Trayvon Martin Shooting Shows Perils of Lax U.S. Gun Laws

Judged:

1

1

1

ZigmunnDroid wrote:

<quoted text>
I would go with the bloody wounds present on the high res pics the media "forgot" to post after they claimed no wounds.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/432...
it's called evidence, despite what you prefer it to be.
You are not to good at this, stick around and learn from the pros.

Judged:

1

1

1

menards wrote:

<quoted text>
HAHA! Look how far these Zimmerheads are grasping these days. Oh I dont know, presumed innocent until proven guilty? Where is your evidence that Trayvon Martin committed any crime that night leading up to the point Zimmerman confronted him with a 9MM pistol? Thats right, you dont have any. Law abiding citizen.

Judged:

1

1

1

Aquarius-WY wrote:

<quoted text>
<rolls eyes>
Key word dummy, "REASONABLY" believes. Besides, yours is a moot point as Martin is dead and there is no such evidence that supports your claim either.

Judged:

1

1

1

menards wrote:

<quoted text>
These pictures have been availible for months.. what do they really show? Non-life-threatening injuries.

menards wrote:

<quoted text>
So if you >YOU< are defending yourself against another citizen, and you know that at that point its either you or them, and you are on top of the other person fighting for your life, the other person pulls out a gun and shoots you through the heart killing you. You are saying all the rest is irrelevent BS, you were the one on top. You were the thung that derserved to die. So you support "last man standing"?

menards wrote:

<quoted text>
EXACTLY!!!! What does a "reasonable" 17 yr old male think an adult who is following them around in the dark is about to do? Take him out for cookies?

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice wrote:

I can't wait for the P.A.(that Zimmerman went to the day after the shooting, to get a note to return to work) to testify. The sooner the better. She described his head as normal and without injury. His mood was normal and he was not overly distressed (in spite of the rumor that he sat and cried for days about it). He did not need stitches. He did not need x-rays. He did not need a brain scan. His nose was 'likely' broken. He had 2 black eyes, as a result of the nose trauma. He had 2 scratches on his head, one a fraction of a cm the other 2 cms in length.
Oh wait. If he was so upset, and cried for days because of this, why was he getting a note to return to work the very next day? Guess he only started crying when he found out that his head was normal and without injury and he realized he was screwed!

Judge Advocate wrote:

<quoted text>Zimmer is a bigot and he was always known to be a nutcase. When I was at USC, I knew of many cases where blacks were pulled over and harassed. Officers would confront these black students, driving their own BMW, Mercedes, Maserati, etc. and once they identified that they owned the vehicles the officers would taunt and harass them saying things like you think you are better than me, you think your silver spoon gives you privilege, you wanna hit me, and crap like that. Zimmer was a bully and a racist and targeted his victim. He had a hard-on and refused to back down, as instructed by the 911 operator.

Where Is My America wrote:

<quoted text>LMAO!

Judge Advocate wrote:

<quoted text>Your analogy is not legal. If you break criminal laws one day, get caught and are convicted then you are a criminal. Running a stop sign is breaking the law, but a conviction does not make one a criminal.
Zimmer may be guilty, but until he is tried and convicted he is not a criminal.

Judged:

1

1

1

menards wrote:

<quoted text>
I dont know, the bullet through the heart perhaps? Keep in mind the fact that Martin IS dead.

menards wrote:

<quoted text>
So if you >YOU< are defending yourself against another citizen, and you know that at that point its either you or them, and you are on top of the other person fighting for your life, the other person pulls out a gun and shoots you through the heart killing you. You are saying all the rest is irrelevent BS, you were the one on top. You were the thung that derserved to die. So you support "last man standing"?

menards wrote:

<quoted text>
HAHA! Look how far these Zimmerheads are grasping these days. Oh I dont know, presumed innocent until proven guilty? Where is your evidence that Trayvon Martin committed any crime that night leading up to the point Zimmerman confronted him with a 9MM pistol? Thats right, you dont have any. Law abiding citizen.

menards wrote:

<quoted text>
So your telling me I can walk around shooting anyone I please because, at some point, EVERYONE has broken some kind of law at some point in there lives, making EVERYONE a criminal (including you)

menards wrote:

<quoted text>
These pictures have been availible for months.. what do they really show? Non-life-threatening injuries.

Judged:

2

2

2

RuffnReddy wrote:

<quoted text> A couple of scratches and a bruise is about all. If I'd punched that fatazz he'd still be in a coma.
I'm still trying to figure out who took the photos at the scene, and why the Sanford PD stood there and watched as "their" crime scene was being whored up by a stranger. Who was George on the phone with when the police arrived? Who called George's wife to come pick up the vehicle?

Judged:

1

1

1

Judge Advocate wrote:

<quoted text>Your analogy is not legal. If you break criminal laws one day, get caught and are convicted then you are a criminal. Running a stop sign is breaking the law, but a conviction does not make one a criminal.
Zimmer may be guilty, but until he is tried and convicted he is not a criminal.

Marauder wrote:

<quoted text>
"If I'd punched that fatazz he'd still be in a coma."
Ha...maybe that's what M thought too....loser.

Boogle Eyed wrote:

<quoted text>
George was not a woman getting raped. Trayvon was a law biding citizen.