Obama Announces Full Support for Gay Marriage

Judged:

5

5

5

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>But you're slinging pigshit before intellects...

Judged:

5

5

5

StellarKnight wrote:

<quoted text>
your not even close to being intellectual...you get slammed in every thread you post in ...
if you could really think you would never type again without it.

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
People didn't vote on a "right" they voted to clarify a right. "Gay" people already possess the civil right to marry. Simply because some of them do not wish to marry the type of people to who the law says they can, does not meant they cannot marry in the first place.

Judged:

5

5

5

StellarKnight wrote:

woodtick said.." Stellar doesn't care about whose feelings he hurts."
Really wooden schtick? Only half right. I don't care WHO you are.

Judged:

4

4

4

Drew Smith wrote:

Do you think that it's acceptable for laws to discriminate on the basis of gender?
<quoted text>
Because?

Judged:

4

4

4

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Really? please post these examples of where i "got slammed". It should be funny to watch you weasle out of this one...

Judged:

5

5

5

Bringmedinner wrote:

Gays have made people anti-gay.

Bringmedinner wrote:

Being anti-gay is not pleasant; when fighting the depraved, one sometimes get dirty.

Bringmedinner wrote:

This doesn't make the fight less worthwhile.

Bringmedinner wrote:

Homosexual behavior and propaganda should once again be illegal.

Bringmedinner wrote:

All it renders in society is more drugs, more disease and more distemper.

Bringmedinner wrote:

One cannot deny the disgusting history of activist gays worldwide.

Judged:

4

4

4

Horatio Caine wrote:

I believe the sources we are quoting are governments sources but you know that.

Horatio Caine wrote:

If what you were saying was true that means the CDC, FDA, FBI, D.O.J., Multiple state health departments. multiple universities and at least 6 other countries governments are all lying on Gays. We know whose lying don''t we?

Horatio Caine wrote:

This technique just doesn't work anymore! You would have better luck calling people homophobes and bigots!
Here the CDC link you so readily deny:
For more information visit the CDC website here.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/HIVIncide ...
<quoted text>

Judged:

4

4

4

Horatio Caine wrote:

Here is the FDA link:
``
FDA: Gay Men Still Banned from Donating Blood Over Documented Risk Concerns
``
WASHINGTON, D.C.,– Despite attempts by pro-homosexual advocates to paint the homosexual lifestyle as just another, normal, and healthy lifestyle choice, the FDA has renewed its 1983 policy that gay men cannot donate blood, due to the high-risk nature of living an active homosexual lifestyle.
This past Wednesday the FDA stated that, despite mounting opposition to the policy, it will for medical reasons continue to uphold its ban on men who live or who have lived an active homosexual life from donating blood.
According to the FDA, the ban is in place because,“A history of male-to-male sex is associated with an increased risk for the presence of and transmission of certain infectious diseases, including HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.”
The FDA policy relating to homosexual men is unique in its severity. While there is a lengthy list of criteria by which a potential donor may be deferred from donating blood (such as visiting particular African countries), such bans usually expire after a certain period of time. The ban on homosexual men, however, applies to any man who has ever had sex with another man, even once, subsequent to 1977.
The Administration, however, argues that the strictness of the ban is justified, pointing out that the “policy is intended to protect all people who receive blood transfusions from an increased risk of exposure to potentially infected blood and blood products.”
Some, however, are arguing that the FDA’s policy is discriminatory against homosexual men. Arthur Caplan, in an editorial for NBC6 argues that new testing technologies alleviate any fear that patients may contract AIDS by receiving a tainted transfusion.“At one time, long ago, the gay-blood ban may have made sense. But it no longer does,” he said.
“If a man has sex with a high risk woman, he’s allowed back into the donation pool after 12 months,” complained Joel Ginsberg, the executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.“If he has safe sex with another man, he’s banned for life.”
Recognizing that the area of homosexuality is a controversial realm, however, with pro-homosexual activists on the watch for any signs of discrimination, the FDA responded to accusations of discrimination in its updated official policy in the matter. The “deferral policy is based on the documented increased risk of certain transfusion transmissible infections, such as HIV, associated with male-to-male sex and is not based on any judgment concerning the donor’s sexual orientation,” reads the FDA’s policy.
“Surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that men who have sex with men and would be likely to donate have a HIV prevalence that is at present over 15 fold higher than the general population, and over 2000 fold higher than current repeat blood donors (i.e., those who have been negatively screened and tested) in the USA.”
Dr. Robertson Davenport, who is an associate professor of pathology at the University of Michigan Hospital, agrees with the decision of the FDA.“The data are clear that men who engage in sexual contact with other men, as a whole, have a significantly higher risk of HIV,” he said.“Given our testing is not perfect, we will increase the risk to patients.”
A number of European countries have similar bans pertaining to homosexual man. Canada also forbids homosexual men from donating blood, due to similar concerns.
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Blo...

Judged:

4

4

4

Horatio Caine wrote:

Here is the FDA link:
``
FDA: Gay Men Still Banned from Donating Blood Over Documented Risk Concerns
``
WASHINGTON, D.C.,– Despite attempts by pro-homosexual advocates to paint the homosexual lifestyle as just another, normal, and healthy lifestyle choice, the FDA has renewed its 1983 policy that gay men cannot donate blood, due to the high-risk nature of living an active homosexual lifestyle.

Judged:

6

5

5

hi hi wrote:

<quoted text>
Jews made people anti-semitic? Jews prompted Hitler's activities? Blacks made people racist? Blacks prompted slavery?
It's like you have a sickness that makes you into a puppet of hatred.
<quoted text>
Here's your problem: "fighting the depraved." Nothing in your power will change that they're not depraved; moreover, YOU LYING ABOUT IT EVERY SINGLE DAY makes you look so dishonorable and so hateful -- so *NOT* moral and so *NOT* virtuous, in fact -- that no one sensible can be troubled to listen to your sickness.
<quoted text>
It's really not winnable. You cannot *change who they are*; anyone sensible can point to someone like you as the SOURCE of the hatred and the problems. Your claim otherwise is fooling no one except people *exactly like you*, who are invested in the same hatred.
<quoted text>
Everything about your post LEGITIMIZES the behavior of pro-gay people when they attack someone like you, denounce you, and even call you names. ALL you have done in this post, like a sick and unrepentant rapist, is call them names and decree that they should have absolutely no rights.
<quoted text>
You sound like racists of the 1800s who actually believed black people were subhuman. You also sound like walking, talking filth.
<quoted text>
I am denying it here and now, because I just read a post from someone who sounds like CHARLES MANSON, but I'm supposed to believe you are "moral." This is beyond a laugh; it's cause to label you a danger to society.

Judged:

6

5

5

WasteWater wrote:

<quoted text>
It's just a bunch of BS. I scroll right past it.

Judged:

6

5

5

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh Brother.....another idiot who believes that somehow a Gay man(who isn't attracted to women)would actually decide to marry a woman just because he wanted to be married........WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH JUST ALLOWING A GAY MAN TO MARRY THE GAY MAN OF HIS CHOOSING? or ALLOWING A LESBIAN TO MARRY THE LESBIAN WOMAN OF HER CHOOSING? I mean didn't you get to marry the person of your choosing? or did someone FORCE you to marry just anyone because they happen to be of the opposite-sex?

Judged:

6

5

5

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Bringmedinner just makes shit up as he goes. he is not to be taken seriously. obviously no-one in his life does for him to invent this fantasy world of his.
you should read some of the doosies he has posted on other pages. a true whack-job in the flesh...

Judged:

4

4

4

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Bringmedinner just makes shit up as he goes. he is not to be taken seriously. obviously no-one in his life does for him to invent this fantasy world of his.
you should read some of the doosies he has posted on other pages. a true whack-job in the flesh...

Judged:

6

5

5

Bill Of Rights wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny huh Rose! That would be like saying,if the shoe was on the other foot that I as a heterosexual could marry anyone I wanted as long as they were gay! LOL,The sheer idiocy of his statement is ludicrous at best! Marriage equality poses NO harm to the institution of marriage nor does it change it one iota! All marriage equality does is to make it all inclusive of ALL Americans gay or straight!

Judged:

7

7

7

hi hi wrote:

<quoted text>
I am just beginning to believe they're all sociopathic. To differing degrees, of course. You need a *REASON* to hate; and not a group, but individuals. Perhaps a guy "stole" your wife, or killed your kid. But this is straight-up insanity, and only this week am I beginning to fear *MUCH* more than before that somehow it will escalate into violence. The antigay are, I believe, a prominent, clear and present danger to society.