you started off trying to pass yourself off as someone who was legitimately trying to debate a scientific issue. Instead you have revealed yourself as just another pathetic, gullible little git.

Don't be too hard on poor Brian. He suffers from Limbaugh's disease.

Florida wrote:

<quoted text>
Y2K also known as the millennium bug was an imaginary computer problem related to year 2000. A threat that was greatly exaggerated by Clinton/Gore to sell over-priced solutions and stimulate the economy...

Lie. It certainly did stimulate the economy because many companies had to buy new 'Y2K fixed' software because they couldn't find the source code to their existing software to fix it, but it was a real problem. Most programs had only used the last two digits for the year (assuming the '19') and thus would improperly calculate values based on years elapsed once the year 2000 rolled in.

Of course, it was fixed without the panic or 'multi trillion dollar' costs that the 'doom sayers' predicted. i.e the conservative 'head in the sand' morons.

Florida wrote:

<quoted text>
Global warming is the accelerated warming of the atmosphere due to human activities,

Stupid. AGW is the warming of the 'global averaqe surface temperature' from solar, Aerosol and GHG levels. The primary GHG increase is CO2 but also NOx, CFCs, Methane, etc count. Some of the aerosols are 'natural' and some are 'manmade' which applies to GHGs too ( dominated by manmade ones from fossil fuels). The solar influence is mainly the 200 year cycle of sunspot intensity that is currently on the decline after ramping up in the early 1900's.

Florida wrote:

<quoted text>
the Gore Skeptics rant... To sell over-priced solutions, create imaginary green jobs, and lies to stimulate the economy...

Al Gore is irrelevant. The science was discovered by many many climatologists who are solidly behind the theory.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-0...

You will have to deal with the reality, not the theory though.

Florida wrote:

<quoted text>
One crazy imaginary Y2K phantom in a lifetime is bad enough, but two imaginary phantoms in a lifetime, Global warming, is two too much...
The inebriated Foolishness and Poison of Scare Tactics Liberalism

You may need a vacation or maybe a diagnosis.

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
Science says that 3 thousand thousand thousand thousand thousand KGs of man-made infra-red energy absorbing CO2 is adding to the global warming effect. Man is on his way to adding 10 thousand thousand thousand thousand thousand KGs of infra-red energy absorbing CO2 to the atmosphere.
If you contend that such is not the case, write up your peer-reviewed science paper published in a Science Journal. You are wasting time babbling & spinning on topix AGW forums.

So how is cap and trade going to save us all when the largest polluter (China) and an up and coming tremendous polluter (India) are telling you hysterics to shove it up your ass? How will it save us all when Europe can't even reach the goals they've put in place? Please enlighten us, oh jackass.

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>
Not at all. Before the dangers of climate cooking were confirmed, nuclear did not seem worth either its economic or its environmental price. Remember Chernobyl? How about the "Green Run" at Hanford? And that's not to mention economic disasters like the Trojan plant, the WPPS fiasco or the current Hanford cleanup project, all of which occurred in my particular backyard, and with plenty of my tax dollars.
That was then. Now we know that we must replace fossil fuels or we'll leave human history's largest bill to pay. We'll have to live with nukes, and plenty of leading enviros are leading the charge. But nukes will still be costly, and slow to build. As Pickens says, gas and wind are faster. Nuclear and solar ultimately have more potential, but take much longer to develop.
More effective still, we can reduce energy demand by improving building codes and urban planning. That's the proverbial low-hanging fruit.

Plenty of enviros are "leading the charge" for nukes? Ha, ha, ha... isn't that ironic?

And this is a funny statement: "Before the dangers of climate cooking were confirmed..." Kind of akin to saying "before the dangers of tornadoes were confirmed," don't you think?

By the way, what's the ratio of people killed in nuclear accidents to those killed at coal or gas-fired or hydrodynamic power plants? And what do you think will be the reduction in building/licensing/startup time for nuke plants now that the enviros have ceased lawsuits trying to prevent same?

CTEd wrote:

<quoted text>
are you even listenting to yourself. "Having no need of" is not the same as "causing no harm"
I have no need to sit through opera, even though it won't cause me harm.
Point is he didn't say "it is harmful to us" he said "We have no need of it"
You posted links that say "it may not be harmful to us" Nowhere does it say "we have found that humans actually Need arsenic to survive.
Effectively he said "we don't need arsenic" and you said "Bullshit - small quantities of arsenic doesn't kill us"
I am just defending logic - you were not arguing his point and didn't prove him wrong - becuase he never claimed what you "proved".
It wasn't that important, happens all the time on here but still bugs me up a wall when someone "answers" with facts not pertaining to what was said.

Typical liberal bullshit... change the question to meet your "facts" until the original question is forgotten. Sorry, but this is getting ridiculous.

He said ANY AMOUNT OF ARSENIC IS A POLLUTANT! I SAID NOTHING ABOUT "NEEDING" IT OR NOT! I simply pointed out that small amounts are not harmful and are, indeed, part of our biology. There was also supposition in the article referenced that we may, indeed, "need" arsenic. However, that wasn't the f'ing argument!!!

Do you get it now? He was wrong. The link I provided proved him wrong. Your subsequent quibbling over the portion of his sentence referencing "need" is worthless because that wasn't even the f'ing argument.

Good God... will you libs ever, just for once, try to form a logical fucking thought?

CTEd wrote:

<quoted text>
Burning wood and grass and cow manure does not add to CO2 in any quantity - as those things decay into CO2 when they rot naturally. fossile fuels were CO trapped away over the course of millions of years and we are burning them off at a rate millions of times faster than it took to create them.
I care about the planet surviving and having something for our kids you care about money. The cure isn't worse than the disease I know that becuase the cure can't possibly hurt the earth. It may hurt our standard of living but again - since WE MUST move off fossile fule and onto renewables AT SOME POINT -doing it now may hurt us in the short term, but long term it can only help - we have to get there anyway as fossile fules will run out.

CO2 is "trapped away" in the permafrost of the arctic. Of course, it sometimes is freed and could increase the CO2 content of the atmosphere.

CO2 is "trapped away" in the oceans, but can be released to the atmosphere.

CO2 is "trapped away" in fossil fuels (the term "fossil" being somewhat suspect). Except when it reaches the surface and decays due to seismic/tectonic/other activity.

So you're doing it "for the CHILDREN!" My, how nice of you. That seems to be the rallying cry for every hysterical jackass I've seen telling me what's best for me (and the entire world) the last few decades. Of course, they most often screw-up whatever they touch. Why should you be any different?

P.S.– I do like money. If you don't, please send all of yours to me. Thank you.

CTEd wrote:

<quoted text>
They weren't wrong. Neither of the things you post at the begninng are wrong becuase they were predicting the future - still future. They may BECOME wrong but you can't say that we won't encounter those things just because we hit a lull in the warming for a couple years.
I don't know that GW will create worse storms, i'm not a climatologitst but I think we can all agree that Obama was not talking about a week from now or a month from now can't we?
The only time Climate change people have been really wrong was the cooling predictions in the 70s.

I get it now. Since the climate is variable all we have to do is wait long enough and every prediction about AGW ever made will come to pass. So in effect, AGW hysterics can never be wrong!

Wow... how could I be so stupid! Thanks for clearing that up!

By the way, I predict that the atmosphere will be ripped from the planet some time in the future. Please send me money for a scheme similar to cap and trade so that I can sell "atmosphere offsets" to combat this impending disaster. Anybody that disagrees with my assessment will be labeled a "denier" and subsequently dismissed from the conversation. Hey, this is kinda fun...

CTEd wrote:

<quoted text>
Never heard of him, and don't belong to any cult.

Never heard of James Hansen? What kind of AGW hysteric are you? Better watch out or they'll take your ELF card away.

NobodyYouKnow wrote:

<quoted text>
Lie. It certainly did stimulate the economy because many companies had to buy new 'Y2K fixed' software because they couldn't find the source code to their existing software to fix it, but it was a real problem. Most programs had only used the last two digits for the year (assuming the '19') and thus would improperly calculate values based on years elapsed once the year 2000 rolled in.
Of course, it was fixed without the panic or 'multi trillion dollar' costs that the 'doom sayers' predicted. i.e the conservative 'head in the sand' morons.
<quoted text>
Stupid. AGW is the warming of the 'global averaqe surface temperature' from solar, Aerosol and GHG levels. The primary GHG increase is CO2 but also NOx, CFCs, Methane, etc count. Some of the aerosols are 'natural' and some are 'manmade' which applies to GHGs too ( dominated by manmade ones from fossil fuels). The solar influence is mainly the 200 year cycle of sunspot intensity that is currently on the decline after ramping up in the early 1900's.
<quoted text>
Al Gore is irrelevant. The science was discovered by many many climatologists who are solidly behind the theory.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-0...
You will have to deal with the reality, not the theory though.
<quoted text>
You may need a vacation or maybe a diagnosis.

The "Y2K" bug was only related to "DOS" home Computers. "NOT" mini-computers, mainframe computers or even Apple Computers. The world ran and still does on Unix based systems, and were "NOT" affected by this exaggerated Gore doomsday bug...

Old hardware "bios" and "Dos" had the truncated time/date routines because they were limited in memory. Newer hardware had worked around this because they had machines that were faster and had more internal memory. However, software also had similar problems. As it was updated there was no need to write these routines until we got close to the new millennium. Many of the records were stamped with this truncated information and to work with the expanded new four digit year stamp that was necessary, there needed to be a routine that added the missing two digits. For example, 01/01/99 needed to be expanded to 01/01/1999 before it could interface with the year 01/01/2000. If not, the calculated interval would have been 1901 years instead of just one year.

Y2K also known as the millennium bug was a "DOS" home computer problem related to year 2000. A threat that was greatly exaggerated by Clinton/Gore to sell over-priced solutions and stimulate the economy...

The inebriated Foolishness and Poison of Scare Tactics Liberalism

Again..

The "Y2K" bug ocurred only with pre-90's "DOS" micro-computers, named a home PC, by IBM, "NOT" mini-computers, mainframe computers or even Apple Computers. The world ran and still does on Unix based systems, and were "NOT" affected by this exaggerated Gore" DOS" doomsday bug...

1980's PC hardware that ran "DOS" had the truncated time/date routines in the "BIOS," because they were limited in memory to 640K. Newer hardware in the early, early 90's worked around the memory issue, because "PC" machines were faster and had more internal memory, so they could run the first generation of Windows.

As PC's hardware was updated there was no need to write correction routines as we got close to the new millennium. Again only 80's PC's that ran "DOS" were stamped with this truncated information, to work with the expanded new four digit year stamp that was necessary, There needed to be a routine added to "DOD" software, the missing two digits for "DOS" programs.

For example, 01/01/99 needed to be expanded to 01/01/1999 before it could interface with the year 01/01/2000. If not, the calculated interval would have been 1901 years instead of just one year.

Y2K also known as the millennium bug was only a "DOS" 1980's home computer PC issue. AL Gore exploited this issue, for the doomsday year 2000.

A threat that was greatly exaggerated by Clinton/Gore to sell over-priced solutions and stimulate the economy...

Skeptically, Global warming is the accelerated warming of the atmosphere due to human activities, the Gore Skeptics rant... To sell over-priced solutions, create imaginary green jobs, and lies to stimulate the economy and put money in Gore's pockets...

One crazy imaginary Y2K phantom in a lifetime is bad enough, but two imaginary Gore phantoms in a lifetime, Global warming, is two too much...

The inebriated Foolishness and Poison of Scare Tactics Liberalism