|
“Together for 24, legal for 5”
Since: Sep 07
Littleton, NH
|
Please wait...
There is nothing wrong with publishing public records. Anyone could have asked the Secretary of State for the information. Making relevant information more-readily available to their readers is good journalism.
|
|
“ WOOF !”
Since: Oct 10
Coolidge, AZ
|
Please wait...
nhjeff wrote: There is nothing wrong with publishing public records. Anyone could have asked the Secretary of State for the information. Making relevant information more-readily available to their readers is good journalism. I agree !
|
|
WoW
Pekin, IL
|
There is no rational case for the failed philosophy of homosexual 'marriage,' so attacking others is the only option open. In California, such publications resulted in horrible attacks, including the murder of a Mormon bishop by a radical homosexual fanatic. It left several young children with no father. Homosexual 'marriage' has been overwhelmingly rejected as an actual practice in every country that allows it. It really is all about HATE.
|
|
Since: May 12
Livonia, MI
|
Please wait...
WoW wrote: There is no rational case for the failed philosophy of homosexual 'marriage,' so attacking others is the only option open.
In California, such publications resulted in horrible attacks, including the murder of a Mormon bishop by a radical homosexual fanatic. It left several young children with no father.
Homosexual 'marriage' has been overwhelmingly rejected as an actual practice in every country that allows it. It really is all about HATE. If you say so.
|
|
“ WOOF !”
Since: Oct 10
Coolidge, AZ
|
Please wait...
WoW wrote: There is no rational case for the failed philosophy of homosexual 'marriage,' so attacking others is the only option open.
In California, such publications resulted in horrible attacks, including the murder of a Mormon bishop by a radical homosexual fanatic. It left several young children with no father.
Homosexual 'marriage' has been overwhelmingly rejected as an actual practice in every country that allows it. It really is all about HATE. With one exception being New York, where the state legislature passed, and the governor signed into law, a gay marriage bill. :)
|
|
Mister man
Longview, TX
|
There isn't any wrong with the list being published. You be be accountable for your actions.
|
|
Mister man
Longview, TX
|
WoW wrote: There is no rational case for the failed philosophy of homosexual 'marriage,' so attacking others is the only option open.
In California, such publications resulted in horrible attacks, including the murder of a Mormon bishop by a radical homosexual fanatic. It left several young children with no father.
Homosexual 'marriage' has been overwhelmingly rejected as an actual practice in every country that allows it. It really is all about HATE. A RADiCAL homosexual fanatic..... U need to push the off button on your tv... Why is it such a big deal for someone to get married. Who really cares... The only one is the tax man.....
|
|
“We are all atheists”
Since: May 11
Rehoboth Beach, DE
|
Please wait...
Look what these ignoramuses say: "Many of these people may be in favor of civil unions or ways of equalizing tax laws, but are opposed to changing the definition of marriage as it has existed forever." "Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. And that is what God’s says. Do these people think they are better than God?" Such arrogance. Such pride. Such ignorance. "...as it has existed forever"??? Please. "...that is what god says"??? Please.
|
|
|
|
“Together for 24, legal for 5”
Since: Sep 07
Littleton, NH
|
Please wait...
QWERTY, those sentiments would carry more weight if the people opposing SSM were aactually supporting state and federal recognition of civil whatchamcallits. But they aren't. In fact, they do everything they can to oppose any tolerance--much less acknowledgement--of gay relationships.
|
|
“I beleave in reason not god”
Since: Jun 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
WoW wrote: There is no rational case for the failed philosophy of homosexual 'marriage,' so attacking others is the only option open.
In California, such publications resulted in horrible attacks, including the murder of a Mormon bishop by a radical homosexual fanatic. It left several young children with no father.
Homosexual 'marriage' has been overwhelmingly rejected as an actual practice in every country that allows it. It really is all about HATE. L live in California. and that diffidently did happen. I actually support transparent icy. but if you are against ssm you might not want to let the gay community know because they will give you a hard time.
|
|
“I beleave in reason not god”
Since: Jun 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
qwerty26 wrote: Look what these ignoramuses say:
"Many of these people may be in favor of civil unions or ways of equalizing tax laws, but are opposed to changing the definition of marriage as it has existed forever."
"Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. And that is what God’s says. Do these people think they are better than God?"
Such arrogance. Such pride. Such ignorance. "...as it has existed forever"??? Please. "...that is what god says"??? Please. leave God out of it do you want to discard something that has worked for millenniums for something that has no history.
|
|
“We are all atheists”
Since: May 11
Rehoboth Beach, DE
|
Please wait...
freethinker1957 wrote: <quoted text>
leave God out of it do you want to discard something that has worked for millenniums for something that has no history. I'm not clear from whence you are coming. Are you saying that what is being called "traditional marriage" has been around forever? Because it's a relatively new thing, and hardly traditional. Not even clearly stated in the holy text of the christianists who so claim. It doesn't take much looking to find out what true, historical, "traditional" marriage consisted of... biblical marriage, for instance, would be more clearly defined as one man, many wives.
|
|
Since: Mar 09
Look
|
Please wait...
WoW wrote: There is no rational case for the failed philosophy of homosexual 'marriage,' so attacking others is the only option open.
In California, such publications resulted in horrible attacks, including the murder of a Mormon bishop by a radical homosexual fanatic. It left several young children with no father.
Homosexual 'marriage' has been overwhelmingly rejected as an actual practice in every country that allows it. It really is all about HATE. Better provide credible links to those assertions, boyo.
|
|
“ WOOF !”
Since: Oct 10
Coolidge, AZ
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
snyper wrote: <quoted text>
Better provide credible links to those assertions, boyo. You're as bad as he is. Why do you even respond to that nut ?! You only encourage him by doing so. And Topix users should demand that the owners put an "IGNORE" button on the site, like AOL has had for years.
|
|
Since: Jan 08
Chon Buri, Thailand
|
Please wait...
Knowing that your name would be published as "anti-gay" might not stop vitriolic homophobes from signing anti-gay petitions, etc, but it might stop the casual "why not" signer. Hope they publish the lists in all such states.(It would also be interesting to see how many of those signatures were really valid!)
|
|
Since: Mar 09
Look
|
Please wait...
FaFoxy wrote: <quoted text>
You're as bad as he is. Why do you even respond to that nut ?! You only encourage him by doing so.
And Topix users should demand that the owners put an "IGNORE" button on the site, like AOL has had for years. I reply to YOU, don't I ? I'm just being consistent.
|
|
Since: Dec 08
Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Please wait...
Mister man wrote: There isn't any wrong with the list being published. You be be accountable for your actions. Don't bother to respond rationally to anyone posting a location of Pekin, Ill unless you can convince the moron to jump in the lake.
|
|
david traversa
Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
Good.. their stupidity will be there for their children (and posterity) to see..
|
|
“I beleave in reason not god”
Since: Jun 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
qwerty26 wrote: <quoted text>
I'm not clear from whence you are coming. Are you saying that what is being called "traditional marriage" has been around forever? Because it's a relatively new thing, and hardly traditional. Not even clearly stated in the holy text of the christianists who so claim. It doesn't take much looking to find out what true, historical, "traditional" marriage consisted of... biblical marriage, for instance, would be more clearly defined as one man, many wives. It has always been Man and woman the propose of marriage is for children . Even where pollygamy was allowed 1 man 1woman was the norm
|
|
“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”
Since: Sep 10
Palm Springs, California
|
Please wait...
WoW wrote: There is no rational case for the failed philosophy of homosexual 'marriage,' so attacking others is the only option open.
In California, such publications resulted in horrible attacks, including the murder of a Mormon bishop by a radical homosexual fanatic. It left several young children with no father.
Homosexual 'marriage' has been overwhelmingly rejected as an actual practice in every country that allows it. It really is all about HATE. There's no rational case for using false names, DAVID MOORE of S. 18th Street, Pekin, Illinois.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|
Aquarius
