|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Joined: Nov 10, 2007
Comments: 4998
Tawas City, Michigan
ISP:
Oscoda, MI
|
Rigid wrote: <quoted text> see you cannot back up far enough to be on equal ground with me . the bill says sexual orientation ,in context with Homosexuals ,lesbians and transgendered. try reading what is there and stop trying to make it something it is not . I know you would like it to be different LOL but this bill was designed specifically to cover the sub cultures that were mentioned . WRONG. I have read the bill, and it states SEXUAL ORIENTATION. Last time I checked, that includes heterosexual, homosexual, & bisexuals. Unless you're not one of those, you're covered as well.
|
|
“FREEDOM OF THOUGHT”
Joined: Mar 15, 2008
Comments: 1595
Tularosa, NM
|
WeTheSheeple wrote: <quoted text> WRONG. I have read the bill, and it states SEXUAL ORIENTATION. Last time I checked, that includes heterosexual, homosexual, & bisexuals. Unless you're not one of those, you're covered as well. Ialso read the bill and did so in the context of its purpose . maybe you should try that ? until then show me any other legislation that supports the majority in a protection bill and you may convince me that you are right , otherwise I think the nature of the bill, its title and context all point to this being a protection from someone to someone else and is not majority inclusive legisaltion .
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Joined: Nov 10, 2007
Comments: 4998
Tawas City, Michigan
ISP:
Oscoda, MI
|
Rigid wrote: <quoted text> Ialso read the bill and did so in the context of its purpose . maybe you should try that ? until then show me any other legislation that supports the majority in a protection bill and you may convince me that you are right , otherwise I think the nature of the bill, its title and context all point to this being a protection from someone to someone else and is not majority inclusive legisaltion . Ummm how about the previous hate crimes bill which covered religion. That would be the majority of Americans no matter how you slice it. ? If you say the sexual orientation is a secret plot to only cover gays, then who does gender cover? Women? Men? Neither? Face it, you're just worried that all you gay-bashing is going to land you in prison.
|
|
“TODAYS DEMOCRAT”
Joined: Oct 21, 2009
Comments: 214
Indianapolis, IN
|
Rigid wrote: <quoted text> Ialso read the bill and did so in the context of its purpose . maybe you should try that ? until then show me any other legislation that supports the majority in a protection bill and you may convince me that you are right , otherwise I think the nature of the bill, its title and context all point to this being a protection from someone to someone else and is not majority inclusive legisaltion . He can't and he won't. He is so clised minded on any conversation that his best argument is to calls peopel names and insult them! I really think this clown is Perez Hilton or either he has meantal disorder!
|
|
“FREEDOM OF THOUGHT”
Joined: Mar 15, 2008
Comments: 1595
Tularosa, NM
|
WeTheSheeple wrote: <quoted text> Ummm how about the previous hate crimes bill which covered religion. That would be the majority of Americans no matter how you slice it. ? If you say the sexual orientation is a secret plot to only cover gays, then who does gender cover? Women? Men? Neither? Face it, you're just worried that all you gay-bashing is going to land you in prison. I don't gay bash ,I have no fear of going to jail . and your intimation that I do should be more of a worry for you legally if in fact the bill is as you say. good job with the threat though , I have copied it to my next letter to the congressmen and women who represent this country. no wonder you guys have lost in every state that has put the initiative on the ballot. but just to show you I have no hard feelings, I will help you with a little bit of commentary on the hate crimes bill of 2009 . Officially Preferred Victims: Liberty University law professor Shawn Akers writes that if H.R. 1913, the federal “Hate Crimes” bill, becomes law,“local and state law enforcement would have the incentive of federal funds to prosecute cases involving … preferred victims to the exclusion and neglect of less valuable victims.” Membership in the “preferred” category is “based not on immutable characteristics but on the class member’s choice of sexual conduct … and subjective gender self-identity.”
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Joined: Nov 10, 2007
Comments: 4998
Tawas City, Michigan
ISP:
Oscoda, MI
|
Rigid wrote: <quoted text> I don't gay bash ,I have no fear of going to jail . and your intimation that I do should be more of a worry for you legally if in fact the bill is as you say. good job with the threat though , I have copied it to my next letter to the congressmen and women who represent this country. no wonder you guys have lost in every state that has put the initiative on the ballot. but just to show you I have no hard feelings, I will help you with a little bit of commentary on the hate crimes bill of 2009 . Officially Preferred Victims: Liberty University law professor Shawn Akers writes that if H.R. 1913, the federal “Hate Crimes” bill, becomes law,“local and state law enforcement would have the incentive of federal funds to prosecute cases involving … preferred victims to the exclusion and neglect of less valuable victims.” Membership in the “preferred” category is “based not on immutable characteristics but on the class member’s choice of sexual conduct … and subjective gender self-identity.” Oh poor baby, welcome to my world! Straight white men have been a "preferred" group since the founding of this country. Now maybe you'll know how it feels to worry if you will get equal treatment under the law. Keep looking over your shoulder, the gays are gonna get you....
|
|
“FREEDOM OF THOUGHT”
Joined: Mar 15, 2008
Comments: 1595
Tularosa, NM
|
WeTheSheeple wrote: <quoted text> Oh poor baby, welcome to my world! Straight white men have been a "preferred" group since the founding of this country. Now maybe you'll know how it feels to worry if you will get equal treatment under the law. Keep looking over your shoulder, the gays are gonna get you.... look over my shoulder I don't think so ,Iam the proactive type . see you at the polls !
|
|
Eaglefan9727
Lowell, MA
|
WeTheSheeple wrote: So we'll take our issues through the legislatures where possible and to the courts when necessary. And the reason why is, Because you want to keep acting like little children when they cant get something and have to cry to their mom or dad to get it. Grow up.....
|
|
|
|
judge_roy_bean
Mountain View, CA
|
Eaglefan9727 wrote: <quoted text> And the reason why is, Because you want to keep acting like little children when they cant get something and have to cry to their mom or dad to get it. Grow up..... Sounds like you just gave a perfect description of fox news.
|
|
Eaglefan9727
Lowell, MA
|
judge_roy_bean wrote: Sounds like you just gave a perfect description of fox news. Not really...Just because fox news doesnt kiss a@@ like all the other stattions do. It doesnt fit the description.
|
|
fedupwiththemess
Ashburn, VA
|
Great job...Maine voters!
|
|
Shady Lady
Carol Stream, IL
|
Judged:
1
Marriage laws were written centuries ago, and they had nothing to do with you. Marriage is defined as a contract between a man, and a woman, not 2 men, or 2 women.
|
Joined: Apr 4, 2009
Comments: 2434
Chicago, IL
|
Shady Lady wrote: Marriage laws were written centuries ago, and they had nothing to do with you. Marriage is defined as a contract between a man, and a woman, not 2 men, or 2 women. Blah, blah, blah. Marriage laws also used to state that you had to be of the same race to get married. Things change.
|
|
fedupwiththemess
Ashburn, VA
|
Just Think wrote: <quoted text> Blah, blah, blah. Marriage laws also used to state that you had to be of the same race to get married. Things change. They at least had the right sex.
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Joined: Nov 10, 2007
Comments: 4998
Tawas City, Michigan
ISP:
Oscoda, MI
|
Eaglefan9727 wrote: <quoted text> And the reason why is, Because you want to keep acting like little children when they cant get something and have to cry to their mom or dad to get it. Grow up..... Oooooh, that really hurt.....NOT! So long as it irritates you, that's the main thing. Still waiting for the people's revolution in Mass.......
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Joined: Nov 10, 2007
Comments: 4998
Tawas City, Michigan
ISP:
Oscoda, MI
|
Shady Lady wrote: Marriage laws were written centuries ago, and they had nothing to do with you. Marriage is defined as a contract between a man, and a woman, not 2 men, or 2 women. Pssst. Laws can be changed....... We're changing that definition because we don't like it.
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Joined: Nov 10, 2007
Comments: 4998
Tawas City, Michigan
ISP:
Oscoda, MI
|
Glenn Beck Supporter wrote: Gays have no rights! The only right they have is to change their ways and ask Jesus for forgiveness! If they don't they will suffer for eternity. GOD created AIDS to destroy the wicked homosexual people in this world. Read Levitcus Chapter 18. GOD describes homosexuals as "VOMIT". Good Luck Sinners Obama can't protect you from GOD! Well then your "god" creature missed, because WAY more heteros are dying across the world from AIDS than gays are. Didn't you hear, we're all rich and can afford the best medication to keep us alive. As for the poor overly religious hetero freaks, well, sorry to say, they're all dying, and their kids are dying too. Oh well, less bigots in the world. I hardly need Obama to protect me from a fairytale creature.
|
|
quid pro quo
|
Judged:
1
1
fedupwiththemess wrote: <quoted text>They at least had the right sex. If you were involved, there was no sex at all.
|
Joined: Apr 4, 2009
Comments: 2434
Chicago, IL
|
Glenn Beck Supporter wrote: Gays have no rights! The only right they have is to change their ways and ask Jesus for forgiveness! If they don't they will suffer for eternity. GOD created AIDS to destroy the wicked homosexual people in this world. Read Levitcus Chapter 18. GOD describes homosexuals as "VOMIT". Good Luck Sinners Obama can't protect you from GOD! Yawn. You people have become a parody.
|
|
quid pro quo
|
Judged:
1
1
Just Think wrote: <quoted text> Yawn. You people have become a parody. You ought to see them on the "Left is Deranged" thread if you think they're inane on here.
|
|
|