|
“In God We Trust”
Since: Jul 12
Done diddly do done did
|
Please wait...
RnL2008 wrote: <quoted text> Being Gay, Lesbian or straight is as much about who a person is as their gender is......WHO THEY HAVE SEX WITH, is what they do. If I NEVER had sex again with a woman, I'd still be a Lesbian......just a celibate Lesbian......but a Lesbian nevertheless!!! Fine, but a lesbian by CHOICE.
|
|
“In God We Trust”
Since: Jul 12
Done diddly do done did
|
Please wait...
Catholic created gay wrote: <quoted text> Even hetero sex isn't logical so why bother trying to figure it out logically. A doctor once told me "all sex is disgusting" and he was strait. How are you Catholic AND gay...? Leviticus 18:22 - Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable. Leviticus 20:13 -If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. Do you just ignore these parts of the Bible??
|
|
“In God We Trust”
Since: Jul 12
Done diddly do done did
|
Please wait...
woodtick57 wrote: <quoted text>if you think your gender preference is a choice, then you are saying you are attracted to both sexes, but CHOSE to be with women. Of course, you didn't choose which gender you are attracted to, did you? why do you others do? "gender preference is a choice" ????? What?!? You think I said that can CHOOSE genders??? No, I said gays CHOOSE to be gay.
|
|
“In God We Trust”
Since: Jul 12
Done diddly do done did
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
You Kids Get Off My Lawn wrote: <quoted text> Well now hold on a minute pard! I would have to say that the jurys still out on that question! LOL,Myself,Clint Eastwood have come out on record and have stated that I just can't see what the big fuss is about marriage equality! I mean NO big deal,let gays marry as it harms no one and does not affect anyone's marriage! Besides the 14th amendment of our Constitution backs me up! While the 14th amendment protects your life, liberty & happiness, it still doesn't recognize gay marriage, as gay marriage is an abomination.
|
|
“In God We Trust”
Since: Jul 12
Done diddly do done did
|
Please wait...
Drew Smith wrote: <quoted text> What you are missing is that I didn't choose my preference. Neither did you. Therefore, being gay or straight is about who a person is, not about what they choose to do about it. Did you choose your preference? You decided to prefer women but you could have decided the other way? Then why do so many people date or marry heterosexually then "come out", proclaiming that they were "bron gay"?? VERY FEW gays are always gay, that's my point. A "gay" man can't be married to a woman, can't have sex with her, can't father children with her... HE's GAY, right? Why is a gay man, "attracted to the same sex", screwing & marrying a woman???
|
|
“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”
Since: Sep 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
WMCOL wrote: <quoted text> ========== Speaking of "ignorant" you take the prize. Abnormal and unnatural in HUMANS. Guess you missed that, and it does not matter that heterosexuals air out their rears too, it is still unnatural and abnormal in HUMANS just as stated. Look brains, by your own figures anal sex is abnormal. "34% to 38%" is not a norm. You prove my point. You could even add those figures to the entire homosexual population and it would still not be a norm for the general population of HUMANS. Abnormal and unnatural ONLY in humans eh? That is your opinion, not a scientific fact. And a "norm" is generally something determined based on a social population, not biology. We are mammals.. a type of animal. Our sexuality is mostly instinct like every other animal on the planet. The fact that homosexuality and/or anal sex (whether participants are gay or straight) are a constant variation in nature gives cause to assume that it IS, in fact, natural. Natural meaning "occurring in nature." Nature and social norms really have nothing to do with each other. I am in no way defending anal sex, I think it's gross too, not to mention probably painful. But I would never tell another person that their consentual sexuality is wrong simply because I don't do it. THAT is wrong, and none of my business. I also think blow jobs are gross but just because I feel that way doesn't make it wrong for other people to do it. And I might point out also, that oral sex does not produce offspring, involves mouth contact with an organ that expels human waste, and not everyone does it or likes it. So should we call that abnormal, unnatural and argue about that too? Oh wait, you probably LIKE oral sex, so no arguments there. Hypocrite.
|
|
“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”
Since: Sep 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
WMCOL wrote: <quoted text> ========== Only if homosexuals are not human. That doesn't even make sense. By definition, a human homosexual would naturally seek companionship with someone of the same sex. Read a book, would ya??
|
|
“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”
Since: Sep 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mr right ness wrote: <quoted text> Lying sack of shit. Did you hear? When Obama is kicked out in NOv. him and Michelle are moving to Utah and marrying larry sinclair! What the hell does the president have to do with this? Besides which, if Obama does lose, I hope you like living in a Mormon police state run by a man who beleives he WILL become a god, and paying $2000 or more in taxes every year. OBAMA 2012!
|
|
|
|
“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”
Since: Sep 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mr right ness wrote: <quoted text> Lying, disgusting sack of shit homo, I've slept with 80 + women and not one enjoyed anal sex. And you know that because you tried and they didn't let you, right? LOL BTW, my marrying my same sex partner is certainly not going to change America's moral fabric or spread "gay" diseases. People like you poking your dip stick into anything with a set of boobs is to blame for that! Yeah, that's SO much better for society, Christianity and morality than a monogomous, loving, FOREVER gay union.
|
|
“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”
Since: Sep 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
mr right ness wrote: <quoted text> well, i am rather large.lol When you look at it through a microscope.
|
|
“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”
Since: Sep 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mr right ness wrote: <quoted text> You're a lying sack of shit, your sites are worthless, like everything you say. Just because you like it up the ass doesn't mean females do. Just because the women you have been with didn't like it doesn't mean you don't try to come in the back door every chance you get. You boys like it tight, right? How do you make a loose woman tight? Yeah.... you guessed it! You can ignore research and facts all you want. If you can't credit a credible source, it just makes you narrow minded and naive. Just because you think the Earth is flat, doesn't make it any less round.
|
|
“Marriage equality for all”
Since: Jul 07
Illinois
|
Please wait...
RiversideRedneck wrote: <quoted text> "gender preference is a choice" ????? What?!? You think I said that can CHOOSE genders??? No, I said gays CHOOSE to be gay. Prove it. Go ahead, behotch, prove that it is a choice or shut the he'll up.
|
|
“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”
Since: Sep 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Ken wrote: <quoted text> 31 states have voted it down...some very recently. No judge can ever change my personal belief...nor a mayor of Chicago or Boston. That would mean all but maybe one state have voted on it? Ummm... not true. Check your facts. And your location says you're in Canada.... where same sex couples are allowed to get married. That's AWESOME, good for you!
|
|
“ TRUTH : NOT EXPEDIENCE”
Since: Nov 07
town near Jax, Fl
|
Please wait...
RiversideRedneck wrote: <quoted text> How are you Catholic AND gay...? Leviticus 18:22 - Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable. Leviticus 20:13 -If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. Do you just ignore these parts of the Bible?? God creates gay people, that's a fact. So, you don't understand, there is a lot about God I don't understand also but that doesn't mean it isn't true. If I never have sex with anybody I'd still be gay because it wasn't up to me. I don't agree with the Catholic position on gays because it is expedient (look it up).
|
|
“ TRUTH : NOT EXPEDIENCE”
Since: Nov 07
town near Jax, Fl
|
Please wait...
RiversideRedneck wrote: <quoted text> How are you Catholic AND gay...? Leviticus 18:22 - Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable. Leviticus 20:13 -If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. Do you just ignore these parts of the Bible?? Anyone who takes the Bible literally is a fool. A priest once said that. He was right.
|
|
“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”
Since: Sep 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Pietro Armando wrote: <quoted text> Oh there were many reasons, that I get. How does one explain it today? Are there gays and lesbians who still choose to marry, opposite sex, that is? Even though both partners are aware, and its no secret? Actually.. yes. I know a few "couples"... Gay men married to straight women and it's all out in the open. They married their best friend for spousal benefits. They date other people. Ahhh.. the sanctity of man-woman marriage, eh?? Besides situations like that, what straight woman would marry a gay man knowing her's gay???? Or vice versa? I'm sure in those situations it's a big secret. The whole idea is to stay in the closet and not let ANYONE know. duh!
|
|
“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”
Since: Sep 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
WMCOL wrote: <quoted text> ========== Blond, unlike the unnatural and abnormal homosexuality acts, is not a behavior. Homoxexuals try to put "nature behind" but no matter how they put it behind, in the behind is unnatural. Good lord! It's not a behavior, it's a characteristic. Left handedess is a behavior. Vegetarianism is a behavior. Riding a freaking moped is a behavior. The majority of the population doesn't do any of those things, so are they unnatural and abnormal too?
|
|
“Marriage equality for all”
Since: Jul 07
Illinois
|
Please wait...
RiversideRedneck wrote: <quoted text> Then why do so many people date or marry heterosexually then "come out", proclaiming that they were "bron gay"?? VERY FEW gays are always gay, that's my point. A "gay" man can't be married to a woman, can't have sex with her, can't father children with her... HE's GAY, right? Why is a gay man, "attracted to the same sex", screwing & marrying a woman??? Societal pressure Family pressure Religious pressure They were naive and thought the right woman could help solve everything Any combination of the above. As being gay becomes more acceptable, young people won't feel the pressure to conform. Why are you douchebag?
|
|
“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”
Since: Sep 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
WMCOL wrote: If gay people want to be seen as normal they need to give up homosexual behavior. It is totally absurd to practice abnormal and unnatural behavior and then want it to be seen as normal and natural. You are what you are, or what you give the perception that you are. Denying who you are means you gays have not accepted who you are, but yet you want society to accept your behavior. Honest kwirs admit that how they behave sexually is abnormal and unnatural, and they are to be commended for their honesty. And how many of those have you met? My guess is 0.
|
|
Since: Jul 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
RatherBeInMissouri wrote: <quoted text> Abnormal and unnatural ONLY in humans eh? That is your opinion, not a scientific fact. And a "norm" is generally something determined based on a social population, not biology. We are mammals.. a type of animal. Our sexuality is mostly instinct like every other animal on the planet. The fact that homosexuality and/or anal sex (whether participants are gay or straight) are a constant variation in nature gives cause to assume that it IS, in fact, natural. Natural meaning "occurring in nature." Nature and social norms really have nothing to do with each other. I am in no way defending anal sex, I think it's gross too, not to mention probably painful. But I would never tell another person that their consentual sexuality is wrong simply because I don't do it. THAT is wrong, and none of my business. I also think blow jobs are gross but just because I feel that way doesn't make it wrong for other people to do it. And I might point out also, that oral sex does not produce offspring, involves mouth contact with an organ that expels human waste, and not everyone does it or likes it. So should we call that abnormal, unnatural and argue about that too? Oh wait, you probably LIKE oral sex, so no arguments there. Hypocrite. ========== "occurring in nature" in humans is vagina and penis and reproduction. That is the prominent theme and what is natural and what is normal and meant to be in nature. Anything opposite that hook-up in nature is anti-natural design and abnormal. Gays don't use nature the way it is designed to be used so they are acting unnatural, against nature, abomination. Furthermore, using nature the way gays do, forever thwarts natural design. Doesn't take a genius or reading a book to relize how nature has designed the various body parts for specific purposes, and man with man or woman with woman is not part of that natural design.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|