Could man-made clouds solve global warming?

No. Next question?

NobodyYouEverWantToKnow, aka:

LessFactMoreHype wrote:

No.

Have you been in touch with the Harvard researchers telling them that?
I'm sure they'd be grateful for your expert input?

NoFactAllHype wrote:

Next question?

So now you know better than Harvard researches, Mr Undoubtably Spelt Fourty?
Would you care to publish your in-depth findings on the subject here, including the main reasons why reflecting the sun's rays wouldn't work?

steenking piddling wrote:

So now you know better than Harvard researches.....

Nutin' new here. Just repubs & business ready to stoke up the smokestacks that pumped lots of sulphur & pollutants into the atmosphere & created lots of acid rain, lung, heart, & neurological diseases before emissions standards took hold in the 1970's.

Oh, yeah. I shouldn't shorten too much the name of 'steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger, earthling has no brain, eart hling(alien has no affinity to Earth), injun killer(has no love for human beings) dirtling.

The Harvard experts think that they can find ways to effect global climate?

Post #1 eloquently reads: "No. Next question?"

-koolaid

PS:
To all AGW heretics- Please join me in welcoming our newest fellow heretic.

dont drink the koolaid wrote:

Post #1 eloquently reads: "No. Next question?"

Compared to his usual efforts, that's quite good for Mr Undoubtably Spelt Fourty.
A few examples:
Forty is spelt with a U
Etymology is not a serious subject
Deforestations is a consequence of AGW
Epistemologists compile dictionaries
Epystemologists compile dictionaries
Samuel Johnson was an American
Ice calving is restricted by size
Spelt is only an ancient grain
The equator doesn't have season
Cars can be charged with road collisions
Vikings didn't know how to live in a warmer Greenland
How much heat you are transferring at one time has NO relationship to the temperature of any objects
Alberta is a country
New Moore island is in the MOUTH of the several rivers
Insects and plants don't qualify as species
Enercon install offshore wind generators
Scientific laws are not science
Climate and weather are not 'linked'
Predictions are for astrologers
Ethanol is a very workable and effective solution
AGW is just the warming of the global average surface temperature due to GHGs
AGW is the global average
The science says that human emissions are responsible for MOST of AGW, which has SOME unknown but significant part of climate change
The IPCC report of 2001 and 2007 clearly show that GHGs are by far the largest contributor but not the exclusive contributor to AGW
America has two political parties
Climate and weather are not 'linked'
'nondenier' is a real word
Fruiting plants are especially chosen by bees for, "polination"
We acted on CFCs in the 70s
CO2 is not vital for life on planet Earth.
CO2 causes, "thermal pollution"
CO2 is a 'thermal pollutant'
CO2 levels are rising faster than the temperature can react
AGW is comparable to the Holocaust
Please show this 'ararmist club' and membership list.
And theory is the endpoint of science.
The 'unproven' stuff is 'hypothesis'.
The fact that all the scientific authorities confirm AGW as theory means that it IS science fact as defined.
There are no 'laws of science'
Scientific laws are NOT science
the science isn't going to change
While the science doesn't change rapidly it does change
And nowhere is there 'skepticism' of the science
Experiment is NOT science
Experiment can only give you data. It cannot PROVE anything

With all the hot air spewed by the "dirtling" Harvard wouldn't have a chance.

IPCC Admits Its Past Reports Were Junk

http://www.climaterealists.org.nz/node/914

-----

The new global currency Carbon credits - to control YOU

http://www.climaterealists.org.nz/node/912

Patriot wrote:

IPCC Admits Its Past Reports Were Junk
http://www.climaterealists.org.nz/node/914
-----
The new global currency Carbon credits - to control YOU
http://www.climaterealists.org.nz/node/912

It wouldn't matter if Jimbo Hansen and Mickey Mann both admitted they were wrong and made a public apology, the faithful would still believe that Glowbull warming will soon be a catastrophe.

Earthling-1 wrote:

<quoted text>It wouldn't matter if Jimbo Hansen and Mickey Mann both admitted they were wrong and made a public apology, the faithful would still believe that Glowbull warming will soon be a catastrophe.

-------

"They perish because they refused to love the Truth..."

http://niv.scripturetext.com/2_thessalonians/...

Patriot wrote:

"They perish because they refused to love the Truth..."
http://niv.scripturetext.com/2_thessalonians/...

Oops, sorry if I gave you the impression that I might be religious.
I occasionally quote a few scrips I remember from childhood that I learned by rote, but that's about it.