Are Gay Marriage Opponents Irrational?

Posted in the Journalism Forum

Read

946 Comments

Add to my Tracker

More Journalism Discussions »

Comments (Page 48)

Showing posts 941 - 946 of946

< prev page

next page >

Go to last page| Jump to page:

Toby Portland, OR	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #986 Feb 14, 2012 Judged: 1 1 1 The Constitution makes no mention of marriage anyway, so your point is moot.
Lilith_SatansWho re Since: Jul 11 6,490 Location hidden	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #987 Feb 14, 2012 Judged: 2 1 1 Toby wrote: The Constitution makes no mention of marriage anyway, so your point is moot. so in what year did we vote on hetero marriage... refresh my memory on that
Toby Portland, OR	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #988 Feb 15, 2012 Judged: 1 1 1 Traditional marriage is an age old institution, it doesn't need a vote, but for those who would prefer same sex marriages, it will need a vote under the present discrimination it faces.
DNF “Thank you Target!” Since: Apr 07 21,104 Born in Newark, Ohio	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #989 Feb 16, 2012 Judged: 2 2 2 Toby wrote: Traditional marriage is an age old institution, it doesn't need a vote, but for those who would prefer same sex marriages, it will need a vote under the present discrimination it faces. I think that is what most anti gay forces want, but when you consider the changing trends, it's possible their push for "let the people vote" may blow up in their faces. When that happens I'm sure we'll see a big turn around in the whole "activist liberal judges " claim and they will be running to the courts to try to stop it.
Toby Portland, OR	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #990 Feb 17, 2012 Judged: 2 2 2 Just as past discriminations were finally stopped by federal law, discrimination against homosexuals should be stopped. Remember a majority wanted segregation to continue in the South, so taking that as a guideline maybe the vote is a bad idea, like you said, it could blow up in gay marriage proponents faces. Marriage between different races were condemned in America for a majority of its history up until 1967, so it might just take some time to get same sex marriages legitimized.
WasteWater Since: Aug 11 7,340 Location hidden	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #991 Feb 17, 2012 Toby wrote: Just as past discriminations were finally stopped by federal law, discrimination against homosexuals should be stopped. Remember a majority wanted segregation to continue in the South, so taking that as a guideline maybe the vote is a bad idea, like you said, it could blow up in gay marriage proponents faces. Marriage between different races were condemned in America for a majority of its history up until 1967, so it might just take some time to get same sex marriages legitimized. These dudes remind me of the 'Law and Order' freaks of yesterday.
Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required) Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 941 - 946 of946

< prev page

next page >

Go to last page| Jump to page:

Type in your comments below

Name
(appears on your post)

Comments

Characters left: 4000

Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Journalism Discussions

Search the Journalism Forum:

Topic	Updated	Last By	Comments
Transferred Lenoir City teacher did his job	4 hr	hi hi	40
'Jerusalem will be united when it's divided again'	6 hr	EdtheZIT Exposed	12
Israel media worried over looming indictment	7 hr	Jeff Brightone	1
Israel media worried over looming indictment	8 hr	Ayreshire	2
Pam Strickland: Transferred Lenoir City teacher...	9 hr	Who Let The Dawgs Out	11
If Facts Don't Lie, is Mexico Safer than the U.S.? (Mar '11)	11 hr	Concerned	12
Can Tech Innovations Bring Revenue for Hyperloc...	14 hr	yah te hay	2