|
“Together for 24, legal for 5”
Since: Sep 07
Littleton, NH
|
Please wait...
I thought Weed promised to allow a vote, should it come up. She won't have much choice if the bill passes the House, the Governor supports, and there are enough votes to pass the Senate.
|
|
Cherry Blossom Lipstick
Easthampton, MA
|
|
|
“ WOOF !”
Since: Oct 10
Coolidge, AZ
|
Please wait...
btw, Rhode Island's offical name is the longest state name in the U.S., and about about 3 years ago, the Rhode Island General Assembly voted to allow the people of the state to vote and decide whether to change the name of the state.
Early polls showed the public favoring voting to change the name of the state, but ultimately the proposal was voted down overwhelmingly.
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Since: Nov 07
Tawas City, Michigan
|
Please wait...
Cherry Blossom Lipstick wrote: Voted down every time. Actually, if you bothered to read the story, the votes are obviously there to pass marriage equality in Rhode Island, but one person is standing in the way of all a vote to happen. Now go back to surfing the net for gay porn......
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Since: Nov 07
Tawas City, Michigan
|
Please wait...
nhjeff wrote: I thought Weed promised to allow a vote, should it come up. She won't have much choice if the bill passes the House, the Governor supports, and there are enough votes to pass the Senate. What they need to do is target Weeds and run a pro-equality candidate against her. Time for the rich gays in Newport to pony up the bucks and get rid of her.
|
|
“ WOOF !”
Since: Oct 10
Coolidge, AZ
|
Please wait...
WeTheSheeple wrote: <quoted text> Actually, if you bothered to read the story, the votes are obviously there to pass marriage equality in Rhode Island, but one person is standing in the way of all a vote to happen. Now go back to surfing the net for gay porn...... THAT'S democracy ! :)
|
|
“Together for 24, legal for 5”
Since: Sep 07
Littleton, NH
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
WeTheSheeple wrote: <quoted text> What they need to do is target Weeds and run a pro-equality candidate against her. Time for the rich gays in Newport to pony up the bucks and get rid of her. Well, I'm no expert on Rhode Island (and the Providence Plantations) civics, but doesn't the majority party get to choose the President of the Senate? Just replace her. I mean, how much power can she have over the legislature with a name like "Weed?"
|
|
“Together for 24, legal for 5”
Since: Sep 07
Littleton, NH
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
Cherry Blossom Lipstick wrote: Voted down every time. Rhode Island has no people's veto, so the legislature's decision is final. More importantly, we're talking about 2013 in a very small state surrounded by marriage equality. Pope Ratzy can stomp and stammer all he wants. I don't think the people are going to follow.
|
|
|
|
Brown Lipstick
Easthampton, MA
|
Judged:
1
WeTheSheeple wrote: <quoted text> Actually, if you bothered to read the story, the votes are obviously there to pass marriage equality in Rhode Island, but one person is standing in the way of all a vote to happen. Now go back to surfing the net for gay porn...... Skewed studies and polling. Again! Voted down every time and would be voted down here too.
|
|
Brown Lipstick
Easthampton, MA
|
Judged:
1
nhjeff wrote: <quoted text> Rhode Island has no people's veto, so the legislature's decision is final. More importantly, we're talking about 2013 in a very small state surrounded by marriage equality. Pope Ratzy can stomp and stammer all he wants. I don't think the people are going to follow. It is not in the states best interest until a vote is tallied my little homofascist Bolshevik commie you.
|
|
Brown Lipstick
Easthampton, MA
|
FaFoxy wrote: <quoted text> THAT'S democracy ! :) Perverted sexual behavior has nothing to do with democracy. This state here is NOT, I repeat NOT a democratic state.
|
|
“Together for 24, legal for 5”
Since: Sep 07
Littleton, NH
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
Brown Lipstick wrote: <quoted text> Skewed studies and polling. Again! Voted down every time and would be voted down here too. Let's see: The Connecticut legislature has voted for marriage equality. The Vermont legislature has voted for marriage equality. The New Hampshire legislature has voted for marriage equality. The Maine legislature has voted for marriage equality. The New York legislature has voted for marriage equality. The New Jersey legislature has voted for marriage equality. It's really not a big stretch to think that Rhode Island's legislature will also concur with marriage equality.
|
|
“Together for 24, legal for 5”
Since: Sep 07
Littleton, NH
|
Please wait...
Judged:
2
1
Brown Lipstick wrote: <quoted text> It is not in the states best interest until a vote is tallied my little homofascist Bolshevik commie you. It must suck to be you. You know nothing about me, and look at all those epithets you had to string together just to make yourself feel superior. Honey, you are not. Your opinion means sh-t in Massachusetts because you are sh-t.
|
|
“Together for 24, legal for 5”
Since: Sep 07
Littleton, NH
|
Please wait...
Judged:
2
1
Brown Lipstick wrote: <quoted text> Perverted sexual behavior has nothing to do with democracy. This state here is NOT, I repeat NOT a democratic state. Oh call a WAAAAAAAAAAMbulence! Sh-t-on-his-lips didn't get his waaaaay! WAAAAAAAAAA!!
|
|
Brown Lipstick
Easthampton, MA
|
Judged:
2
nhjeff wrote: <quoted text> Let's see: The Connecticut legislature has voted for marriage equality. The Vermont legislature has voted for marriage equality. The New Hampshire legislature has voted for marriage equality. The Maine legislature has voted for marriage equality. The New York legislature has voted for marriage equality. The New Jersey legislature has voted for marriage equality. It's really not a big stretch to think that Rhode Island's legislature will also concur with marriage equality. People........People.......... People..........People........ ..People.......People......... .People..........People....... ...People..........People..... .....People..........People.
|
|
Brown Lipstick
Easthampton, MA
|
nhjeff wrote: <quoted text> It must suck to be you. You know nothing about me, and look at all those epithets you had to string together just to make yourself feel superior. Honey, you are not. Your opinion means sh-t in Massachusetts because you are sh-t. Quite the opposite diaper boy. The seepage is worse from your mouth than is from your ass. If allowed for a vote it WOULD go down. Same for bltg parenting.
|
|
“Together for 24, legal for 5”
Since: Sep 07
Littleton, NH
|
Please wait...
Brown Lipstick wrote: <quoted text> People........People.......... People..........People........ ..People.......People......... .People..........People....... ...People..........People..... .....People..........People. Whether a plebiscite would pass or fail matters not. In Rhode Island, the legislature's decision is final. It still sucks to be you. Especially since you can't vote in Rhode Island.
|
|
hi hi
Philadelphia, PA
|
Judged:
2
1
Brown Lipstick wrote: <quoted text> Quite the opposite diaper boy. The seepage is worse from your mouth than is from your ass. If allowed for a vote it WOULD go down. Same for bltg parenting. Biggest mystery to me is why this is not being repeatedly attacked (not you; the POV) as misrepresentative of truth. In these 30+ state votes,*lies* are what led to the "ban." I'm amaaaazed that the pro-gay are not having a field day with this; but ... they never have. They *never* mention it, in fact. They let this "We've won in 32 states!" statistic pass EVERY. damn. time. It's the biggest mystery to me. It doesn't take much time or effort to explain that if you were taken before a court and *lied about*, that court would render a verdict *against you*. That's what has happened in over 30 states. When YOUR ILK PERSONALLY hate Obama and feel he should be jailed and this and that, and he *walks free*, you are laughable to complain. You want others to be punished, but you all want to get away with murder.
|
|
Brown Lipstick
Easthampton, MA
|
Judged:
1
1
hi hi wrote: <quoted text> Biggest mystery to me is why this is not being repeatedly attacked (not you; the POV) as misrepresentative of truth. In these 30+ state votes,*lies* are what led to the "ban." I'm amaaaazed that the pro-gay are not having a field day with this; but ... they never have. They *never* mention it, in fact. They let this "We've won in 32 states!" statistic pass EVERY. damn. time. It's the biggest mystery to me. It doesn't take much time or effort to explain that if you were taken before a court and *lied about*, that court would render a verdict *against you*. That's what has happened in over 30 states. When YOUR ILK PERSONALLY hate Obama and feel he should be jailed and this and that, and he *walks free*, you are laughable to complain. You want others to be punished, but you all want to get away with murder. My ilk!!! I'm not the homosexual trolling topix and making fun of others for being just like a homosexual.
|
|
Brown Lipstick
Easthampton, MA
|
nhjeff wrote: <quoted text> Whether a plebiscite would pass or fail matters not. In Rhode Island, the legislature's decision is final. It still sucks to be you. Especially since you can't vote in Rhode Island. My homofascist little bolshevik commie you.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|