AP Interview: One-on-One With Drew Peterson

sammy wrote:

<quoted text>
BECAUSE DP and JB called the MEDIA! When will you understand that? Would you like their contact info to verify this fact??
Think for a second do you think the Naperville police called the media? Do you think the 22 year old called the media? Whom does that leave? I get it you'll try and blame the neighbor...WRONG.
BTW, DP does not have any God children, or nieces or nephews...or for that matter any family that's sticking by him. What happened to brother Paul?? I'd love to know, rumor has it he's in Protective Custody too??????

Judged:

3

2

2

Think-About-It wrote:

<quoted text>
I personally like to ask people that state something to post their source to save me some time. It isn't bashing someone asking for the link - it is just asking for a courtesy. Hopefully Sammy responds to my message to him with his link and doesn't tell me to get off my dead a** and research it myself..

Judged:

2

1

SueH wrote:

<quoted text>
You've seen the things I've posted about and the ones you've had questions on, you haven't been a jerk or hardass, but rather respectful about asking for the information. I suppose it's not in what you say, but rather, how you say it.
Fox- You don't have to agree with me or even like what I say, but sugar will get you further than venom.

Judged:

2

2

2

Think-About-It wrote:

<quoted text>
Usually you have posted the links but the last ones about the pastor and SB posting comments about the kids being left alone you wouldn't even though I asked on more than one occassion. I thought your comment was aimed at me as well since you didn't respond to my requests for links.
I do try to follow the motto that you catch more flies with honey. But sometimes I can get a bit salty.(Spam and nuts are salty you know. LOL - Had to throw that one out there for whoever keeps tagging me as spammy nuts.)

Judged:

1

SueH wrote:

<quoted text>
You've seen the things I've posted about and the ones you've had questions on, you haven't been a jerk or hardass, but rather respectful about asking for the information. I suppose it's not in what you say, but rather, how you say it.
Fox- You don't have to agree with me or even like what I say, but sugar will get you further than venom.

Judged:

2

2

1

SueH wrote:

<quoted text>
You've seen the things I've posted about and the ones you've had questions on, you haven't been a jerk or hardass, but rather respectful about asking for the information. I suppose it's not in what you say, but rather, how you say it.
Fox- You don't have to agree with me or even like what I say, but sugar will get you further than venom.

Judged:

1

SueH wrote:

<quoted text>
I have no problem posting them, but I do take exception when I'm ordered to do so as Foxy as done.

Judged:

1

1

1

SueH wrote:

I never told anyone to get off THEIR anything.
"Why should I do the research for you? If I don't believe something something, I get off my dead ass and research it. Better yet, send a PM to Admin to get it for you."
Twist, spin, repeat.

Judged:

2

2

2

Foxylady wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep, that's what you said, "I get off my dead-a** and research it". Had you NOT been aiming that at me you would have NOT found it necessary to include "dead a**" in you're comment. So if you want to look at who'se twising and spinning here you better have a look within. JMO

Judged:

2

1

1

SueH wrote:

<quoted text>
Twist, spin, repeat. I'll let you know when I'm aiming a post at you. But typically, I do try to ignore trolls. Twist, spin, repeat.

AVALON EWO wrote:

JUST SOME THOUGHTS: Human nature is an interesting subject: I blog on this site "Bolingbrook, and Plainfield" because it is a smaller site and most of us are on the same page regarding Drew being guilty. I could not stand
a site, that lauded Drew or Brodsky in totality. I would go where, there are like minded people that I feel I have something in common with.
The www.legalpublication.blogspot.com is a great site for those who want to get a different angle on the "Drew Peterson Case", and discourse with others who feel Drew is getting a rotton deal and Brodsky is the second coming as a lawyer. I found it interesting, but it has not changed my thinking about Drew being a Murderer, and Brodsky being an inept Lawyer one iota. JMO For the prosecution

Judged:

1

1

1

AVALON EWO wrote:

JUST SOME THOUGHTS: Human nature is an interesting subject: I blog on this site "Bolingbrook, and Plainfield" because it is a smaller site and most of us are on the same page regarding Drew being guilty. I could not stand
a site, that lauded Drew or Brodsky in totality. I would go where, there are like minded people that I feel I have something in common with.
The www.legalpublication.blogspot.com is a great site for those who want to get a different angle on the "Drew Peterson Case", and discourse with others who feel Drew is getting a rotton deal and Brodsky is the second coming as a lawyer. I found it interesting, but it has not changed my thinking about Drew being a Murderer, and Brodsky being an inept Lawyer one iota. JMO For the prosecution

Judged:

2

2

1

Foxylady wrote:

<quoted text>
I read some of that stuff on the legalpub site and what amazed me was that some of those who commented on what Brodsky had to say said they thought DP was guilty but after reading what Brodsky had to say they changed their mind and thought DP was getting a raw deal. I'm with you on Brodsky. He's stating things as if he's known DP forever and to my knowledge that's not the case. He's going strictly by what DP has TOLD him. His own law partner thinks he's going about this case in the wrong way. I think it was SueH. that posted that if DP is charged and goes to trial Brodsky will not be the attorney representing DP. "They'll bring in the big guns!" HA!! WHAT attorney in his/her right mind would take over after Brodsky has allowed DP to blab on any TV network that would have him?

Judged:

2

1

1

-Plainfield Mom - wrote:

<quoted text>
So, that's where you've been lately, Avalon, cheating on us, eh?

-Plainfield Mom - wrote:

<quoted text>
So, that's where you've been lately, Avalon, cheating on us, eh?

AVALON EWO wrote:

<quoted text>REPLY: Hi PM, I just wanted to see what that Site was all about. Actually, it did point out rather well, how the media,One on One shows with DP, can pick an choose what they will or not use on a program. It did answer the question,(Through Brodsky) about how he happened to have a picture of
Tom Morphey in his pocket.
I did feel most of what I read was fair and balanced including some of the comments by the posters. Having said that, It would not be the forum for me. My instincts about Drew and his OFF HANDED comments about Stacy and Kathleen, I have found repugnant and consistent with the personality of a sociopath. I think he is Guilty, and I still think his lawyer is every bit of a buffoon just like Drew. In the end, it will be up to a Jury to decide. My feeling is, HE will be found guility of Murder. JMO
I would rather discourse with like minded people on the subject but certainly realize everyone is entitled to their own opinion and say. It is however, a good site for those who think Drew might be railroaded etc.
It would test my patience, and I just could not go there. But again, I would say it seems like a well done site. It was worth looking over.
Avalon, Again JMO