Staging debunked

Judged:

1

1

Starry wrote:

Btw, I was just on the tru crime site. Their take seems much the same as mine. Their references were strong, although I take most anything alleged with a grain of salt. I do not believe the Ramsey's guilt. The molestation was not committed by a family member, IMO. And Burke was a small boy. He was never even considered a suspect (okay, not that this proves anything). To crush her skull like that does seem to be overkill. And what about the garotte? I have read a lot of true crime. Parents don't do this to their children. Not loving parents. Besides, whomever did it had to have had a knowledge of specific or special knots. The parents were exonerated by lie detector tests administered by professional professionals. Redundant? Lol. Probably. But the facts speak for themselves, right?

Judged:

2

2

1

BrotherMoon wrote:

The polygraph didn't exonerate them.
There was no garrote.
There was no stun gun.
And you have to be a stone cold idiot not to know that parents do even worse to their children than what Patsy did. Sorry for the bluntness.

Judged:

2

2

1

Mama2JML wrote:

<quoted text>
Were the marks on JB supposedly bruises left from buttons? What do we call the cord contraption? And, sadly enough, you are correct BM, parents are capable of doing just about anything to their children.:o(

Judged:

2

1

1

IgetmoneyDoe wrote:

its a mystery, I guess?