|
Aintry1
Commerce, GA
|
Anti-K wrote: <quoted text> It’s called Burden of Proof. It must be proven that the tape and the cord came from the house and ALL effort towards that end met with failure. Could these items have come from the house regardless? Sure. But, you have to prove it and since ALL efforts failed to do so, it must be conceded that these items were most likely brought into the house. AK hahaha...tell the truth, lou smit knew your mother, right?
|
|
Since: Apr 09
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
cyber wrote: <quoted text>Are there no photos, period, from that Christmas party? Yes, but not publically available. You see RDI think the police are so dumb (and I agree to some point), but they think they are so dumb that they totally miss JB's hair was in braids when she was found dead but not when she was at the party, that is their ASSumption, the police just over looked it. RDI like to explain away things with fiction and conspiracies because reality doesn't suit them.
|
|
WV Sleuth
Winchester, VA
|
Until those photos become available for public consumption, anything anyone, including YOU state is just a guess.
|
|
Anti-K
Kamloops, Canada
|
Aintry1 wrote: <quoted text> hahaha...tell the truth, lou smit knew your mother, right? Intimately; just as he knew yours. AK
|
|
Anti-K
Kamloops, Canada
|
WV Sleuth wrote: Until those photos become available for public consumption, anything anyone, including YOU state is just a guess. So, you’re just guessing? That’s what I thought. AK
|
|
Since: Apr 09
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
WV Sleuth wrote: Until those photos become available for public consumption, anything anyone, including YOU state is just a guess. I don't need to guess. Those photos will not lead to the unknown male killer, so they are a moot point. The speculation of the party photos content and the photos having some significance that involve wrong doing by the Ramseys, is just another tool of the Devil and his minions, who's mission is to protect the real killer so he may roam free.
|
|
alf
Washington, DC
|
|
|
WV Sleuth
Winchester, VA
|
WV Sleuth wrote: Until those photos become available for public consumption, anything anyone, including YOU state is just a guess. Shill wrote: I don't need to guess. Those photos will not lead to the unknown male killer, so they are a moot point. The speculation of the party photos content and the photos having some significance that involve wrong doing by the Ramseys, is just another tool of the Devil and his minions, who's mission is to protect the real killer so he may roam free. The pictures would show what the style her hair was in, that's all. It will show whether the hairstyle was different, or not. That's all. It won't prove why she died or how she died or whodunnit. That's all. That's it. Good grief. Why must you connote something more? Oh, to prove once again, that anyone who doesn't believe everything happened as you do is wrong, has to be wrong, is only doing the devil's work, in fingering the Ramseys. Or even questioning it. Doesn't matter whether someone just wonders, if you aren't pulling for the Ramseys, you're common dirt, and you drove this poor woman Patsy to an untimely death from worry and mental crucifiction. Okay. Got it.
|
|
|
Since: Apr 09
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
WV Sleuth wrote: It will show whether the hairstyle was different, or not. That's all. It won't prove why she died or how she died or whodunnit. That's all. That's it. Good grief. Why must you connote something more? Excuse me WV Slueth, but you have me mistaken with those who are trying to connote something more from the photos, which I pointed out to show the lengths they will go to spread their hate. Did I not post "the photos prove nothing" in the post prior to this post of you asking "why must you connote something more?" I wish the photos and all the other evidence was made public so these urban legends could not be brought to life as tools for spreading hate.
|
|
Aintry1
Commerce, GA
|
Anti-K wrote: <quoted text> Intimately; just as he knew yours. AK lameass akk "it must be proven the tape came from the house" stupid smit
|
|
lee dummett222
Manchester, UK
|
the blow to the head was severe, and not accidental. i have always believed patsy and john were responsible. they refused to play ball with the police, and refused interviews, yet they talked to the media. they also refused a polygraph, and i believe its because they didnt want to get caught out. there behaviour from day one was suspicious, and thats because they are guilty.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|