AFA Blames Gays For Penn States' Coverup Of Sandusky Crimes

Just another pile of opinionation.

Go kiss yourself.

snyper wrote:

<quoted text>
Listen twitter-head.
It's NOT we who are saying it. It's the experts. The Psychologists. The Sociologists. The Criminologists. The specialists in Child Abuse. THEY are the ones say it. We are just passing the info on to you. We can supply links to where they say it. You'll have to dig into their professional literature to read WHY they say it, but say it they do.
Just because you have an internet connection and an opinion DOES NOT put you an a par with the experts in the various fields that deal with these monsters. Further, same is true of demagogues with an agenda and a website.
Got it?

Listen up self centered rightious breath, I don't care about most of the modern experts. If their political affiliation is progressive in view then so is their findings, rulings, etc. And the extortion of taxes, fees, fines and everything else hidden gives me that right so far, to type on this board until I am forced to stop or banned by the administrators. Since so many have thrown away literature from the past because it was so barbaric and less secular, we are getting are just desserts and this is the tip of the iceberg. The tragedy of this is that many men at Penn State are from another era, spouted integrity with many successes and in the end let a whole bunch of people down by letting this guy do what he did.

serfs up wrote:

<quoted text> Listen up self centered rightious breath, I don't care about most of the modern experts. If their political affiliation is progressive in view then so is their findings, rulings, etc. And the extortion of taxes, fees, fines and everything else hidden gives me that right so far, to type on this board until I am forced to stop or banned by the administrators. Since so many have thrown away literature from the past because it was so barbaric and less secular, we are getting are just desserts and this is the tip of the iceberg. The tragedy of this is that many men at Penn State are from another era, spouted integrity with many successes and in the end let a whole bunch of people down by letting this guy do what he did.

You have the right to your opinions. You do.

But there's no rational reason to give them any weight.

The rest are just calumnous insinuations.

Brown Lipstick wrote:

It wouldn't be the first or last time so called experts are wrong. Why do you think our politians have a 20% job approval rating.

Scientists aren't politicians. I would have more trust in the findings of science than the claims of any random stranger on the internet.

Brown Lipstick wrote:

Perversion exists at many levels and has varying degrees of wrongdoing, and has breached all levels of professionalism, gay or straight.
Examples of perverse acts:
Adultery among traditional marriage.
Multiple sex partners within traditional marriage.
Incest, brother with sister.
Incest, brother with brother, worse than brother and sister.
Incest, sister with sister, worse than sister and brother.
Pedophiles, Adult male with young girl, awful.
Pedophiles, Adult male with young boy, even worse.
Pedophiles, Adult women, with young boy, awful.
Pedophiles, Adult women, with young girls, even worse.
To varying degrees these are all examples of perversion and are not normal and should remain illegal.

To be perfectly accurate, these are all perversions IN YOUR OPINION. You don't hold the label maker for all of society. Each person will have to decide each of these things themselves. Many people would quickly discount your 2nd item, "Multiple sex partners within traditional marriage". As long as all partners are informed and consenting, it doesn't need to be illegal, it isn't "perversion", and it isn't really any of your business.

Brown Lipstick wrote:

Homosexuals need any one of the above to rationalize and make their own acts appear and seem normal.
The homosexual inferior complex.

That doesn't even make sense. We don't "need" ANY of your examples. Who needs them? Why? How?

Homosexuality IS normal, that's all there is to it. It isn't the most common sexual orientation, but it exists in huge numbers around the planet. No one needs to "rationalize" it.

The only "rationalizing" happening is how to ostracize and stigmatize good people who are committing no crimes. Why would you seek to do this?

Brown Lipstick wrote:

Progressives have internally and morally destroyed America for decades through pornography and drugs and projected it all through the television via Follywood. Follywood is the homosexuals' culture.
Sex sex sex!
Who owns and runs it all out there?

Empty, baseless claims. Where's your proof? Where's this "moral destruction"? Just because the world has CHANGED from the 1950's, doesn't mean it's "destroyed". Just because it isn't the world that YOU want it to be, doesn't mean it's bad or immoral. The people on your "side" of this argument have become the KINGS of making vague, doomsday-sounding, sky-is-falling comments like these, without EVER being able to back it up with direct evidence.

If you don't like the idea of homosexuality, then you don't have to engage in it. You don't sit in any position of authority or superiority to tell other people how to live.

Wow.

Over-generalizations. Mis-groupings. "Post hoc" fallacies. Calumny.

Very disordered thinking there, boyo.

snyper wrote:

<quoted text>
You have the right to your opinions. You do.
But there's no rational reason to give them any weight.
The rest are just calumnous insinuations.

By the way. It seems there are limits to rights as I answered back and had to replace a not to nice word as the administrator took exception to it. One other thing. At the time, the Penn State assistant McCreary who saw a sex act in the shower room between Sandusky and a kid. Perhaps he should have confronted Sandusky there and stopped it. The ramifications of that with his career and/or personal safety I don't know about. But to try to protect a child from a predator would have been the right thing to do.

Brown Lipstick wrote:

Examples of perverse acts:
Incest, brother with sister.
Incest, brother with brother, worse than brother and sister.
Incest, sister with sister, worse than sister and brother.
Pedophiles, Adult male with young girl, awful.
Pedophiles, Adult male with young boy, even worse.
Pedophiles, Adult women, with young boy, awful.
Pedophiles, Adult women, with young girls, even worse.

It's simply pathetic for you to claim that a harmful sexual act between an Adult male/young girl or an Adult woman/young boy is SIMPLY AWFUL, but when it is between either an Adult male/young boy or an Adult woman/young girl....it is even worse......sorry, but ALL OR ANY SEXUAL ACTS BETWEEN ADULTS AND CHILDREN ARE EXTREMELY WRONG, HARMFUL AND ALL WHO COMMIT THESE HORRIFIC CRIMES SHOULD BE SEVERELY PUNISHED.......you are just simply a pathetic loser troll!!!

serfs up wrote:

<quoted text> By the way. It seems there are limits to rights as I answered back and had to replace a not to nice word as the administrator took exception to it. One other thing. At the time, the Penn State assistant McCreary who saw a sex act in the shower room between Sandusky and a kid. Perhaps he should have confronted Sandusky there and stopped it. The ramifications of that with his career and/or personal safety I don't know about. But to try to protect a child from a predator would have been the right thing to do.

I totally agree with you and this post.....ANY COACH who saw Sandusky doing anything that even looked inappropriate should have reported it......better to step in and protect the child, than do nothing and and regret it later......the harm done can heal in time, but to have prevented the harm in the first place would have been better and the right thing to do.

Sandusky is a living example of what society is concerned about with gays.
The man preyed on young man under his authority. He had no regard for their sexual integrity, purity or views.
He was a predator who only wanted to satisfy what he wanted sexually. He would say he was born that way and its 'normal'.

kato wrote:

Sandusky is a living example of what society is concerned about with gays.

No, your post is an example of how YOU have been misinformed about gay people. Discussions about gays and lesbians are discussions about ADULTS who are only interested in OTHER ADULTS. Pedophiles are a whole different ball game. YOU might CHOOSE to mix the two concepts, so that you can feel free to accuse people of crimes that they haven't committed, but most intelligent people in society know the difference.

kato wrote:

The man preyed on young man under his authority. He had no regard for their sexual integrity, purity or views.

I don't know if he NEEDED to have regard for those things. He needed to have regard for their AGE, but he chose not to.

kato wrote:

He was a predator who only wanted to satisfy what he wanted sexually. He would say he was born that way and its 'normal'.

Is that what he would say? How do you know? Did you ask him? Or do you just have a magic power that lets you pull people's thoughts out of their heads?

Gay people who enter into MUTUAL relationships with CONSENTING adults are not "predators".

Sandusky's crime revolves around the AGE of his victims, NOT their gender. You have absolutely no reason to simply DECIDE that gay people are guilty of the same crime. You are not justified in slandering innocent people with one person's crime.

kato wrote:

Sandusky is a living example of what society is concerned about with gays.
The man preyed on young man under his authority. He had no regard for their sexual integrity, purity or views.
He was a predator who only wanted to satisfy what he wanted sexually. He would say he was born that way and its 'normal'.

how come you never heard of gay/straight females doing these things?Because we don't.

Here's a wild idea.. Blame Sandusky and anyone who knew about it. And only them.

Brown Lipstick wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama is inviting the Muslim Brotherhood into your home, good luck with that.

"Obama's Plan To Bring 50 Million Muslim Immigrants To America"

"The shocking plan by Obama to first grant amnesty to the 12 million illegal immigrants already in this country, and then, to bring in an estimated 50 million ..."

www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/...

Once again fundietards demonstrate just how vile and disgusting they really are. Fundietards should be exterminated! The afa is a collection of the worse vermin in the country! I would turn my back on any gay person before I would turn my back on these vile disgusting fundietards!

serfs up wrote:

<quoted text> Listen up self centered rightious breath, I don't care about most of the modern experts. If their political affiliation is progressive in view then so is their findings, rulings, etc. And the extortion of taxes, fees, fines and everything else hidden gives me that right so far, to type on this board until I am forced to stop or banned by the administrators. Since so many have thrown away literature from the past because it was so barbaric and less secular, we are getting are just desserts and this is the tip of the iceberg. The tragedy of this is that many men at Penn State are from another era, spouted integrity with many successes and in the end let a whole bunch of people down by letting this guy do what he did.

once agian:

'what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.'

Brown Lipstick wrote:

<quoted text>
Nothing like growing your voter base illegally. The only thing I can think of with 50 million Muslims is he is trying to get them to make peace with the Jews. This country is so screwed up I don't trust anyone anymore. Full of perverts and drug abusers and to think this president may get re-elected goes to show how stupid this country really has become.
I guess the bible was right after all.

and the real irony is... wait for it... here it comes...
you're actually stupid enough to believe this shit.

It must be true,you found it on the Internet!

Damned fool!

luv Sarah Palin wrote:

<quoted text>
"Obama's Plan To Bring 50 Million Muslim Immigrants To America"
"The shocking plan by Obama to first grant amnesty to the 12 million illegal immigrants already in this country, and then, to bring in an estimated 50 million ..."
www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/...

far more hets were involved in the peen state crimes

ie

mrs. js

and

millions more hets are raping children as u read this

shame!!!

cc this to roman p and r kelly

http://aliciabanks.xanga.com/736313887/roman-...

http://aliciabanks.xanga.com/733357145/r-kell...

Brown Lipstick wrote:

.

Internet troll....

dances with weebles wrote:

<quoted text>
once agian:
'what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.'

Stop speaking about God. Lightning bolts will strike you. Now keep stomping on everyone that does not agree with you 100%. Times are tough and getting worse. Tolerance or lack of it is a two way street. And it is early in the turmoil that is a depression that will last for many more years. You'll see. Your monolithic one track brain is only capable of one type of thought. And you are the most bitter in a world of people that has many types.