Chick-Fil-A under attack over nonsense

Judged:

1

X -Man- wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh brother, do you want to compare statistics of "intolerance" between homosexuals and heterosexuals?
How many homosexuals have been treated like they were less than human by so called "Christians" or people with "traditional" values? How many beatings? How many deaths for just being who they are?
The reality is that your traditional values are based on prejudice against other human beings.

Paul wrote:

By the way, isn't "Christian Business" an oxymoron?

Judged:

1

1

1

grinder wrote:

<quoted text>
So there is an insight as to what you believe.
Traditional values are based on a Judeo/Christian world view that is defined through God's Word.
Your statement equates God with being hateful and prejudice. You are afforded the right in our country to think that way and likewise other people are given the right to uphold their views and beliefs that God defines right and wrong.
The reality is that good people do not become bad people simply because they hold a different view than you regarding homosexuality.

Judged:

2

2

2

McGruff wrote:

<quoted text>
yes. Why not? It isn't a right. Isn't mentioned in the constitution. No where is it mentioned. And yes the right to marry could be taken away.

Judged:

2

1

1

grinder wrote:

<quoted text>
So there is an insight as to what you believe.
Traditional values are based on a Judeo/Christian world view that is defined through God's Word.
Your statement equates God with being hateful and prejudice. You are afforded the right in our country to think that way and likewise other people are given the right to uphold their views and beliefs that God defines right and wrong.
The reality is that good people do not become bad people simply because they hold a different view than you regarding homosexuality.

Judged:

1

1

1

PATRIOT wrote:

I support a federal law that would deny gays, or gay activists, from purchasing, owning, carrying, or using any type of firearm-specifically those gays, or gay activists, that hide behind a bucket of chicken sandwhiches, which obvioulsy obstructed the aiming of the weapon.
I also support a federal law that would restrict gays, or gay activists, from purchasing a "bucket" of anything, or even a "bucket" in any shape or form, that could be used to conceal criminal intent.
I also support a federal law that would prohibit gays, or gay activists, from purchasing any sort of food product that required the killing of an animal, and then used in a conspiracy, or act, to commit a criminal offense.(That's kinda chicken s--t thinking to me).
I also support a federal law that would require gays, or gay activists, to refrain from being gay.

Judged:

1

1

1

_White American_ wrote:

<quoted text>I see, you believe in gun control and doing away with the Constitution. What kind of Patriot are you?

Judged:

1

1

1

_White American_ wrote:

<quoted text>"The reality is that good people do not become bad people simply because they hold a different view than you regarding homosexuality."
The same can be said for you.
What happened to separation of church and state? I'm a Christian that believes that as one we are to love our fellow man/woman. Not hate, beat or deny them equal rights.

Judged:

2

1

1

equalityboy81 wrote:

<quoted text>
If it's not a right then it must be a privilege and privileges have to be earned and they can be take away. I guess liking the opposite gender is privileged. Just goes to show the inequality in this country. So if a man marries and divorces several women he should have his right to marry taken away by a judge because he's abused that privilege and abused the sanctity of marriage? He is therefore unfit for marriage and should have that privilege take away so he can never marry again. Is that constitutional? If marriage isn't protected in the constitution and is not a constitutional right then the scenario I presented should be constitutional to deny a man the right to marry a woman. Why not ban divorce?

Judged:

2

1

1

Rogerg wrote:

<quoted text>
That would be a Democracy, that's why we have a Republic, For now anyway.

Judged:

2

just an allusion wrote:

<quoted text>
I have, that is why I am able to post links to credible sources that all support my position on the matter at hand and why you, and others like yourself, can post only baseless speculation, innuendo and self-enforcing, specious allegations of merit.
If you come to play, you should at least bring a ball....

Judged:

1

1

1

Brian_G wrote:

A security guard at the Family Research Council's headquarters in Washington, D.C. is being hailed as a hero after he stopped a gunman posing as an intern, taking a bullet in the arm before wrestling the suspect to the ground.
The gunman entered the lobby of the organization's Chinatown headquarters around 10:45 and expressed disagreement with the conservative group's policy positions, Fox News has learned. When the guard, who was not identified, asked him where he was going, he opened fire, according to police.
“The security guard here is a hero, as far as I’m concerned,” D.C. Police Chief Cathy Lanier said.”He did his job. The person never made it past the front.”
The guard, who was not identified, was shot in the arm and was conscious after the shooting and was in stable condition. The gunman, who also was not identified, was being questioned by the FBI, sources said. Sources said he is in his twenties...
Sources told Fox New that after guard took away his gun, the suspect said, "Don't shoot me, it was not about you, it was what this place stands for."
Authorities were treating the attack as a case of domestic terrorism, although James McJunkin, the head of the FBI’s Washington Field Office, said authorities do not yet know the gunman's motive...
http://nation.foxnews.com/family-research-cou...

Judged:

2

just an allusion wrote:

<quoted text>
I am in agreement with your perception of the situation given the simple observation that men are men and meant to be so, and women are women and meant to be so.

Judged:

2

1

1

grinder wrote:

<quoted text>
Which word(s) is causing you to see a conflict?
All through old and new testament writings, there are people working and running businesses.
Jesus was a carpenter, by trade.
Paul, a tent maker, said he ensured that he worked so as to not be a burden on others.(America could sure use that message today!)

Judged:

1

1

1

Quirky wrote:

<quoted text>
Move Back to Mexico you Traitor Old Bag!

Judged:

2

PATRIOT wrote:

<quoted text>
Just because a heterosexual Christian doesn't agree with the homosexual life style and agenda doesn't mean it is automatically hateful motivated disagreement. I am a heterosexual Christian who does not embrace homosexuality-my right to believe this is equal to any right of the gay community. But the gay community wants to demonize everything about my core social, political, and religious beliefs by attacking me and others of the same beliefs with name calling and vicious verbal attacks.
So, gay folks and supporters of gay folks, if you squeeze the frog to hard, it will piss on you. Don't want to be pissed on? Quit pushing your agenda so hard.

Judged:

1

1

1

NoQ wrote:

<quoted text>
Get that D:ck out of your mouth while you're talking, you won't cough so much.