RDIs, any reasonable doubt?

Judged:

3

3

3

Mama2JML wrote:

Is there any doubt in your mind that a Ramsey killed JB? If so, please elaborate...

Judged:

2

1

1

Charlie Chan wrote:

<quoted text>No doubt in my mind. There is no credible evidence of an intruder. To try to sell me the idea that an intruder came into the home, spent a few hours there, wrote a 3 page ransom note, killed JB, then left without leaving a trace of his existence in that home is simply impossible.
CC

Judged:

3

1

1

Mama2JML wrote:

Is there any doubt in your mind that a Ramsey killed JB? If so, please elaborate...

Judged:

1

1

1

Mama2JML wrote:

<quoted text>
What about the boot print? Was it linked to JR or BR? Size would be an indicator....and then there's the DNA in her underwear, on the waistband and under her fingernails. I genuinely want to know how you can resolve these issues. Are there explanations of which I'm unaware?

Judged:

1

1

Ole South wrote:

<quoted text>
In view of the extreme brutality as shown by the condition of JonBenet's body, I don't believe for one minute that her parents had anything whatsoever to do with her murder.
It was the work of a mentally unbalanced sadist who was deeply involved in weird sex and possibly even necrophilia...and more than likely a pedophile. JMO

Judged:

1

1

1

Ole South wrote:

<quoted text>
In view of the extreme brutality as shown by the condition of JonBenet's body, I don't believe for one minute that her parents had anything whatsoever to do with her murder.
It was the work of a mentally unbalanced sadist who was deeply involved in weird sex and possibly even necrophilia...and more than likely a pedophile. JMO

Judged:

1

1

1

Mama2JML wrote:

Is there any doubt in your mind that a Ramsey killed JB? If so, please elaborate...

Judged:

1

Mama2JML wrote:

Is there any doubt in your mind that a Ramsey killed JB? If so, please elaborate...

Judged:

1

1

1

P I N K E R wrote:

<quoted text>I have no doubt the Ramseys were involved in JonBenet's death, not that they murdered her, I think they covered up an accident.

The reason is because of the American Girl Dolls the parents had Patsy's sister remove from the crime scene. The dolls have tan cotton bodies and tan cotton fibers were found on the duct tape. One doll has a skirt of shedding navy wool and it was reported dark blue fibers were found wiped on JonBenet. A duplicate doll was ordered anonymously and shipped to John RamseyÂ’s office the first week of 1997. The DA never followed up when informedÂ…

Judged:

1

1

1

P I N K E R wrote:

<quoted text>I have no doubt the Ramseys were involved in JonBenet's death, not that they murdered her, I think they covered up an accident.

The reason is because of the American Girl Dolls the parents had Patsy's sister remove from the crime scene. The dolls have tan cotton bodies and tan cotton fibers were found on the duct tape. One doll has a skirt of shedding navy wool and it was reported dark blue fibers were found wiped on JonBenet. A duplicate doll was ordered anonymously and shipped to John RamseyÂ’s office the first week of 1997. The DA never followed up when informedÂ…

Judged:

3

3

3

Legal__Eagle wrote:

<quoted text>
I respect your answer, but considering the thread title, which is
RDIs, any reasonable doubt?
Why did you answer if you are not an RDI?

Judged:

2

2

1

Capricorn wrote:

I have no doubt that the Ramseys are involved in the death and cover up of this crime
I believe that Patsy wrote the note with John dictating.
I believe that there is NO evidence of an intruder entering or exiting the premises given the weather and all he/she would have to be wearing along with supposedly carrying stuff in too
I believe that the behavior of the Ramseys after the crime reinforces that belief. Their behavior speaks to people who are hiding something
I believe that the red herrings thrown out there by Smit and the other supporters were done to throw suspicion away from the Ramseys for good reason.
I believe the lack of cooperation, even fifteen years later, is suspicious
None of my doubts are reasonable

Judged:

1

1

1

Mama2JML wrote:

Do you think a jury would have been able to, or would now be able to convict any Ramsey of murder? We don't have all of the evidence, but based on what we do know, would it be possible? Do you believe the DNA evidence would be admissible, if not, I think the conviction would be more likely. Their are other evidentiary doubts I have as well. Although, the crime scene was beyond contaminated. If there are no other suspects investigated, I'm afraid this crime will never be solved in the most official sense of the word. Perhaps the lack of a solution after 15 years is the greatest indicator that a Ramsey is responsible. But, the opposite could also be true. I wish we knew more for certain. It seems even what we do know has RDI and IDI alternative explanations. Btw, good morning!:o) <quoted text>

Judged:

2

1

1

Capricorn wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I don't think a jury could convict anyone of this crime without a viable confession, nor would they get an indictment
The authorities would have to prove who did what. They can't convict a "family". They have to prove which Ramsey did exactly what and that will never be able to be proven without a confession, which won't happen
Good morning to you too

Judged:

1

1

1

Mama2JML wrote:

Is there any doubt in your mind that a Ramsey killed JB? If so, please elaborate...