Homosexuality and the Bible

Chunky Lipstick wrote:

<quoted text>
Well then by your own definition and rationalizing your concern for circumcision is a red herring. This is twice you've refused to refute my assertion of a child needing a female mother for nurturing and companionship as a parent. Any other way is indeed abnormal and unnatural and I'll take your topic shifting ways as a nod in defeat my afflicted brother.
I should've been a dentist.

Judged:

1

1

1

Reverend Alan wrote:

<quoted text>
I too have complained about David from Pekin Ill having knowledge of only 6 verses in the Bible because it means there are 31,000 other verses he totally, completely ignores. If this discussion is about homosexuality and the Bible, those other 31,000 verses need to be included, and once David Moore has posted his 6 verses it is time to move on to the other 31,000 and see what they have to say. Of course David is just a troll and will keep posting the same old 6 verses as if no one has ever seen them before.
Having examined the other 31,000 verses I can assure Topix readers that the Bible is not qualified to tell us about homosexuality, or anything for that matter.

Judged:

1

1

1

Chunky Lipstick wrote:

Anything other than having a female for a mother is unacceptable, abnormal, and unnatural.
Blows the gay thing right outta the water and all else is a rationalizing agenda. Stay outta my tent and stay away from my children. All of you.

Ivorydick wrote:

<quoted text>
Re....unacceptable, abnormal, and unnatural...
Does that apply to me too?
I am a male and became and became a single parent when my kids, including a daughter, were very small.
They are all very successful in their careers and are uncontaminated by any sort of religion

Judged:

3

3

3

Romeo wrote:

He who is without sin and all that....
Stop masking your homophobia with religious hoohaa
The bible is no longer relevant in todays society like it was centuries ago. Times change.
And don't knock bum sex until you try it.

Judged:

3

3

3

Romeo wrote:

<quoted text>
go stick a crucifix up your shitter

Judged:

1

1

1

Scott wrote:

<quoted text>Anyone who actually believes in Christianity won't sit back and allow people to drive over a cliff:
Leviticus 18:22 - You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 - If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their blood guiltiness is upon them.
Romans 1:26-27 - For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.
I Corinthians 6:9 (NIV)- Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
I Timothy 1:8-11 (NASB)- "But we know that the Law is good, if one uses it lawfully, realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching, according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, with which I have been entrusted."

Judged:

1

1

1

Mose wrote:

<quoted text>Your anti-Christian bigotry really belongs in another century.
The Bible repeatedly condemns homosexual behavior. This is supported by centuries of Christian and Jewish scholarship, tradition, and practice.
It has nothing to do with 'homophobia.'

Judged:

2

2

2

Mose wrote:

<quoted text>Your anti-Christian bigotry really belongs in another century.
The Bible repeatedly condemns homosexual behavior. This is supported by centuries of Christian and Jewish scholarship, tradition, and practice.
It has nothing to do with 'homophobia.'

Judged:

2

2

1

Chunky Lipstick wrote:

<quoted text>
Well then by your own definition and rationalizing your concern for circumcision is a red herring. This is twice you've refused to refute my assertion of a child needing a female mother for nurturing and companionship as a parent. Any other way is indeed abnormal and unnatural and I'll take your topic shifting ways as a nod in defeat my afflicted brother.
I should've been a dentist.

Judged:

1

1

1

LuLu Ford wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree. An ideal situation is a mother who is nurturing and offers loving companionship in the formative years. That mother need not be genetically related however. The words abnormal or natural are subjective which was my point.

Judged:

1

1

1

Mose wrote:

<quoted text>Your anti-Christian bigotry really belongs in another century.

Judged:

1

1

1

WasteWater wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks sis.

Judged:

1

1

1

Chunky Lipstick wrote:

Anything other than having a female for a mother is unacceptable, abnormal, and unnatural.
Blows the gay thing right outta the water and all else is a rationalizing agenda. Stay outta my tent and stay away from my children. All of you.

Judged:

1

LuLu Ford wrote:

<quoted text>
I couldn't resist that on bro. Sorry for answering your post. ;0)

Judged:

2

2

2

WasteWater wrote:

<quoted text>
I know a father who is a single parent. His young wife died of breast cancer. Should his three year old daughter be taken from him?

Judged:

3

3

3

Kesla15 wrote:

<quoted text>
I've tried being nice and reasonable. Since you keep attacking me with your tales of fire and brimstone i'm just going to be honest.
I DO NOT CARE what your ancient story about magical sky fairies, slavery and murder says about what I do in the PRESENT DAY. Your book of 2000 years age, does not affect ME in anyway. I am an AGNOSTIC, I DO NOT follow your religion, therefore it does not affect how I should live MY life.
If I were a CHRISTIAN, or went to CHURCH it would be different. But seeing as I do not wish to follow your cult, nor wish to follow your services or even engage in contact with your WASP-superior-ideology, then you and I have no further need for conversation.
I'm not going into your church preaching MY dislike of your religion (even though I have every right to seeing how YOUR KIND have abused MY KIND and OTHERS for CENTURIES). Therefore I would gladly appreciate if YOU could leave me and other LGBT people ALONE.
Rant over.
I'm going to go read a different science fiction book, preferably one that hasn't caused mass war and genocide for the past 2000 years and delayed society's advancement by at least 1000 years.
Good day.