Bill Maher: Climate Change Deniers Are "So Stupid They Make ME Question Evolution"

Why the hell did Maher start the fires in the first place.

Bill Maher is the idiot.

The climate is always changing from one Ice Age to another with warming periods in between.

But human-caused global warming is still unproven and actually losing support among scientists.

That's right liberals - insult anyone that doesn't agree with you.

Nazi's, thugs, liars, stupid - did I miss any from ust this years?

When will Maher's 15 minutes of fame end. I believe he has over stayed his visit. He just further proves the theory that "Liberalism is a non-treatable mental disorder". He is one sick puppy.

Bill you are Stupid ! why don't you have one leg shortened so you can walk like the Neanderthal you are. You freakin retard ! Like what you say means something ! STFU ! and crawl back in your cave.

wowee...

If Bill Maher is making the claim guess we've all better listen....

<crickets>

Maher is 100% correct! These Conservative fools are so clueless that they would prefer to risk the future of humanity rather than heed scientific research!

I agree with him on one point, anyone who, "denies" climate change must be an idiot.
Anyone sceptical of the hype surrounding AGW and CO2 as the main cause gets my vote of confidence.

Anyone who believes the science just because it sounds logical and not questioning it at every turn with opposing evidence, is "So Stupid They Make ME Question Evolution"

NB: If any alarmist answers this post, I know what their question will be, "What opposing evidence?"
My reply will be, "Look for it yourself, there's plenty!"

Earthling wrote:

NB: If any alarmist answers this post, I know what their question will be, "What opposing evidence?"

Wrong. My question is: why do you post when you're to drunk to write coherent sentences?

Typo: too drunk

I don't believe ANYONE disputes climate change. The Earth's climate is ALWAYS changing, it has to. Many people dispute man made Global Warming. Bill, you have to start doing your research and quit running your mouth off.

Ohhhh hohoh ho hoh ahhhhahahahaha, wht a fcuking maroon, Global warming, it never gets old with these people. I really don’t know which party has the dumber followers the democrats or the republicans. They’re both pretty fcuking stupid and I doubt anyone can come up with who is dumber. Just when you think you have it all figured out, here comes another dumb ass from either party with something else just as stupid if not more and the best thing about it all is they have people that follow them in all this crap. BWAHAhhahahahahaaha, how fcuking funny is this? Oh keep it all you lame brains I love the entertainment and it’s free.

Fair Game wrote:

Typo: too drunk

Wow!

There s my point exactly, one party follower correcting another party follower on their grammar and spelling and fcuking that up. Bwahahhahahahhaha, Oh I love you guys. Entertain me!!

Earthling wrote:

I agree with him on one point, anyone who, "denies" climate change must be an idiot.
Anyone sceptical of the hype surrounding AGW and CO2 as the main cause gets my vote of confidence.
Anyone who believes the science just because it sounds logical and not questioning it at every turn with opposing evidence, is "So Stupid They Make ME Question Evolution"
NB: If any alarmist answers this post, I know what their question will be, "What opposing evidence?"
My reply will be, "Look for it yourself, there's plenty!"

Yes, climate is changing slightly +/- all the time. We're on a cooling trend now & for the last 11 years.

Russian scientist predicts 'mini Ice Age'

UPI
February 7th, 2006

A Russian astronomer has predicted that Earth will experience a "mini Ice Age" in the middle of this century, caused by low solar activity.

Khabibullo Abdusamatov of the Pulkovo Astronomic Observatory in St. Petersburg said Monday that temperatures will begin falling six or seven years from now, when global warming caused by increased solar activity in the 20th century reaches its peak, RIA Novosti reported.

The coldest period will occur 15 to 20 years after a major solar output decline between 2035 and 2045, Abdusamatov said.

Dramatic changes in the earth's surface temperatures are an ordinary phenomenon, not an anomaly, he said, and result from variations in the sun's energy output and ultraviolet radiation.

The Northern Hemisphere's most recent cool-down period occurred between 1645 and 1705. The resulting period, known as the Little Ice Age, left canals in the Netherlands frozen solid and forced people in Greenland to abandon their houses to glaciers, the scientist said.

http://www.physorg.com/news10595.html

Mac-7 wrote:

Bill Maher is the idiot.
The climate is always changing from one Ice Age to another with warming periods in between.
But human-caused global warming is still unproven and actually losing support among scientists.

Earth on the Brink of an Ice Age

Front page / Science / Planet Earth
11.01.2009

The earth is now on the brink of entering another Ice Age, according to a large and compelling body of evidence from within the field of climate science. Many sources of data which provide our knowledge base of long-term climate change indicate that the warm, twelve thousand year-long Holocene period will rather soon be coming to an end, and then the earth will return to Ice Age conditions for the next 100,000 years.

Ice cores, ocean sediment cores, the geologic record, and studies of ancient plant and animal populations all demonstrate a regular cyclic pattern of Ice Age glacial maximums which each last about 100,000 years, separated by intervening warm interglacials, each lasting about 12,000 years...

In 1976 the prestigious journal “Science” published a landmark paper by John Imbrie, James Hays, and Nicholas Shackleton entitled “Variations in the Earth's orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages,” which described the correlation which the trio of scientist/authors had found between the climate data obtained from ocean sediment cores and the patterns of the astronomical Milankovich cycles.

Since the late 1970s, the Milankovich theory has remained the predominant theory to account for Ice Age causation among climate scientists, and hence the Milankovich theory is always described in textbooks of climatology and in encyclopaedia articles about the Ice Ages.

http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/106922...

That grunt is a fine one to talk about stupidity.

ObamaRules wrote:

Maher is 100% correct! These Conservative fools are so clueless that they would prefer to risk the future of humanity rather than heed scientific research!

Science & Technology

Russian scientist says Earth could soon face new Ice Age

14:3122/01/2008

ST. PETERSBURG, January 22 (RIA Novosti)- Temperatures on Earth have stabilized in the past decade, and the planet should brace itself for a new Ice Age rather than global warming, a Russian scientist said in an interview with RIA Novosti Tuesday.
"Russian and foreign research data confirm that global temperatures in 2007 were practically similar to those in 2006, and, in general, identical to 1998-2006 temperatures, which, basically, means that the Earth passed the peak of global warming in 1998-2005," said Khabibullo Abdusamatov, head of a space research lab at the Pulkovo observatory in St. Petersburg.

According to the scientist, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere has risen more than 4% in the past decade, but global warming has practically stopped. It confirms the theory of "solar" impact on changes in the Earth's climate, because the amount of solar energy reaching the planet has drastically decreased during the same period, the scientist said...

http://en.rian.ru/science/20080122/97519953.h...

ObamaRules wrote:

Maher is 100% correct! These Conservative fools are so clueless that they would prefer to risk the future of humanity rather than heed scientific research!

Russian Scientists Forecast Global Cooling

16 January 2009 14:20

Even before the Bolsheviks took over the Kerensky government and formed the Soviet Union, the main propaganda arm of Soviet Communism was the newspaper Pravda. It continued as the voice of the Communist Party throughout the history of the Soviet Union, though some contend it remains that voice today. The irony is in the name "Pravda," which in Russian means "truth." Yet virtually every pronouncement in Pravda was the exact opposite of the objective truth.

The Soviet dictators considered truth to be whatever promoted the welfare of the Communist Party, and that was almost always a falsehood of some dimension.

More ironic is that the reporting today of Pravda on the subject of global warming has less bias than its Western counterparts such as the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, AP — you name it in the U.S. media — when it comes to the subject of global warming. The major media in this country has hewed to the IPCC and Gore line that debate over anthropomorphic (human-caused) global warming (AGW), or the more fashionable phrase "climate change," is no longer debatable. It's over. Burning more fossil fuels will lead inevitably and shortly to the Earth overheating and to climate catastrophe.

As reported by Pravda, Russian scientists are ignoring the global-warming "consensus" that the American media claim exists. Russian scientists point out that the Earth has warm periods called "interglacials" of about 12,000 years in length between incomprehensibly long 100,000-year ice ages.

And guess how long it has been since the last ice age. That's right — about 12,000 years.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-mainmenu-3...