FOREIGN FACTION, byJames Kolar: Falsehoods, Fabrications, and Fraudulence?

Posted in the JonBenet Ramsey Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of562
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Jan 12

Vienna, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

6

5

4

After reading James Kolar's book, FOREIGN FACTION: WHO REALLY KIDNAPPED JONBENET?, I've noted many "new disclosures". The book is definitely an interesting read...

However, much of what I've read cannot simply be interpreted as being factual, indisputable evidence. There are many questionable assertions made with regard to the evidentiary DNA, the Ramsey family (Burke, most often), the investigation, behavioral and psychological evidence, linguistic analyses, etc. A vast amount of speculation based on suppositions, assumptions, and misleading interpretations of the crime(s) and the evidence are presented by Mr. Kolar.

It might benefit us to do some research with regard to information presented in Mr. Kolar's book.

Since: Jan 12

Vienna, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

5

4

4

An excerpt from Chapter 35 of Foreign Faction:

P. 412:
"I had supervised Horita during my stint as chief investigator at the D.A.'s office, and it was my opinion that he had a promising future ahead of him. He had no experience as a police officer, but he was an extremely intelligent young man." (Kolar J, 2012)

I do not doubt Andy Horita is intelligent, but I do not understand how he came to be responsible for presenting a "recap" of the DNA evidence in the JBR case. His Bachelor's degree is in Psychology. His Masters' degrees are in Social Work and Accountancy. Why was Horita the man chosen to present DNA evidence to a team of women and men with backgrounds in LE, Forensics, DNA, etc.?

P. 412-413 (cont'd):
"He looked decidedly dejected as he delivered the news about the additional DNA test results."
(Kolar J, 2012)

Was Horita unprepared for the reaction of the task force. His presentation of the evidentiary DNA analyses is ignorant at best. He likely appeared dejected because he was feeling dejected?...

Source:
Kolar, J.(2012). Foreign faction: Who really kidnapped jonbenet?. Telluride, Colorado: Ventus Publishing, llc.

“YES”

Since: Mar 07

TWICE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Mr. Kolar will never catch up to the amount of assertions, suppositions, misleading interpretations of the evidence, and inaccuracies presented by Smit and team Ramsey...never

You said "much" of what you've read cannot simply be interpreted as factual. Can you elaborate on what is FACTUAL? What is NOT factual and presented as factual?

Will you also be letting us all know what is NOT factual in Whitson/Smit's "book"?

What are you asserting is not factual in Kolar's book and can you elaborate as to why it isn't factual?

“YES”

Since: Mar 07

TWICE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Mama2JML wrote:
An excerpt from Chapter 35 of Foreign Faction:
P. 412:
"I had supervised Horita during my stint as chief investigator at the D.A.'s office, and it was my opinion that he had a promising future ahead of him. He had no experience as a police officer, but he was an extremely intelligent young man." (Kolar J, 2012)
I do not doubt Andy Horita is intelligent, but I do not understand how he came to be responsible for presenting a "recap" of the DNA evidence in the JBR case. His Bachelor's degree is in Psychology. His Masters' degrees are in Social Work and Accountancy. Why was Horita the man chosen to present DNA evidence to a team of women and men with backgrounds in LE, Forensics, DNA, etc.?
Can you tell us all the background and education of Smit and the other RST members who have commented on the DNA and presented the DNA as the smoking gun?(which it isn't)

I was unaware that Smit, Jameson, Mame, yourself and others have such extensive scientific backgrounds and am duly impressed that you do have the credentials to be commenting on it and asking to be believed.

Please do elaborate on who commented on the DNA being the smoking gun and the credentials they possess to do so. TIA

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Folks that think an intruder murdered little Jonbenet Ramsey canít seem to wrap their heads around one of the biggest insights into blatant ongoing abuse in the Ramsey family. The children were exhibiting rare behavior with their feces, ecopresis. It isnít just in Kolarís book, itís a series of dots you can connect to see how disturbing the children were.

Housekeeper #1 said Burke smeared his feces. Housekeeper #2 said Jonbenet left grapefruit size turds in her bed. In interviews Patsy was asked about feces photographed in underwear on the bathroom floor. Nedra had special wording - dirtying herself, for Jonbenetís 'problem'.
Detective Smith claims all the underwear of Jonbenetís was stained from feces. In Kolarís book is releted information about a candy box smeared with feces and a pair of Burkeís pajama bottoms with a fresh load of shite.

Itís as obvious a symptom of ongoing abuse and torture as if the kids showed up in an ER covered in cigarette burns and bleeding from the anus. The big question is why did Lou Smit turn a blind eye and claim there was no history of abuse? A family with children leaving their feces laying around is a family were incest, abuse, and murder will occur.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Kolar's message is so damning all you can do is attack the messenger. Classic. Kolar has no vested interest in anything but the truth.

There was no intruder. Patsy was so deficient in her parenting, so inappropriatley engrossed in kiddie beauty pageants the children were behaving like wild animals attacking each other.

Since: Sep 11

Germiston, South Africa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Mama2JML wrote:
An excerpt from Chapter 35 of Foreign Faction:
P. 412:
"I had supervised Horita during my stint as chief investigator at the D.A.'s office, and it was my opinion that he had a promising future ahead of him. He had no experience as a police officer, but he was an extremely intelligent young man." (Kolar J, 2012)
I do not doubt Andy Horita is intelligent, but I do not understand how he came to be responsible for presenting a "recap" of the DNA evidence in the JBR case. His Bachelor's degree is in Psychology. His Masters' degrees are in Social Work and Accountancy. Why was Horita the man chosen to present DNA evidence to a team of women and men with backgrounds in LE, Forensics, DNA, etc.?
P. 412-413 (cont'd):
"He looked decidedly dejected as he delivered the news about the additional DNA test results."
(Kolar J, 2012)
Was Horita unprepared for the reaction of the task force. His presentation of the evidentiary DNA analyses is ignorant at best. He likely appeared dejected because he was feeling dejected?...
Source:
Kolar, J.(2012). Foreign faction: Who really kidnapped jonbenet?. Telluride, Colorado: Ventus Publishing, llc.
That IS strange, Mama. Why would they choose someone with no scientific background to do a DNA presentation? I know that Andy Horita, together with Peter Maguire, did once spend a day with the staff at Bode, but that would hardly equip him with sufficient knowledge to do an expert presentation. Psychology, social work and accountancy is about as far removed as it gets.

Since: Sep 11

Germiston, South Africa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

3

moonjack wrote:
Kolar's message is so damning all you can do is attack the messenger. Classic. Kolar has no vested interest in anything but the truth.
There was no intruder. Patsy was so deficient in her parenting, so inappropriatley engrossed in kiddie beauty pageants the children were behaving like wild animals attacking each other.
Lol, moonjack! Much as you annoy me, I can't help laughing at some of the rubbish you post. Now those kids were wild animals attacking each other! Where do you come up with all this stuff?:)

Since: Sep 11

Germiston, South Africa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

5

4

3

moonjack wrote:
Folks that think an intruder murdered little Jonbenet Ramsey canít seem to wrap their heads around one of the biggest insights into blatant ongoing abuse in the Ramsey family. The children were exhibiting rare behavior with their feces, ecopresis. It isnít just in Kolarís book, itís a series of dots you can connect to see how disturbing the children were.
Housekeeper #1 said Burke smeared his feces. Housekeeper #2 said Jonbenet left grapefruit size turds in her bed. In interviews Patsy was asked about feces photographed in underwear on the bathroom floor. Nedra had special wording - dirtying herself, for Jonbenetís 'problem'.
Detective Smith claims all the underwear of Jonbenetís was stained from feces. In Kolarís book is releted information about a candy box smeared with feces and a pair of Burkeís pajama bottoms with a fresh load of shite.
Itís as obvious a symptom of ongoing abuse and torture as if the kids showed up in an ER covered in cigarette burns and bleeding from the anus. The big question is why did Lou Smit turn a blind eye and claim there was no history of abuse? A family with children leaving their feces laying around is a family were incest, abuse, and murder will occur.
And yet no one ever said the Ramseys' house stank. Maybe those kids passed a special type of odourless faeces?:)

“Nothing is foolproof to a”

Since: Jul 10

sufficiently talented fool

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

The same way Smit presented information he wasn't an expert on to the GJ.
Lynette 22 wrote:
<quoted text> That IS strange, Mama. Why would they choose someone with no scientific background to do a DNA presentation? I know that Andy Horita, together with Peter Maguire, did once spend a day with the staff at Bode, but that would hardly equip him with sufficient knowledge to do an expert presentation. Psychology, social work and accountancy is about as far removed as it gets.
question

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

2

---www.hide-news.org/forum/new s/jonbenet-ramsey/T8PSLQ56N9QL HSSOE

Since: Sep 11

Germiston, South Africa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

DrSeussMd wrote:
The same way Smit presented information he wasn't an expert on to the GJ.
<quoted text>
What's with you RDI and these latest, renewed attacks on Lou Smit? Are you that intimidated by him?

“Nothing is foolproof to a”

Since: Jul 10

sufficiently talented fool

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Not at all, it was a legitimate comparison.
Lynette 22 wrote:
<quoted text> What's with you RDI and these latest, renewed attacks on Lou Smit? Are you that intimidated by him?

“Nothing is foolproof to a”

Since: Jul 10

sufficiently talented fool

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

I can't, however, answer for anyone else!
Lynette 22 wrote:
<quoted text> What's with you RDI and these latest, renewed attacks on Lou Smit? Are you that intimidated by him?
Biz

Palm Harbor, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

3

Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you tell us all the background and education of Smit and the other RST members who have commented on the DNA and presented the DNA as the smoking gun?(which it isn't)
I was unaware that Smit, Jameson, Mame, yourself and others have such extensive scientific backgrounds and am duly impressed that you do have the credentials to be commenting on it and asking to be believed.
Please do elaborate on who commented on the DNA being the smoking gun and the credentials they possess to do so. TIA
Smit's reputation speaks for itself. He is a legend detective. Admired and respected. We have posted his credentials several times. Do we really need to go and dig it up again?
Biz

Palm Harbor, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

4

At least Smit was a REAL DETECTIVE, unlike Horita, an accountant, lol

“Nothing is foolproof to a”

Since: Jul 10

sufficiently talented fool

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

A PRIVATE detective who manufactured information, re-engineered photos to portray an inaccurate crime scene, prayed with the people under the umbrella of suspicion while advocating he was running an impartial investigation, stun gunned a pig and lied about the results, and went into the GJ with NO discernible credentials other than a PI license that takes no training to obtain to relay his propaganda - so not so much an expert after all - but I can see why the IDI think the way they do.

They also must think there is a President school somewhere, or a Senate school, or a council person school, a secretary of state school, LOL. They aren't astute enough to understand all of the elected offices in the land were business people first, and lawyers. So shortsighted!
Biz wrote:
At least Smit was a REAL DETECTIVE, unlike Horita, an accountant, lol

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Smit had to fabricate himself just to get on the force. He spent his career in a two bit town where anything of significance would have been under the watch of Military Police.

His legend is he LIED and obstructed justice.

Since: May 11

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Hey y'all! Got my book last night..exciting:D Only got to the morning of, too tired to keep going but I like his style.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Aug 31, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Smit had no professional Law Enforcement education when he joined the force. He studied to be an engineer and ended up assisting to fabricate one of the biggest hoaxes in criminal history.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 20 of562
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

16 Users are viewing the JonBenet Ramsey Forum right now

Search the JonBenet Ramsey Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty (Sep '08) 1 hr OneWhoCares 7,398
Boulder Police to take over Ramsey case (Feb '09) Fri Lovely 9
Boulder in the 70s Apr 16 gotgum 7
Similarities between the Ramseys and Jeffrey Da... Apr 16 smashmk 1
JonBenet Investigation (Nov '11) Apr 15 updates 1,595
Hair Apr 12 JimmyWells 5
Undisclosed crime scene images. Apr 11 candy 5
•••
•••
•••
•••