Josh Greenberger: Most Honest Assessment of Evolution

Check out his great book: http://evolutiondead.com

Josh Greenberger's book disproving evolution is most informative, humorous, forthright and honest. I highly recommend his book and articles.

He's loved be honest people because he speaks the truth.

He's hated by evolutionists because ... well ... he speaks the truth.

bonzee wrote:

Check out his great book: http://evolutiondead.com
Josh Greenberger's book disproving evolution is most informative, humorous, forthright and honest. I highly recommend his book and articles.
He's loved be honest people because he speaks the truth.
He's hated by evolutionists because ... well ... he speaks the truth.

He has been debunked so many times on these threads I'm surprized someone (Josh?) brought it back up.

Give it a rest.

Nice to see Josh has returned. We missed you, Joshums!

bonzee wrote:

Check out his great book:...
Josh Greenberger's book disproving evolution is most informative, humorous, forthright and honest....

doesn't sound at all honest

probably he does sciencey language and misrepresents actual science and mines quotes

either way, he's the joke adn sadly, you choose to be the butt end of it.

Love this review on the Lulu Marketplace website.

"1 Person Reviewed This Item

No Rating
Oct. 29, 2009
By Josh Greenberger
"Who Let The Apes Out?" by Josh Greenberger is a book that brings up numerous inconsistencies in scientific theories in biology and space. It points out phenomena that are supposed to support evolution but actually disprove it. The book never gets too deep or technical. Fun reading for just about anyone."

Josh Greenburger reviewing a book by ... Josh Greenburger.

Doesn't even bother to create a sock puppet to praise himself anonymously.

Self published collection of 'letters and articles [that] have appeared in just about every major New York newspaper".

"disproves" the vast amount of evidence for the Theory of Evolution accumulated over the course of 150 years by tens of millions of scientists for only $7.95 and in just 95 pages.

Amazing.

Josh...

Shame on you. Making yet another sock puppet to brag about your own book. For shame. For shame. For shame.

Darwins Stepchild wrote:

Josh...
Shame on you. Making yet another sock puppet to brag about your own book. For shame. For shame. For shame.

We all have something to be ashamed of.

nina wrote:

<quoted text>
doesn't sound at all honest
probably he does sciencey language and misrepresents actual science and mines quotes
either way, he's the joke adn sadly, you choose to be the butt end of it.

Josh (apparently) has many many fans, all of which lavish him with the kind of praise most Kings would gush at.

http://www.topix.net/forum/news/evolution/TCC...

Oh hi Josh by the way.

MIDutch wrote:

The book never gets too deep or technical.

Obviously. Because it can't.

It's amazing to what lengths and lies evolutionists will go to attack anyone who gives an honest and hard-hitting opinion like Josh Greenberger. Not one thread on this site has debunked anything Josh Greenberger has said. He's been attacked, not debunked. I know to you mindless-followers of evolution it's the same. That's why you people believe in evolution; truth and honesty mean nothing to you.

I don't see anyone here addressing the complete dishonesty and phoniness of the fossil "Ida." Such deceptions is exactly what evolution is about. And you gullible nitwits are what it takes to perpetuate this evolution religion.

I hope none of you fools go blowing yourselves up for your religion, believing that you'll go to heaven and get 72 fossils.

TCboler wrote:

It's amazing to what lengths and lies evolutionists will go to attack anyone who gives an honest and hard-hitting opinion like Josh Greenberger. Not one thread on this site has debunked anything Josh Greenberger has said. He's been attacked, not debunked. I know to you mindless-followers of evolution it's the same. That's why you people believe in evolution; truth and honesty mean nothing to you.
I don't see anyone here addressing the complete dishonesty and phoniness of the fossil "Ida." Such deceptions is exactly what evolution is about. And you gullible nitwits are what it takes to perpetuate this evolution religion.
I hope none of you fools go blowing yourselves up for your religion, believing that you'll go to heaven and get 72 fossils.

You're pretty funny Josh.

TCboler wrote:

It's amazing to what lengths and lies evolutionists will go to attack anyone who gives an honest and hard-hitting opinion like Josh Greenberger. Not one thread on this site has debunked anything Josh Greenberger has said. He's been attacked, not debunked. I know to you mindless-followers of evolution it's the same. That's why you people believe in evolution; truth and honesty mean nothing to you.
I don't see anyone here addressing the complete dishonesty and phoniness of the fossil "Ida." Such deceptions is exactly what evolution is about. And you gullible nitwits are what it takes to perpetuate this evolution religion.
I hope none of you fools go blowing yourselves up for your religion, believing that you'll go to heaven and get 72 fossils.

Oh, boy. Another Josh sock puppet!!!

TCboler wrote:

... Not one thread on this site has debunked anything Josh Greenberger has said....

there's no reason to debunk plainly ridiculous nonsense

his attempt to debunk evolution fails to sway

so, not need to debunk a failed debunking

TCboler wrote:

It's amazing to what lengths and lies evolutionists will go to attack anyone who gives an honest and hard-hitting opinion like Josh Greenberger. Not one thread on this site has debunked anything Josh Greenberger has said. He's been attacked, not debunked. I know to you mindless-followers of evolution it's the same. That's why you people believe in evolution; truth and honesty mean nothing to you.
I don't see anyone here addressing the complete dishonesty and phoniness of the fossil "Ida." Such deceptions is exactly what evolution is about. And you gullible nitwits are what it takes to perpetuate this evolution religion.
I hope none of you fools go blowing yourselves up for your religion, believing that you'll go to heaven and get 72 fossils.

Says bitter old Josh.

Give up the sock puppet game. Seriously. You're NOT fooling anyone.

TCboler wrote:

It's amazing to what lengths and lies evolutionists will go to attack anyone who gives an honest and hard-hitting opinion like Josh Greenberger.

That's the problem, isn't it? It is Josh's OPINION. He has every right to his opinion, no matter how WRONG it is, and more often than not Josh is VERY wrong.

TCboler wrote:

Not one thread on this site has debunked anything Josh Greenberger has said. He's been attacked, not debunked.

What's to debunk? It's all just one big argument from incredulity. Josh can't understand it, Josh doesn't want to believe it, so it MUST be false.

TCboler wrote:

I know to you mindless-followers of evolution it's the same. That's why you people believe in evolution; truth and honesty mean nothing to you.

Does anyone else see the irony in this statement?

"creationists" are FAMOUS for their misinformation, quote-mining and outright LIES, and yet have the gall to accuse the vast majority of the world who accept the biological Theory of Evolution as the best scientific explanation for the diversity of life we see on earth past and present as being dishonest.

TCboler wrote:

I don't see anyone here addressing the complete dishonesty and phoniness of the fossil "Ida." Such deceptions is exactly what evolution is about.

Ida is still being studied. There was some media over-hype, but it IS a REAL fossil, even if it was misclassified. On the other side of the coin, the Shroud of Turin, hundreds of vials of Jesus's "real" blood", thousands of splinters from the "true" cross, bleeding statues, "faith" healings, etc. perpetrated by YOUR side ARE phony.

How dishonest of YOU to point out a REAL fossil as being "phony" and then concluding that ALL of biology is invalid, but ignoring the THOUSANDS, if not MILLIONS, of cases of "christian" scams, quackery, deception that would, according to YOUR logic, have invalidated "christianity" and "creationism" CENTURIES ago.

TCboler wrote:

And you gullible nitwits are what it takes to perpetuate this evolution religion.

Don't forget to mention that the liberal, atheist, evilutionist blood sacrifices are every Saturday morning in the university parking lot.

TCboler wrote:

I hope none of you fools go blowing yourselves up for your religion, believing that you'll go to heaven and get 72 fossils.

Really odd statement. People who blow themselves and others up are almost always RELIGIOUS fanatics violently opposed to science and the progress of civilization, such as yourself.

Apparently Josh couldn't get on Letterman to hawk his comic book. He had to resort to going on Topix to self-promote.

Gail

Bam

TCboler

How many more sockpuppets has he up his sleeve?

95 pages!!! LOL.

I did a science paper in high school on Drosophila melangaster that was longer.

100 pages. A++. It was passed around the high school for years as the default "resource" for that particular biology class.

Very big type, double spaced with LOTS of really big charts, graphs and illustrations.

MIDutch wrote:

95 pages!!! LOL.
I did a science paper in high school on Drosophila melangaster that was longer.
100 pages. A++. It was passed around the high school for years as the default "resource" for that particular biology class.
Very big type, double spaced with LOTS of really big charts, graphs and illustrations.

For high school? That was overkill.

Sheila wrote:

<quoted text> For high school? That was overkill.

Goes to show that when someone has something with substance to say, a lot can be written.

But when one has little of substance to say, especially when writing uninformed ignorant critiques of subjects they are ignorant about, one doesn't need say much at all. The methods of propaganda. Anyone can put together a few sound-bites to make something look bad. Which is why Josh thinks that a 95 page straw-man argument disproves millions of pages of thousands of peer-reviewed scientific papers on evolution. If only it were so easy.

But can he come up with a valid rebuttal? To even ONE of those papers?

Never in his life-time.