Exxon CEO blames 'illiterate' public for 'overreacting' to global warming

Judged:

3

2

2

Earthling-1 wrote:

He certainly got the 'illiterate' part right.
"Overreacting," definitely.

Judged:

3

3

3

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, you are describing yourself.

Judged:

4

3

2

tina anne wrote:

The funny thing is he is right about how illiterate the average american is when it comes to subjects like science and history. If people knew history then they would know that these same claims have been made in the past. That claims of doom and gloom have been made several times in the past couple of century.
If one could wave a wand and everyone in the world knew all about history then man made global warming would die within a week.

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
And yet you do it all the time. Any time something disagrees with the concept of manmade global warming is something you ignore.
The funny thing is the past tells us one and all that for last ten thousand years we have seen far more dramatic climate changes. Continental ice sheets have retreated and will disappear with the only the evidence of their existence to tell the tale.
River valleys and canyons that were mammoths once grazed and saber tooth tigers once hunted are now the home of swordfish and whales and the resting place of shipwrecks that were old when George Washington was in diapers.
What past climate change tells us that those who still believe that alarmist suffer from a case of hubris.

Judged:

5

3

3

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>You have no idea that you are describing yourself. Go to a history thread and leave us alone in this science site.
<quoted text>You nag. That's all you do.
You don't know science or mathematics. Your language sucks. Yet you nag and nag.
LOL

Judged:

3

2

2

DudTenners wrote:

<quoted text>you are as stupid as Litesong,so are you an Injun as well, or don´t you have an excuse?

Judged:

2

2

2

DudTenners wrote:

you are as stupid as Litesong,so are you an Injun as well, or don´t you have an excuse?

Judged:

3

3

2

Earthling-1 wrote:

<quoted text> too stupid to be an injun[sic].

Judged:

3

3

2

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>You have no idea that you are describing yourself. Go to a history thread and leave us alone in this science site.
<quoted text>You nag. That's all you do.
You don't know science or mathematics. Your language sucks. Yet you nag and nag.
LOL

Judged:

2

2

1

DudTenners wrote:

<quoted text>you are as stupid as Litesong,so are you an Injun as well, or don´t you have an excuse?

Judged:

2

2

2

DudTenners wrote:

<quoted text>you are as stupid as Litesong,so are you an Injun as well, or don´t you have an excuse?

Judged:

3

3

3

Nauseous wrote:

You make me sick.

Judged:

2

2

2

DudTenners wrote:

you are as stupid as Litesong,so are you an Injun as well, or don´t you have an excuse?

Judged:

2

1

1

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
Could it be that you are upset about someone talking about the history of climate change? Of course that could be that every time I educate someone about the subject that person will have a harder time accepting the concept of man-made global warming.
It is also funny how you complain about my "language" when yours is even worse. I know I have room for improvement and while not perfect it has improved. As for science, I may not know it all but I am confident that I know more than you. As for mathematics, I share an office with a math expert and she has helped improve my ability in that area to the point that I tested out of the math requirements for my current course load.
As for nagging you, if I don’t nag you, you will never change. You will sit there and smugly think you are right and you have no need to improve yourself.

Judged:

1

1

1

SpaceBlow wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, you are.
Stay in bed.
Your career is kaput here.

Judged:

2

2

1

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>
You make me sick.