Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

Posted in the Global Warming Forum

Read

24,423 Comments

Add to my Tracker

More Global Warming Discussions »

Comments (Page 968)

Showing posts 19,341 - 19,360 of24,423

< prev page

next page >

Go to last page| Jump to page:

SpaceBlues Houston, TX	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20313 Jul 30, 2012 Judged: 4 3 3 Mothra wrote: <quoted text> <sigh> How predictable... the I said-you said minutia. But for the fun of it, you said it was "alleged". al·leged/əˈl ejd/ Adjective: (of an incident or a person) Said, without proof, to have taken place or to have a specified illegal or undesirable quality. See that, "Said, without proof". The report exists, thus it itself is proof that it exists and cannot be an "alleged" report. You're such a pretentious boor. You are still calling it a report. It's an alleged pre-publication draft paper. SpaceBlues wrote: <quoted text>Pathetic response to a post where I proved you copied my post and sent it to me as your reply. Come on, do it again! I never said I "won't read the draft report" because I do read draft reports of mine and others'. However, I did say what to expect of this Anthony guy. Why do you call an alleged pre-publication draft paper a report? FYI. A report is not a paper or vice versa. You are way beyond the limits of your ignorance. Again. Why do you call an alleged pre-publication draft paper a report? FYI. A report is not a paper or vice versa. You are way beyond the limits of your ignorance. SpaceBlues wrote: <quoted text>Hey, this alleged pre-publication draft paper may never see the daylight in a science journal. Is that why you started calling it a draft report? Read my post before this one. Heck, you don't know about any of the shoptalk but you come in to Topix to lie, twist, and misrepresent. You can't even place quotation marks properly. Again, this alleged pre-publication draft paper may never see the daylight in a science journal. Is that why you started calling it a draft report? Read my post before this one.
SpaceBlues Houston, TX	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20314 Jul 30, 2012 Judged: 4 3 3 Mothra wrote: <quoted text> Awww... po' widdles Spacey got his lunch handed to him now he's a big tough guy. Loser. n't know the difference between a paper and a report. Read it again, fyi: Mothra wrote: <quoted text> <sigh> How predictable... the I said-you said minutia. But for the fun of it, you said it was "alleged". al·leged/əˈl ejd/ Adjective: (of an incident or a person) Said, without proof, to have taken place or to have a specified illegal or undesirable quality. See that, "Said, without proof". The report exists, thus it itself is proof that it exists and cannot be an "alleged" report. You're such a pretentious boor. You are still calling it a report. It's an alleged pre-publication draft paper. SpaceBlues wrote: <quoted text>Pathetic response to a post where I proved you copied my post and sent it to me as your reply. Come on, do it again! I never said I "won't read the draft report" because I do read draft reports of mine and others'. However, I did say what to expect of this Anthony guy. Why do you call an alleged pre-publication draft paper a report? FYI. A report is not a paper or vice versa. You are way beyond the limits of your ignorance. Again. Why do you call an alleged pre-publication draft paper a report? FYI. A report is not a paper or vice versa. You are way beyond the limits of your ignorance. SpaceBlues wrote: <quoted text>Hey, this alleged pre-publication draft paper may never see the daylight in a science journal. Is that why you started calling it a draft report? Read my post before this one. Heck, you don't know about any of the shoptalk but you come in to Topix to lie, twist, and misrepresent. You can't even place quotation marks properly. Again, this alleged pre-publication draft paper may never see the daylight in a science journal. Is that why you started calling it a draft report? Read my post before this one. P.S. Twist again like you did last post. Again, here we go again like you did last post.
SpaceBlues Houston, TX	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20315 Jul 30, 2012 Seattle Slew wrote: <quoted text>Lots of reports "exist" which are written, but never published, because they're flawed... Is your purpose to admit, you NEED poor material, to have a point ??? WOW ~! Pretty stupid, even for a jeffy half man... True. Excellent.
SpaceBlues Houston, TX	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20316 Jul 30, 2012 Judged: 3 2 2 Mothra wrote: <quoted text> See my previous post on "alleged". btw, I didn't say it was a 'draft'- the author did. Is it reading or comprehension that's your problem? That's your problem plus you don't know the difference between a report and a paper. As to alleged, it's an alleged pre-publication draft paper. But you don't get it. It's alright. There are many many things you don't understand like journal papers, reports, quotation marks, peer reviews, etc.
Mothra Phoenix, AZ	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20317 Jul 30, 2012 Judged: 2 2 2 SpaceBlues wrote: <quoted text>That's your problem plus you don't know the difference between a report and a paper. As to alleged, it's an alleged pre-publication draft paper. But you don't get it. It's alright. There are many many things you don't understand like journal papers, reports, quotation marks, peer reviews, etc. Blah, blah, blah, blah.... Keep on spinning, twisting and digging up minutia. Half a day and 60 posts later you're still playing word games, and not addressing the contents from the link I gave you.(I dare not call it a report, since that would likely get you rambling again.) I trust eventually you'll say something of consequence, but that won't be a while yet as I'm sure you've got a few more obfuscations handy.
OregonSUX Since: Apr 12 10,888 Location hidden	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20318 Jul 30, 2012 Judged: 2 2 1 SpaceBlues wrote: <quoted text>For what? For the previous post to that post. "1. The do-nothing scenario ("business as usual") gives us a global temperature increase of 4°–7°C (up to 12°F) by 2100. 2. James Hansen's mass-extinction scenario occurs at 3°C (5.4°F). 3. Staying below 2°C (3.6°F) will take urgent, deep and long-lasting cuts in fossil fuel use, and active preservation of the world’s forests. 4. This is at heart a political problem, not a scientific one."
Earthling-1 “Happy, warm and comfortable” Since: Oct 10 20,385 Mountain hideaway, SE Spain	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20319 Jul 31, 2012 questioner wrote: Yes, mother nature is not concerened with mankind's life, liberty and {the pursuit of happiness = USA version}{property = French version} or for that matter our continued existence. What we do is 99.999% pointless. Thank goodness it was fun doing some of it, albeit short lived. Ö¿Ö
Earthling-1 “Happy, warm and comfortable” Since: Oct 10 20,385 Mountain hideaway, SE Spain	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20320 Jul 31, 2012 Whitetrash wrote: Hey, this alleged pre-publication draft paper may never see the daylight in a science journal. Is that why you started calling it a draft report? Read my post before this one. Heck, you don't know about any of the shoptalk but you come in to Topix to lie, twist, and misrepresent. You can't even place quotation marks properly. You are still calling it a report. It's an alleged pre-publication draft paper. Again. Why do you call an alleged pre-publication draft paper a report? FYI. A report is not a paper or vice versa. You are way beyond the limits of your ignorance. Again, this alleged pre-publication draft paper may never see the daylight in a science journal. Is that why you started calling it a draft report? Read my post before this one. n't know the difference between a paper and a report. Read it again, fyi: You are still calling it a report. It's an alleged pre-publication draft paper. Again. Why do you call an alleged pre-publication draft paper a report? FYI. A report is not a paper or vice versa. You are way beyond the limits of your ignorance. Again, this alleged pre-publication draft paper may never see the daylight in a science journal. Is that why you started calling it a draft report? Read my post before this one. P.S. Twist again like you did last post. Again, here we go again like you did last post. That's your problem plus you don't know the difference between a report and a paper. As to alleged, it's an alleged pre-publication draft paper. It was good enough for Muller, but not for Watts? I know that is prior to acceptance, but in the tradition that I grew up in (under Nobel Laureate Luis Alvarez) we always widely distributed “preprints” of papers prior to their publication or even submission. That guaranteed a much wider peer review than we obtained from mere referees. Richard Muller

Earthling-1 “Happy, warm and comfortable” Since: Oct 10 20,385 Mountain hideaway, SE Spain	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20321 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 1 1 October 20, 2011 "The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project puts PR before peer review A real scientist would be embarrassed by the Berkeley PR project Rat is trumpeting. - Readers may recall this post last week where I complained about being put in a uncomfortable quandary by an author of a new paper. Despite that, I chose to honor the confidentiality request of the author Dr. Richard Muller, even though I knew that behind the scenes, they were planning a media blitz to MSM outlets. In the past few days I have been contacted by James Astill of the Economist, Ian Sample of the Guardian, and Leslie Kaufman of the New York Times. They have all contacted me regarding the release of papers from BEST today. There’s only one problem: Not one of the BEST papers have completed peer review. Nor has one has been published in a journal to my knowledge, nor is the one paper I’ve been asked to comment on in press at JGR,(where I was told it was submitted) yet BEST is making a “pre-peer review” media blitz."
Earthling-1 “Happy, warm and comfortable” Since: Oct 10 20,385 Mountain hideaway, SE Spain	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20322 Jul 31, 2012 Oops, here's a link: http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7o97i3r0P1...
okb2 Since: Jul 12 4,515 Chester, VA	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20323 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 2 2 2 Mothra wrote: <quoted text> Blah, blah, blah, blah.... Keep on spinning, twisting and digging up minutia. Half a day and 60 posts later you're still playing word games, and not addressing the contents from the link I gave you.(I dare not call it a report, since that would likely get you rambling again.) I trust eventually you'll say something of consequence, but that won't be a while yet as I'm sure you've got a few more obfuscations handy. Simple, what proof do you have that he is serious about publishing his paper? Who has he submitted the "Draft" to in order to prepare it for publication? HINT: In most circles it is rare that a "DRAFT" be made public for various professional reasons. However, if the "DRAFT" was not intended for publication a paid writer might release a draft publicly and then distance himself from it in order to protect what little was left of his reputation.
okb2 Since: Jul 12 4,515 Chester, VA	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20324 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 3 2 2 Earthling-1 wrote: Oops, here's a link: http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7o97i3r0P1... Interesting. And who hear has brought that up other than you? Are you bringing up BS to substantiate your own BS? And what was that link to again?
Toidi Slayer Saint Paul, MN	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20325 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 2 1 1 The temperature record from stations across the U.S. has been systematically overinflated due to faulty data manipulation and “encroaching urbanity”-- locations near asphalt, air conditioning and airports -- according to a new study. And if correct, it calls into question just how hot our planet is getting. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/07/30/wea...
SpaceBlues Houston, TX	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20326 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 3 2 2 Mothra wrote: <quoted text> Blah, blah, blah, blah.... Keep on spinning, twisting and digging up minutia. Half a day and 60 posts later you're still playing word games, and not addressing the contents from the link I gave you.(I dare not call it a report, since that would likely get you rambling again.) I trust eventually you'll say something of consequence, but that won't be a while yet as I'm sure you've got a few more obfuscations handy. Hey blaher, like I said you twist, lie, and misrepresent. Who's the decider for minutia, consequence, etc? LOL, NOT you. I wrote in the first two posts about what's going on. Go back and read them. Yeah, you got pinned down in your games. You are stuck with the Anthony-what's-his-name. Hey that's the reward for being a denier. The human-jnduced climate change is raging on meanwhile and you are wasting time with his alleged pre-publication draft paper of NO consequence.
SpaceBlues Houston, TX	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20327 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 6 5 3 The human-induced climate change is raging on meanwhile and you are wasting time with an alleged pre-publication draft paper of NO consequence.
Mothra Phoenix, AZ	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20328 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 4 2 2 SpaceBlues wrote: <quoted text>Hey blaher, like I said you [prattling minutia omitted <sigh> More blather.
Mothra Phoenix, AZ	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20329 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 3 3 2 SpaceBlues wrote: The human-induced climate change is raging on meanwhile and you are wasting time with an alleged pre-publication draft paper of NO consequence. No consequence? Why.... ahh... never mind. You're tiresome. I'll just chalk it up as another warmists strategy of delay, obfuscation, denial or lack of honesty. Dismissed.
Seattle Slew Seattle, WA	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20330 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 5 5 3 So, it's indefensible, you're a moron, using work not accepted by peers, and you're a peer putz... did I cover it all ??? Geez, have SOME self respect and keep your stupidity under wraps.
okb2 Since: Jul 12 4,515 Chester, VA	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20331 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 3 3 2 Seattle Slew wrote: So, it's indefensible, you're a moron, using work not accepted by peers, and you're a peer putz... did I cover it all ??? Geez, have SOME self respect and keep your stupidity under wraps. Nothing new from the other side.
Seattle Slew Seattle, WA	Reply » \| Report Abuse \| Judge it! \| #20332 Jul 31, 2012 Judged: 4 3 2 Since, we're discussion "unpublished proof", try to keep up troll.... LMAOROTFu~! Let's ALL choose sides and write stupidly, like the troll...
Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required) Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 19,341 - 19,360 of24,423

< prev page

next page >

Go to last page| Jump to page:

Type in your comments below

Name
(appears on your post)

Comments

Characters left: 4000

Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

15 Users are viewing the Global Warming Forum right now

Search the Global Warming Forum:

Topic	Updated	Last By	Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08)	13 min	Fair Game	34,005
Survey finds 97% climate science papers agree w...	19 min	WDRussell	90
Will it, won't it? Part 3 (Aug '12)	2 hr	SpaceBlues	807
Global Warming Standup Comedy (Apr '07)	3 hr	SpaceBlues	2,646
Expert: We must act fast on warming (Sep '08)	5 hr	litesong	26,088
India Ink: India Arrives at the Arctic	6 hr	litesong	1
Extreme global warming seen further away than p...	9 hr	Fair Game	3