Fox News: DNA not "caucasian"

Detroit Breakdown wrote:

Interesting indeed because Kdogg has never posted on this site. I wasn`t sure if it was kdogg or you because it`s a local Detroit post. Gary said that he was cleared because his DNA didn`t match because he put someone elses DNA on one of the OCCK kids. He said that one lawyer told him that it would look suspicious if he tried to get his DNA back, but Gary never said that it was about the OCCKillings. Kdogg said he talked to two police friends of his about this, but I haven`t talked to him recently.

Judged:

1

1

1

Autumn wrote:

<quoted text>
The DNA Identification Act of 1994 [contained within the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 and hereinafter referred to as "DNA Act"] provided the statutory authority for creation of the National DNA Index System (NDIS) and specified the type of data that could be included in this national index. Only the following types of DNA data may be stored in the national index administered by the FBI Director:
DNA identification records of persons convicted of crimes;
analyses of DNA samples recovered from crime scenes;
analyses of DNA samples recovered from unidentified human remains; and
analyses of DNA samples voluntarily contributed from relatives of missing persons. See 42 U.S.C.S.§14132(a).
www.fbi.gov/congress/congress01/dwight061201....
Also, Last paragraph page 8
Coordination of state and federal databank laws..
www.aslme.org/dna_04/grid/guide.pdf

Autumn wrote:

<quoted text>
That depends on if the sample was given voluntarily... Federal law prohibits states from entering Voluntary samples into CODIS....

Autumn wrote:

<quoted text>
They can keep it in the state database for however long the state law allows.... I was referring to CODIS... From what I've read of DB's suspect... Gary does not fit the Federal criteria for submission into CODIS...

Autumn wrote:

Have you {Those working on the OCCK case} ever read Signature killers, by Bob Keppel...?
It would probably help you understand why DB's suspect doesn't seem so far fetched to me... I'm not saying I think he is guilty of any of the crimes he has been accused of, to me he is just a name on a forum and without proof of his existence he will stay that way, but I do know that serial killers like he has been described as being by DB do exist and some keep on killing without detection for decades... The BTK is a prime example of that...
JonBenét's murder says anger retaliatory to me and anger retaliatory killers are defined by many experts as signature killers....
Without proof of guilt or innocence of a suspect everything at this point is just a theory.... I don't see the problem with anybody discussing their own theory... I am of the opinion that DB has just as much right as you or I do to pursue his suspect.... From what I can tell you don't know Gary, so you can't know for sure if he is innocent, guilty, make believe or not... I don't know either, but I'm not going to dismiss him completely until this case is solved, just in case....
DB seems to believe in his suspects involvement, but for me it is just an opinion he has, because I haven't seen proof one way or another that tells me that he is right or wrong about his serial killer theory...
As far as the OCCK case goes I have very little knowledge of that case or any suspects associated with it... I would suggest you make a thread here at this forum about it if you want to discuss it... That way we can all come to our own conclusions about the evidence in that case, instead of just being in the middle of your fight with DB....