North Carolina voters approve gay marriage ban

May 8, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: NJ.com

North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment today defining marriage solely as a union between a man and a woman, making it the 30th state to adopt such a ban.

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of5,908
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Albert

Pekin, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

18

18

13

Congratulations, North Carolina! You've joined a large and growing majority of states with constitutional amendments preventing citizens from being disenfranchised on the legal definition of marriage!

Homosexual 'marriage' is a cruel lie with no real basis in how homosexual live!

No significant percent of the homosexual population has 'married' in ANY country that allows it, and studies have shown that few such 'marriages' are even exclusive relationships.

The homosexual 'marriage' movement is a hate based political charade attacking what others hold sacred.

No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No economically or physically unequal genders are involve. No child is ever born as a direct result, and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Having both is one of the most accurate statistical predictions of a child's future success in life.

Homosexual themselves overwhelmingly reject 'marriage' as an actual practice in EVERY country that allows the concocted oxymoron.

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

^
Albert copypastes this carp all the time. Ignore the homophobic bigot.
Bob

Livonia, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

5

Albert wrote:
Congratulations, North Carolina! You've joined a large and growing majority of states with constitutional amendments preventing citizens from being disenfranchised on the legal definition of marriage!
Homosexual 'marriage' is a cruel lie with no real basis in how homosexual live!
No significant percent of the homosexual population has 'married' in ANY country that allows it, and studies have shown that few such 'marriages' are even exclusive relationships.
The homosexual 'marriage' movement is a hate based political charade attacking what others hold sacred.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No economically or physically unequal genders are involve. No child is ever born as a direct result, and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Having both is one of the most accurate statistical predictions of a child's future success in life.
Homosexual themselves overwhelmingly reject 'marriage' as an actual practice in EVERY country that allows the concocted oxymoron.
You're right Albert. I am tired of all this bigotry. I am going to just marry a female friend of mine. I, as her legal husband, will apply for her benefits. I will never sleep with her, so kids won't be a problem. I will never live with her, so property won't be an issue. I will live with my boyfriend (I call him husband, so fuck you), and I will sleep with him, and I will use any and all benefits that I get from being legally married, I will share with my husband. Life will be a bit complicated, but I will have benefits and if my wife happens to pass before me, my husband and I will enjoy her survivor benefits.
Truth

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

4

Liberty and justice for all? Guess not.

“ WOOF !”

Since: Oct 10

Coolidge, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

4

This amendment means nothing. Gay marriage was already illegal in North Carolina. But this is akin to the laws that prevented, nor recognized interracial marriages half a century ago.

SCOTUS will rule these types of state constitutional amendments, and states laws unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment and the full faith and credit clause.

This vote means nothing except to show how backwards and prejudiced so many people in the South are.

“Super Freak”

Since: May 12

Brewster, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

10

9

6

There is no sanctity in heterosexual marriage. God loves Gay marriage.

North Carolinians are rubes.

“ WOOF !”

Since: Oct 10

Coolidge, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

CinnamonBoy wrote:
There is no sanctity in heterosexual marriage. God loves Gay marriage.
North Carolinians are rubes.
But their state constitution GUARNTEES 6 new tires for each of their homes.

:)
And teh only shoe store in the state went out of business for lack of customers.

Since: Jul 09

Indy/Philly/Toronto

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

4

As if North Carolina is actually an important state.
Who cares?
Let them wallow in their own ignorance.

“ WOOF !”

Since: Oct 10

Coolidge, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

mark in Toronto wrote:
As if North Carolina is actually an important state.
Who cares?
Let them wallow in their own ignorance.
Why in GOD'S NAME would somebody in Toronto CARE about what goes on in North Carolina ?!
ProfessorofEduca tion

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

6

5

3

Albert wrote:
Congratulations, North Carolina! You've joined a large and growing majority of states with constitutional amendments preventing citizens from being disenfranchised on the legal definition of marriage!
Homosexual 'marriage' is a cruel lie with no real basis in how homosexual live!
No significant percent of the homosexual population has 'married' in ANY country that allows it, and studies have shown that few such 'marriages' are even exclusive relationships.
The homosexual 'marriage' movement is a hate based political charade attacking what others hold sacred.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No economically or physically unequal genders are involve. No child is ever born as a direct result, and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Having both is one of the most accurate statistical predictions of a child's future success in life.
Homosexual themselves overwhelmingly reject 'marriage' as an actual practice in EVERY country that allows the concocted oxymoron.
Well and eloquently said, sir!
Have you ever noticed the intolerance and downright hate that those on the Left, supposed colleagues, demonstrate towards those expressing opposing views on matters so trivial as Democrat-homosexual-politics?
The "liberals" have turned the universities into scorched-earth wastelands where one must learn the intricacies of the myriad bureaucracies to succeed.
Democrats and all who associate with them are merely worthy of ridicule.
ProfessorofEduca tion

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

8

5

4

The headline of the article is also Pravda-like pro-homosexualist-Democrat propaganda/spin.
What actually happened is that the voters of North Carolina put the political peccadilos of liberal judges outside the reach of the Constitution of the State of North Carolina.

Well done, Tarheels!!!
The voice of the voters will be heard, or else.
Just ask Dick Lugar of Indiana, supposed lifetime Republican US Senator who got primaried out of his seat by an actual conservative.
The TEA Party is far from over.
Except for Chapel Hills, I love North Carolina!
Well done!
Pat Robertson s Fatwass

Pottstown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

3

ProfessorofEducation wrote:
<quoted text>Have you ever noticed the intolerance and downright hate that those on the Left, supposed colleagues, demonstrate towards those expressing opposing views....Democrats and all who associate with them are merely worthy of ridicule.
No, the other moron didn't notice, because he also was too busy listening to drug addict, Rush L., spew venom all day.

Hey evilgelical nutcase, if we had laws saying talibangelical scumbuckets couldn't marry, adopt, serve openly, teach, be protected from arbitrary firing you freeeks wouldn't be characterizing such bigotry as "opposing views."

We know who the bigots are, and they're going the way of the KKK - to the farthest margins of polite society.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Albert wrote:
blah blah blah, babble babble babble, yack yack yack, usual mindless drivel and tedious bible cut and pastes.
Oh, GARTH, DAVID MOORE from PEKIN, ILLINOIS. When will your lies END? How long will you lie and lie and lie?

Just ADMIT you are ONE person using dozens of names and we can talk. If you just lie and lie and lie NO one will read your drivel and no one will listen to you. But, if you are INCAPABLE of telling the truth, like the little pathological liar you have become, then just admit that to us, will you?

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Tepic, Mexico

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

1

Wat the Tyler wrote:
^
Albert copypastes this carp all the time. Ignore the homophobic bigot.
the truth hurts I see.....LOL

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

3

FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
Why in GOD'S NAME would somebody in Toronto CARE about what goes on in North Carolina ?!
Oh, sorry, it appears that you don't want a gay friend in another country. I'm sorry, I forgot you HATE gay rights and HATE gays actually being accepted as part of society in your self hating internalized homophobic head. Vote tea party folks, it is what Fred/Frank WANTS to happen.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Tepic, Mexico

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Bob wrote:
<quoted text>You're right Albert. I am tired of all this bigotry. I am going to just marry a female friend of mine. I, as her legal husband, will apply for her benefits. I will never sleep with her, so kids won't be a problem. I will never live with her, so property won't be an issue. I will live with my boyfriend (I call him husband, so fuck you), and I will sleep with him, and I will use any and all benefits that I get from being legally married, I will share with my husband. Life will be a bit complicated, but I will have benefits and if my wife happens to pass before me, my husband and I will enjoy her survivor benefits.
that is the only marriage you will ever have.....
But you could have had equal rights but gays did not want that they only wanted to change the meaning of the word marriage

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
the truth hurts I see.....LOL
Gee, FaFoxy, better get to work on this one..another person from out of the USA boundaries. WE know you hate THAT.
ProfessorofEduca tion

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
May 8, 2012
 
Pat Robertson s Fatwass wrote:
<quoted text>
No, the other moron didn't notice, because he also was too busy listening to drug addict, Rush L., spew venom all day.
Hey evilgelical nutcase, if we had laws saying talibangelical scumbuckets couldn't marry, adopt, serve openly, teach, be protected from arbitrary firing you freeeks wouldn't be characterizing such bigotry as "opposing views."
We know who the bigots are, and they're going the way of the KKK - to the farthest margins of polite society.
In North Carolina, you didn't have enough Democrats willing to care about your issue, let alone cheat.
Don't worry, come November, it gets better.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Tepic, Mexico

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Truth wrote:
Liberty and justice for all? Guess not.
guess so

NC had civil unions but you pushed the normal community until you lost equal rights under a civil union
We are now at almost 30 states that have done the same thing

You will soon long for a civil union

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Tepic, Mexico

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

3

FaFoxy wrote:
This amendment means nothing. Gay marriage was already illegal in North Carolina. But this is akin to the laws that prevented, nor recognized interracial marriages half a century ago.

SCOTUS will rule these types of state constitutional amendments, and states laws unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment and the full faith and credit clause.

This vote means nothing except to show how backwards and prejudiced so many people in the South are.
the attitude of the gay community has turned the normal people against you

Gay pride parades with sex on the streets and perverts like the two on the cruise ship have sunk your cause

If decency was in your vocabulary we would not be having this discussion

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 20 of5,908
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••