CSIEngland's Theory

Let's hear it fraud.

Clueless Spam wrote:

Let's hear it fraud.

Why would you start this thread?

I know what you mean, but who cares what this colossal fraud's theory is? It's as phony as her DNA credentials.

CSIEngland ---
I don't know why someone wants to waste their time putting this thread here ??
You know your stuff, you know the case, you post very interesting posts.
Ignore the Bozos'. You're worth listening to.

cody wrote:

CSIEngland ---
I don't know why someone wants to waste their time putting this thread here ??
You know your stuff, you know the case, you post very interesting posts.
Ignore the Bozos'. You're worth listening to.

Thanks, Cody.

I'll give than about as much attention as I usually do, which is just about none at all. LOL I know I'm going to be drug into a fight.

candy wrote:

I know what you mean, but who cares what this colossal fraud's theory is? It's as phony as her DNA credentials.

One thing's for sure, you'll never see those credentials. Or anything else about me. That attempt you made to do so on the other thread was about as lame as it gets. I'd trust jameson with my personal information before you.

No theory, ta da! And she talks to a sock puppet name Steve Thomas.

This colossal fraud has been busted so many times and so easily, it makes your head spin:

Reply »
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Sep 30, 2009

Judged:


4


1


1

CISExgland is a brilliant DNA expert, super model, who lived on Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch and is married to "The Chef To The Stars", likes only old classic movies and reading books, and wastes endless hours blogging at Topix about how smart she is, what's not to believe?

I guess guys have their "Fantasy Football leagues", and some women have their "Fantasy CSI courtrooms".

Vance
Boston, MA
Reply »
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Oct 1, 2009

Judged:


1


1


1

Anti-Ks voice of sound (DNA) reason to unseat the absolute nonsense is spot on.

Not to overlook Shillton's nice little wrap-up with a pretty bow and all.

Well done!

Anti-K
Kamloops, Canada
Reply »
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#38 Oct 3, 2009
Judged:
1
1
1
CSIEngland wrote:
<quoted text>
How can ANYONE here be a fraud? <snip>
How to be a Fraud

1) Claim to be a university educated, ten years experienced working in CSI as a DNA expert testing/matching, replicating and amplifying DNA and analyzing crime scene evidence while testifying in Court as an expert in DNA, etc
2) Get simple, basic, fundamental concepts wrong (ie.: benefits and usage of STRs; acceptance and usage of PCR ; grossly mis-stating RMPs; etc; as seen above posts 3 – 9) and post them aggressively and frequently (see posts 3 – 9)

AK

There's no doubt that she talks to Thomas CS. That's him. He's forever been talking to the most vacuous posters, it's an ego thing, and they don't ask the questions that make him duck Lin Wood and the entire Boulder/Denver media.

He ignored Masked Man's GREAT questions of him on the APB board, like this, and answered every airhead one:

Steve,

Lou Smit didn't leave with the "entire case file," as you falsely claim. Smit has no police reports. He has some photographs that were being prepared on a CD before he quit. He kept that CD. Why are you spreading the lie that he has the whole case file??
How can you complain about "leaks," given your record of wholesale leaks? Who allowed Ann Bardach to read police reports? Who answered her every question? Who handed over the ransom note to her? YOU are the one who has and STILL is using case files to make money.

You were virtually running your own press office. Alex Hunter did nothing comparable to what you did. After only a few months into the investigation, you and Eller were manipulating the media and turning over confidential information to Vanity Fair. And YOU complain about "leaks"! Gimme a break.

candy wrote:

There's no doubt that she talks to Thomas CS. That's him. He's forever been talking to the most vacuous posters, it's an ego thing, and they don't ask the questions that make him duck Lin Wood and the entire Boulder/Denver media.
He ignored Masked Man's GREAT questions of him on the APB board, like this, and answered every airhead one:
Steve,
Lou Smit didn't leave with the "entire case file," as you falsely claim. Smit has no police reports. He has some photographs that were being prepared on a CD before he quit. He kept that CD. Why are you spreading the lie that he has the whole case file??
How can you complain about "leaks," given your record of wholesale leaks? Who allowed Ann Bardach to read police reports? Who answered her every question? Who handed over the ransom note to her? YOU are the one who has and STILL is using case files to make money.
You were virtually running your own press office. Alex Hunter did nothing comparable to what you did. After only a few months into the investigation, you and Eller were manipulating the media and turning over confidential information to Vanity Fair. And YOU complain about "leaks"! Gimme a break.

Why are you talking to ST here? I thought he tried to call you a few days ago? Why not just pick up the phone and say "hello"? Oh wait - that's right - he DIDN'T try to call you - that was just more of your made-up gibberish.

And still no theory from CSIFraud.

Legal_Eagle wrote:

<quoted text>
Why are you talking to ST here? I thought he tried to call you a few days ago? Why not just pick up the phone and say "hello"? Oh wait - that's right - he DIDN'T try to call you - that was just more of your made-up gibberish.

It doesn't take much to bring out that green eyed monster in Candy. All it takes is someone ELSE having access to a player in the case. Others know something she doesn't know, so the attack starts. So predicatable Candy.

Gee Candy, if you really want to know who CSI is, why not just ask Steve Thomas when he calls you again?:)

Capricorn wrote:

<quoted text>
It doesn't take much to bring out that green eyed monster in Candy. All it takes is someone ELSE having access to a player in the case. Others know something she doesn't know, so the attack starts. So predicatable Candy.
Gee Candy, if you really want to know who CSI is, why not just ask Steve Thomas when he calls you again?:)

Exactly Cap, if Candy is so on the inside with ST, then why not talk to him and get all her questions answered? BECAUSE HE IS NOT CALLING HER.

Plus, just because someone decides to start a thread like this Brother Moon, it doesn't mean CSIE is going to participate, nor should s/he. If I were to start a thread named "Candy wants to tell you why she does the idiotic things she does" - well, that wouldn't require Candy to respond unless she was the thread starter.

CSIEngland wrote:

I know I'm going to be drug into a fight.

No, you know you will have to participate in a discussion about a theory that you cannot back up with facts. 19 years on the case and you talk to a sock puppet named Steve Thomas and yet you have no clear understanding of the case.

So bring it. Burke hit JB, Patsy and John covered it up right?

Dumb groupies: From Crap: Gee Candy, if you really want to know who CSI is, why not just ask Steve Thomas when he calls you again?:)

From Legally Ignorant: Exactly Cap, if Candy is so on the inside with ST, then why not talk to him and get all her questions answered? BECAUSE HE IS NOT CALLING HER.

As I posted, I haven't talked to him since he settled with the Ramseys. When he calls, I DON'T ANSWER HIS CALLS. They show up on my caller ID and I don't answer them, and never will from him.

For Brother Moon, Thomas has a history of blowing off great MALE posters in this case, because he gets no ego satisfaction from it. He did the same thing to Cutter as he did to you, yet he answers the most vapid airheads non questions on the net from ST's Angel and CSI Fraud and the like.

During his case, MANY posters sent to his email GREAT info for his suit. He was not at all interested. Those emails with their work bounced back to him, from him not bothering to check his email, OR simply were never responded to. But the biggest airheads ALWAYS heard back from him.

candy wrote:

But the biggest airheads ALWAYS heard back from him.

Guess that must be why he USED to talk to you, LMAO.

candy wrote:

Dumb groupies: From Crap: Gee Candy, if you really want to know who CSI is, why not just ask Steve Thomas when he calls you again?:)
From Legally Ignorant: Exactly Cap, if Candy is so on the inside with ST, then why not talk to him and get all her questions answered? BECAUSE HE IS NOT CALLING HER.
As I posted, I haven't talked to him since he settled with the Ramseys. When he calls, I DON'T ANSWER HIS CALLS. They show up on my caller ID and I don't answer them, and never will from him.

Good because HE NEVER CALLS YOU - you would be talking to dead air. HA HA on the caller ID, shows how much YOU know!

Good grief, Candy. Can you be any more repugnant?

Earth to Candy. Steve isn't interested in YOU. Call him every vile name you want. He STILL isn't interested in YOU. Why don't you reserve a little bit of that bile for the KILLER in this case?