Chicago Chick-fil-A owner wants to talk with Emanuel

NWmoon wrote:

denying a significant portion of our citizenry of their rights.

Is 2% a significant portion?

What if 2% of the population wanted to marry a horse? How would it harm you in any way?

So according to you, we should allow that?

The sanctity of marriage should be an anything goes free for all? To think otherwise makes you a homophobic bigot?

How judgmental of you.

Miss Blue Diamond Diva wrote:

<quoted text> Gay is Gay, in your face or not. No diference.

Huge difference because there are gays who want nothing to do with marriage or anything else. They just live their lives and want to be left alone. They don't attend rallies, demand society change for them, flaunt their homosexuality, but are content they are with who they wish to be with.

FaFoxy wrote:

<quoted text>
What is WORSE is IN YOUR FACE heterosexuals, announcing they're going steady, announcing they're pregnant ! Announcing engagements !
Lavish IN YOUR FACE weddings ! Why can't they keep they're sexuality to themselves ?! Why do they have to constantly advertise it so much ?!
Sometimes after they get married, they wear "secret signals" on their fingers to announce they're shtupping somone ! For God's sake, keep it to yourself !!! Does EVERYONE have to know about your sex life and your totallly uncontrollable and weird attraction to the opposite gender ?!

There is nothing "weird" about being attracted to somebody of the opposite sex. Weird is being attracted to somebody of the same sex. If being attracted to the same sex were natural, same sex couples would be able to procreate. They would not disgust others. They would be accepted by all walks of life.

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>So you are saying people should hide who they really are.
No pictures of their loved ones on their desk.(It's OK for you, but not for others you don't like...)
No discussing their personal lives.(Well, you can , but not the gays...)
Are you beginning to see why your descendents will be calling you your rightful name of prejudicial bigot?

Nobody said "hide" but only to keep their personal life personal. Gay relationships make normal people uncomfortable. We know it happens, but don't want to hear about it. We don't want to see it, experience it, or accept it as normal behavior.

Live and be happy is what I always say. You don't need to shove your abnormal behavior down the throats of others in order to accomplish that. Many a gay people are quite happy without marriage or the insistence that society accepts them.

John wrote:

<quoted text>
The fruits

Did you tell that one to your fellow cavedwellers?

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
Correct, I don't. But from most of my heterosexual friends and family I have, they share my views.
Just how are homosexuals considered second class citizens? They can vote, purchase homes and automobiles, gain employment, will their belongings and finances to another, live together, have sex together. What is with this second class citizen nonsense?
Marriage is not a right. It's not a club. It's not a group. Marriage is the legal definition of one man and one woman uniting under religious and legal status. No state in our union prohibits gay marriage, it's just that the citizens of such states don't respect that marriage. But if you can find some religious organization to marry two people of the same sex, no government authority can stop it.

I'm just shocked that your friends and family say they agree with you, shocked./end sarcasm.
I do not agree with your definition of marriage, therefore nothing you say about that is relevant to me. It is legal in some of our states and in many other countries. It will be legal here.
You don't have to like it anymore than my grandparents and parents liked integration or the Loving decision.

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
Nobody said "hide" but only to keep their personal life personal. Gay relationships make normal people uncomfortable. We know it happens, but don't want to hear about it. We don't want to see it, experience it, or accept it as normal behavior.
Live and be happy is what I always say. You don't need to shove your abnormal behavior down the throats of others in order to accomplish that. Many a gay people are quite happy without marriage or the insistence that society accepts them.

YOU don't get to define marriage.

Why are you wasting so much time on mutations? I just don't get it. Let the stranges stay in the closet. We are all better off.

One more thing. Why would anyone want to talk to deadfish rahm. He is the complete moron.Little hitler.

edogxxx wrote:

<quoted text>
Is 2% a significant portion?
What if 2% of the population wanted to marry a horse? How would it harm you in any way?
So according to you, we should allow that?
The sanctity of marriage should be an anything goes free for all? To think otherwise makes you a homophobic bigot?
How judgmental of you.

Two percent? Never heard that low an estimate. But regardless, that IS a significant number of people if they're being denied their rights, and, they are.
Horses? Now you're just being stupid. Horses cannot sign contracts or give consent. Why do all of you haters always go there?
It's not judgement, it's just calling it like it is. You want to prevent people having equal rights based on their orientation. The people's orientation you want to go without equal rights is homosexual. That makes you a homophobic bigot.
You fit the definition, therefore it's not being judgemental.
What makes you think that YOU get to judge those who love differently than you do to be undeserving of equal rights?
You ARE a homophobic bigot.

Funny, the post I clicked to answer was written by xxxrayted. But up there it says it's a dog. A lying pile of shyte who can't even use a single name but must have troll names to get others to interact with him.
FOADIAF you pile of rotted smegma.
I would have a drink to celebrate.
It would be a benefit to the world.

Ah, I see you are two people, or maybe not. Regardless, you're still a waste of space.

obarry wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree, the bigotry and hate is terrible, look at the way Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, the nation of islm and louis Farrakhan, Jeremiah Wright, William Ayres, Maxine waters......sickening.

We won't be able to reverse the three years Obama has used to divide Americans into "hyphenated' bunch of disconnected Losers but with time we can heal.

The bottom line is, gay marriage does NO harm to no one. Marriage as defined by the Bible is too effing bizarre to be considered in the 21st century as a religious-only proposition and- AND- we are NOT a theocracy.

Marriage is a contract. There's no legal reason to prohibit gays from marrying.

Everyone come off it. There is a bit of racism and prejudice in everyone so those that are acting holier than thou, get off your high horse.

If you deny it, you are a liar!

NWmoon wrote:

<quoted text>Dude, you just don't get it. You've ALREADY lost.
It's legal in some states, and even if it does have to wait to qualify by popular vote, it will be legal in every state in a few years anyway. All the delay by you haters does is make the US look more stupid for denying a significant portion of our citizenry of their rights.
It's not going to be compulsory you know, they're not going to force you to marry a man.
Tell me please, just what damages have you suffered due to the marriages of all the gays who are already legally married worldwide?
What ACTUAL damages have you suffered? How has it harmed you?
Your outrage and hurt feelings from being considered a homophobic bigot do not count.
What are your damages?

Way to ignore the law dude!

You just had you racial analogy go down in flames & you think I'm going to answer your pointless questions?

Try addressing something of substance first.

Dane Thorsen wrote:

<quoted text>
We won't be able to reverse the three years Obama has used to divide Americans into "hyphenated' bunch of disconnected Losers but with time we can heal.

how about the 8 years of bush's failures, thanks to him you are living in desperation to re-take the house, pay back is a b---- is in it?

Larry Meber wrote:

The bottom line is, gay marriage does NO harm to no one. Marriage as defined by the Bible is too effing bizarre to be considered in the 21st century as a religious-only proposition and- AND- we are NOT a theocracy.
Marriage is a contract. There's no legal reason to prohibit gays from marrying.

a new poll now reveals that 51% of americans support gay marriage, to only 49% opposing it, and i didn't make up this numbers, i got an e-mail fro Newsmax last week with the news.

edogxxx wrote:

<quoted text>
Is 2% a significant portion?
What if 2% of the population wanted to marry a horse? How would it harm you in any way?
So according to you, we should allow that?
The sanctity of marriage should be an anything goes free for all? To think otherwise makes you a homophobic bigot?
How judgmental of you.

Well, for one your horse can not sign the marriage certificate so that is moot. The significant is more like 5-8%. Don't they have a free for all in Vegas? Do tell about the sanctity of marriages that happen their. ROTFL! Oh ya the 72 day sanctity marriage of Kardashian.

Fitz wrote:

<quoted text>
Way to ignore the law dude!
You just had you racial analogy go down in flames & you think I'm going to answer your pointless questions?
Try addressing something of substance first.

The law says it's legal in six states, DC, and many nations that are ahead of us in many other areas as well.
You won't answer because you have no damages, it doesn't affect you at all.
Every gay man and woman should have, and will have the same right to marry the person they love that I have enjoyed in my life.

And now, since this thread has been contaminated by dogshyte, I will depart. Rave on haters, you've already lost and you just can't admit it.

The good news is they can't reproduce. TG. That means less democrats. woowhooo