Ordinance 2012-296 Jacksonville Florida upcoming vote

Aug 6, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Examiner.com

On June 4, 2012 there was a city council meeting that met in City Hall to introduce The Human Rights Ordinance 2012 - 296 , which would prohibit discrimination against individuals based on "self-choice sexual orientation" and "gender identity or expression." This coming Tuesday, August 7, 2012 ; at City Hall, 117 W. Duval St., Jacksonville City ... (more)

Comments
1 - 9 of 9 Comments Last updated Aug 10, 2012
Viker

Montgomery, AL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

This bill will do more harm than good. When did the government get the right to tell a private business owner who they can hire and fire? When did the government get the right to tell a private land owner who they can and cannot rent their property/sell goods to? If a private citizen wants to discriminate, that is their choice and they are constitutionally free to make it. It will put the LGBT community into a privileged class to where the rules will no longer apply to them they may do anything they want. If anyone calls them on it they can just claim discrimination and use the force of a lawsuit to get their way.

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Aug 9, 2012
 
Viker wrote:
This bill will do more harm than good. When did the government get the right to tell a private business owner who they can hire and fire? When did the government get the right to tell a private land owner who they can and cannot rent their property/sell goods to? If a private citizen wants to discriminate, that is their choice and they are constitutionally free to make it. It will put the LGBT community into a privileged class to where the rules will no longer apply to them they may do anything they want. If anyone calls them on it they can just claim discrimination and use the force of a lawsuit to get their way.
Are you willing to have race, sex, and religion removed then from the old language of the ordinance? If you are then I'd believe your argument wasn't directed towards just LGBT not being protected.

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Aug 9, 2012
 
Viker wrote:
This bill will do more harm than good. When did the government get the right to tell a private business owner who they can hire and fire? When did the government get the right to tell a private land owner who they can and cannot rent their property/sell goods to? If a private citizen wants to discriminate, that is their choice and they are constitutionally free to make it. It will put the LGBT community into a privileged class to where the rules will no longer apply to them they may do anything they want. If anyone calls them on it they can just claim discrimination and use the force of a lawsuit to get their way.
Couldn't your analogy also apply to blacks, whites, Christians, and Muslim being a protected class? What if someone fired someone because they are black or Christian or white? Is that okay too if that is what the private citizen wants to do? Why is it that no one complain about the human rights ordinance until they wanted sexual orientation and gender identity/expression included? Could it be that they want to fire people they disapprove of?
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Aug 9, 2012
 
Viker wrote:
This bill will do more harm than good. When did the government get the right to tell a private business owner who they can hire and fire?
Any day now
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Non-D...
Viker wrote:
When did the government get the right to tell a private land owner who they can and cannot rent their property/sell goods to?
1965
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_De...

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Aug 9, 2012
 
The article is VERY biased and one sided without any proof to back up their claims, scare tactics, stereotypes, and comparing gays/trans to pedophiles.

“Stop the liberal madness”

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Aug 9, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Viker wrote:
This bill will do more harm than good. When did the government get the right to tell a private business owner who they can hire and fire? When did the government get the right to tell a private land owner who they can and cannot rent their property/sell goods to? If a private citizen wants to discriminate, that is their choice and they are constitutionally free to make it. It will put the LGBT community into a privileged class to where the rules will no longer apply to them they may do anything they want. If anyone calls them on it they can just claim discrimination and use the force of a lawsuit to get their way.
The Dems want to force business to not only hire gays but to promote only gays .

This is one of their many attacks on religion.

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Aug 9, 2012
 
luv Sarah Palin wrote:
<quoted text>
The Dems want to force business to not only hire gays but to promote only gays .
This is one of their many attacks on religion.
YOUR Sarah backed Sarah Steelman(R) here in MO. But Steelman came in 3rd place in the primaries. Now THAT, was an attack on the state here.=)
equalityboy81

Yulee, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Aug 9, 2012
 
luv Sarah Palin wrote:
<quoted text>
The Dems want to force business to not only hire gays but to promote only gays .
This is one of their many attacks on religion.
What if someone doesn't want to hire a Christian? Do they have that right? Should they in your opinion? They don't have the right to fire someone because of their religion according to the law. Why do Christians get special rights?

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Aug 10, 2012
 
equalityboy81 wrote:
<quoted text>
Couldn't your analogy also apply to blacks, whites, Christians, and Muslim being a protected class? What if someone fired someone because they are black or Christian or white? Is that okay too if that is what the private citizen wants to do? Why is it that no one complain about the human rights ordinance until they wanted sexual orientation and gender identity/expression included? Could it be that they want to fire people they disapprove of?
I agree.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

32 Users are viewing the Gay/Lesbian Forum right now

Search the Gay/Lesbian Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
What Color Panties Is Jade Wearing? 20 min 1 THE Mayor 1 2
Gay couple have day in church 41 min The Troll Stopper 54
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 56 min The Troll Stopper 54,633
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr Yahoo 49,229
Uganda's Anti-Gay Law Masks The Real Scandal - ... 1 hr Rainbow Kid 4
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 2 hr Los Angeles 200,551
Supreme Court: Was gay marriage settled in 1972... 3 hr Frankie Rizzo 116
Texas: Gay-marriage ban best for children 3 hr Frankie Rizzo 733
Losing Streak Lengthens for Foes of Gay Marriage 4 hr Frankie Rizzo 3,936
Smithsonian adds LGBT history to museum collection 9 hr juls 9
•••
•••