Burke Ramsey's new website

If you're interested in "Flying Machines, Sound Waves, or Microprocessors", then Burke's new website is for you. Nothing about this case of course, but what else is new from he or John?

http://dilutionofprecision.com :80/

For the last several days, Burke's website has said "Under Construction." It doesn't take even 24 hours for a computer aficionado like Burke to put up his website. I believe he's deliberately saying this to DUCK reporters questions for the 15th anniversary like he's been dodging the police questions for the past two years.

And you are not at all surprised are you? Me either.

candy wrote:

For the last several days, Burke's website has said "Under Construction." It doesn't take even 24 hours for a computer aficionado like Burke to put up his website. I believe he's deliberately saying this to DUCK reporters questions for the 15th anniversary like he's been dodging the police questions for the past two years.

Yes, I am surprised. He will apparently go to the ends of the earth to avoid having to deal with QUESTIONS, QUESTIONS AND MORE QUESTIONS about the murder of his sister. Just like his father. And I don't consider Oprah any type of credible interviewer, so I guess that leaves Lin Wood pal Katie Couric to softball John Ramsey when his book comes out.

What exactly do you expect Burke to remember after 15 years?

candy wrote:

For the last several days, Burke's website has said "Under Construction."

I wonder if he uses sticks and light nylon cord.

Creepy, the way you guys stalk a young man, who was A CHILD when it all happened.

Simon wrote:

Creepy, the way you guys stalk a young man, who was A CHILD when it all happened.

A 5-year old playmate described the killer in the Samantha Runnion abduction. BR was less than a month shy of his 10th birthday,

Legal__Eagle wrote:

<quoted text>
A 5-year old playmate described the killer in the Samantha Runnion abduction. BR was less than a month shy of his 10th birthday,

...and? I still think it's super-creepy, a bunch of older folks trying to track every move of some young guy.
The fact that his website is showing "Under Construction" (are people seriously checking it every day?)...instead of grandiose ideas that he's trying to avoid some "15th Anniversary" BS, maybe it's because he's just not interested in it at the moment? Personal websites aren't everyone's first priorities. People here are blowing the simplest, most benign activities out of proportion.
If I was in his shoes and found this thread, I would be thoroughly creeped out.

He'd have to have an interest in his sister to find this thread, so I don't think there is anything to worry about

You can rest easy tonight

Skeptical wrote:

What exactly do you expect Burke to remember after 15 years?

He can remember the truth. He can remember his sister the evening she died, their interactions. He can even remember her voice... He can remember the last minutes he spent with her when she was alive....

The 'truth' is the likely reason he will not speak with investigators. He is the creepy one. No interest whatsoever in finding out what happened to his sister. No interest in helping the plight of abused and murdered children and there are so many...

Not murdering... masters of manipulation and deception. It was a cover up of an accident, not deliberate murder.

That was genius to send Patsy's sister into the house disguised as a cop to remove evidence.

Capricorn wrote:

He'd have to have an interest in his sister to find this thread, so I don't think there is anything to worry about
You can rest easy tonight

Or yanno, he bothers to check his site tracker and wonders why on earth so many hits are coming from Topix, or from certain IP addresses each and every day. For all we know, your constant lurking is what made him decide to put his site "under construction".

Boy are you an idiot Simon. Burke has a link to his website RIGHT ON THE FRONT OF HIS TWITTER PAGE. If you don't want people to visit your site, DON'T ADVERTISE IT. He's just a cowardly jerk hiding from the hard questions the POLICE and the press want to ask him about this MURDER case paid for with PUBLIC MONEY that has NO INTRUDER SUSPECTS.

lol. Time to find a new hobby, cupcake. Sorry you get so riled up over a post from a random stranger.

candy wrote:

Boy are you an idiot Simon. Burke has a link to his website RIGHT ON THE FRONT OF HIS TWITTER PAGE. If you don't want people to visit your site, DON'T ADVERTISE IT. He's just a cowardly jerk hiding from the hard questions the POLICE and the press want to ask him about this MURDER case paid for with PUBLIC MONEY that has NO INTRUDER SUSPECTS.

There are people that want justice for the death of this child and it isn't her family. Burke is the key to the truth, no more no less. He is running from police and they aren't even chasing him. Few people care enough to ask the right questions.

The circumstances of what happened to this little girl while she was alive are as bizarre and staged as what happened when she died. Patsy was mentally unbalanced. It is not within the perimeters of normal parental behavior to bleach the hair of a 4, 5, or 6 year old to win a contest. It was a cover up. JonBenet worked as hard as a little girl in Africa picking cotton and was abused by her master.

Why did the Ramseys send Burke off that morning without asking him where his sister might be? If JonBenet was alive and believed kidnapped why wasn’t Burke asked if JonBenet had said anyone was bothering her or if he’d seen any strange cars or people in the neighborhood? The school janitor, the pizza deliveryman, the neighbor’s uncle, the paperboy, the plumber….

The father was to be waiting for a call from a kidnapper and didn’t have the wherewithal to ask Burke where his missing cell phone might be? The father sat in the room why police installed a wiretap to the landline and didn’t even mention he had a cell phone number too. Burke didn’t ask why the police were there and why he had to go to a friend’s house. When asked on the ride over about what happened all he could do was say BEEP BEEP, a very programmed response. The evidence suggests all 3 knew she was dead.

Burke is the one most likely to have accidentally injured JonBenet, to hit her in the head with a golf club as he did the year before. Sibling abuse is far more common than husband wife domestic abuse, it just not reported. What most kids do to their own brothers and sisters would be considered criminal behavior if inflicted on a non-family member.

Mornin' Lynette, or is it Amber today?

Poor thing. Holiday not going well?

You really should be relaxing instead of this. Do yourself a favor. Go to the pool, have a Pina Colada and we'll all be waiting when you get back. In the meantime, have a good time with your make believe family.

It deserves consideration why you chase after an accidental death theory with such venom. It’s very puzzling and curious to us you never aim the malice laced retorts to theories that accuse Patsy of purposely killing JonBenet and John sexually abusing her. It is this response that gives the accident theory added credibility.

It’s far saner to have JonBenet’s death resolved as an accident. I’ve never believed anyone murdered JonBenet, more likely her parents covered up an accident with Burke the most likely person to hit her. Patsy was about show and pretense; that was important to her from her gaudy home decor to pageants. She wouldn’t have been comfortable with an ordinary accident killing JonBenet. She wanted JonBenet to be famous. She was also likely embarrassed about her developmentally delayed daughter. A six year old in diapers with bleached blond hair, a year behind in school and unable to read is quite rare in the spectrum of society, especially one that should have had every advantage and opportunity to excel.

Burke may have only been defending himself in the ‘accident’. JonBenet had serious issues from Patsy’s ritual abuse. Her behavior would have been troublesome and she was likely more of a brat than many perceive through no fault of her own.

You won’t find another case where the prime suspects were allowed to remove anything from the crime scene. As I said it was pure genius and has never been properly addressed. Patsy’s sister was disguised as a cop and allowed into the crime scene to remove evidence. This was a well-orchestrated event. She had to have an oversized jacket plus somebody’s badge. It was a conspiracy between Ramsey attorneys and the lackluster office of Boulder DA Alex Hunter. He did not provide Boulder with the professional decisions he was hired to perform. Boulder was a college town with a huge drug problem and instead of understanding the complex social issue he made plea deals and settled everything out of court. In the end Alex Hunter was so naïve about drugs in the community his son died from an overdose of a prescription with his name on the bottle.

In the end it comes down to the fibers and the dolls Patsy's sister removed from the crime scene. They tie Patsy directly to the macramé noose found on JonBenet. Why did the Ramseys remove dolls? Why didn’t John Ramsey go to police when an identical doll to one they removed arrived by UPS at his office the first week in January 1997? Why didn’t Alex Hunter investigate the fibers?

C O N S P I R A C Y

Lacking the ability and or willingness to see into human behavior people resort to conspiracy theories.