Global Events Mark Magic Number on Climate Change

It is the new fake Godless religion that believes in empty baseless non-scientific number 350 parts per million of one molecule of CO2 in every 3000 molecules of air and 300 molecules of water H2O.
There are not even one reference scientific book in your library or in the bookstores that show any testes results versus time about the relation between temperature and the number of molecules of CO2 in every 3000 molecules of air and 300 molecules of water.
No ‘global warming’ fake ‘scientist’ ever published or presented data about the ten recent years when the temperatures are falling in a cooling effect in North America, Europe and Asia.
The new fake global warming liberal religion of the global warming is based on believing that if there was one molecule of CO2 out of every 2999 molecules of air and 299 molecules of water the world will come to an end.
Still the fake phony fraudulent Al Gore who was able to collect 100 million dollars by lying to our young generation with false facts about the polar bear population that increase during the last ten years.
The new liberal religion blames the American people for the increase of the CO2 molecules from one molecule in 3000 molecules of air to one molecule out of 299 molecules of air. They believe that abortion and killing babies will reduce the problems to the planet.
The lying liberals and their deceitful media of the anarchist George Soros who vowed to destroy America’s economy and the Jewish Elites of the NY Times, NBC and ABC want the American people to pay fine for ruining the planet, which is based on the lies of the Obama communist regime that needs your money for the union parasites and the Acorn gangsters and to use the money to buy the votes of the illegal immigrants.

Jones wrote:

It is the new fake Godless religion that believes in empty baseless non-scientific number 350 parts per million of one molecule of CO2 in every 3000 molecules of air and 300 molecules of water H2O.
There are not even one reference scientific book in your library or in the bookstores that show any testes results versus time about the relation between temperature and the number of molecules of CO2 in every 3000 molecules of air and 300 molecules of water.
No ‘global warming’ fake ‘scientist’ ever published or presented data about the ten recent years when the temperatures are falling in a cooling effect in North America, Europe and Asia.
The new fake global warming liberal religion of the global warming is based on believing that if there was one molecule of CO2 out of every 2999 molecules of air and 299 molecules of water the world will come to an end.
Still the fake phony fraudulent Al Gore who was able to collect 100 million dollars by lying to our young generation with false facts about the polar bear population that increase during the last ten years.
The new liberal religion blames the American people for the increase of the CO2 molecules from one molecule in 3000 molecules of air to one molecule out of 299 molecules of air. They believe that abortion and killing babies will reduce the problems to the planet.
The lying liberals and their deceitful media of the anarchist George Soros who vowed to destroy America’s economy and the Jewish Elites of the NY Times, NBC and ABC want the American people to pay fine for ruining the planet, which is based on the lies of the Obama communist regime that needs your money for the union parasites and the Acorn gangsters and to use the money to buy the votes of the illegal immigrants.

Let me see if I understand your position. You are claiming there is a religious conspiracy of scientists to fool people into believing that the climate is changing so that communist Obama can use Acorn to steal money for illegal immigrants.

1. Obama is a moderate conservative politician largely following Bush's lead, not a communist in any rational sense of the term.
2. Acorn is not a money laundering institution.
3. The literature on global warming is vast and convincing. You may have found some obscure point in question, but my guess is that there are lots of them. Science is like that, which is why it remains interesting.
3. Science is not a religion, although it may seem like one to someone who didn't pay attention in school.
4. The rest is just silly.

I suggest, as Thomas Merton once suggested, a martini and a swim. It should settle your nerves nicely.

Jones wrote:

It is the new fake Godless religion that believes in empty baseless non-scientific number 350 parts per million of one molecule of CO2 in every 3000 molecules of air and 300 molecules of water H2O.
There are not even one reference scientific book in your library or in the bookstores that show any testes results versus time about the relation between temperature and the number of molecules of CO2 in every 3000 molecules of air and 300 molecules of water.
No ‘global warming’ fake ‘scientist’ ever published or presented data about the ten recent years when the temperatures are falling in a cooling effect in North America, Europe and Asia.
The new fake global warming liberal religion of the global warming is based on believing that if there was one molecule of CO2 out of every 2999 molecules of air and 299 molecules of water the world will come to an end.
Still the fake phony fraudulent Al Gore who was able to collect 100 million dollars by lying to our young generation with false facts about the polar bear population that increase during the last ten years.
The new liberal religion blames the American people for the increase of the CO2 molecules from one molecule in 3000 molecules of air to one molecule out of 299 molecules of air. They believe that abortion and killing babies will reduce the problems to the planet.
The lying liberals and their deceitful media of the anarchist George Soros who vowed to destroy America’s economy and the Jewish Elites of the NY Times, NBC and ABC want the American people to pay fine for ruining the planet, which is based on the lies of the Obama communist regime that needs your money for the union parasites and the Acorn gangsters and to use the money to buy the votes of the illegal immigrants.

fake scientists? LOL ok - whatever you say. You keep ranting about the "fake scienctists"...I hope you are feeling all cozy with your head in the sand. You sound like a raving lunatic.

Jones wrote:

It is the new fake Godless religion that believes in empty baseless non-scientific number 350 parts per million of one molecule of CO2 in every 3000 molecules of air and 300 molecules of water H2O.

On average water comprises only 2% of the atmospheric molecules. You are 5 times off the correct answer. Since 99% of the air has little GHG warming ability, CO2, by your inferred numbers & effect, is 100 times too little. So far your post is showing signs of error, if not Godlessness.

At the obviously too conservative present rate of man-made CO2 emissions, extrapolated just over one hundred years, CO2 will comprise 0.1% by weight of the atmosphere. However, well before the hundred year period is over, CO2 warming could release massive quantities of GHG permafrost, hydrate & clathrate methane (25 times more GHG powerful than CO2). Already, two studies indicate that Arctic permafrosts & clathrates are releasing methane into the air. If permafrosts, hydrates, & clathrates increase methane levels by 5 times, our ability to control GHG warming would end.

litesong wrote:

Already, two studies indicate that Arctic permafrosts & clathrates are releasing methane into the air.

Now, a third study by MIT indicates that Arctic permafrosts & clathrates are releasing from the Arctic.

You quote:

"There are not even one reference scientific book in your library or in the bookstores that show any testes results versus time about the relation between temperature and the number of molecules of CO2 in every 3000 molecules of air and 300 molecules of water."

Point 1 - The grammar is wrong.

Point 2 - "testes" is the plural of testicals.
So what you are quoting to us is balls

womanspirit wrote:

<quoted text>
fake scientists? LOL ok - whatever you say. You keep ranting about the "fake scienctists"...I hope you are feeling all cozy with your head in the sand. You sound like a raving lunatic.

Maybe not "fake" but whores. Scientific whores. Whoring for the religion of global warming.

==

The lefties proclaim an imaginary problem to be "a planetary emergency"
Force others to be politically correct via control of money. And the thousands scientists, media and politicians make money by whoring and singing this political song, just ignore their conscience.

Politicians claim that they are the saviors and have saved us from certain doom, they get zillions to satisfy their spending lust and claim to be heroes.

A pretty good racket huh?

==

"No matter if the science is all phony, there [are] collateral environmental benefits...climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."

Christine Stewart,
Canadian Environment Minister,
Calgary Herald, December 14, 1998
http://www.mtmultipleuse.org/endangered/esahi...

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…

When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.”-

UN IPCC Japanese Scientist
Dr. Kiminori Itoh,
an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...

Czech-born U.S. climatologist
Dr. George Kukla,
a research scientist with the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University,

"...Why are some scientists worried? Perhaps because they feel that to stop worrying may mean to stop being paid,”

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...

==

Reid Bryson says global warming is “a bunch of hooey.” Is he a radical Right-winger? Is he a pro-business drone? No, he’s known as the father of scientific climatology.

“... there is no credible evidence that it is due to mankind and carbon dioxide.

“There is a lot of money to be made in this,” he added.“If you want to be an eminent scientist you have to have a lot of grad students and a lot of grants. You can’t get grants unless you say,‘Oh global warming, yes, yes, carbon dioxide.’”

“There is very little truth to what is being said and an awful lot of religion. It’s almost a religion. Where you have to believe in anthropogenic (or man-made) global warming or else you are nuts.”

http://www.dakotavoice.com/2007/06/father-of-...

==

World Climate Report editor Dr. Patrick J. Michaels has just written a book cataloging dozens of similar instances.

The reason is obvious.

The scientific community has a financial incentive to spout gloom and doom. Doing so generates oodles of money from our single sugar daddy, the federal government.

No one ever leverages billions out of or Nation’s Capital (the current annual outlay for “global change” research is $4 billion) unless they threaten the worst.

Then the political process takes credit for saving us from certain destruction.

And the media, addicted to “if it bleeds, it leads” stories, without questioning, print the worst.

Don’t expect scientific peer review to stop this process. To gain expert-review status, a scientist has to also have oodles of federally funded research. Who would rationally derail this gravy train?

All of which guarantees that my colleagues are going to continue to scream bloody climate murder with impunity.

It is simple economics interacting with politics, as evinced by unquestioningly published absolute nonsense.

http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2...

womanspirit post#3

Maybe not "fake" but whores. Scientific whores. Whoring for the religion of global warming.

==

The lefties proclaim an imaginary problem to be "a planetary emergency"
Force others to be politically correct via control of money. And the thousands scientists, media and politicians make money by whoring and singing this political song, just ignore their conscience.

Politicians claim that they are the saviors and have saved us from certain doom, they get zillions to satisfy their spending lust and claim to be heroes.

A pretty good racket huh?

==

"No matter if the science is all phony, there [are] collateral environmental benefits...climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."

Christine Stewart,
Canadian Environment Minister,
Calgary Herald, December 14, 1998
http://www.mtmultipleuse.org/endangered/esahi...

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…

When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.”-

UN IPCC Japanese Scientist
Dr. Kiminori Itoh,
an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...

Czech-born U.S. climatologist
Dr. George Kukla,
a research scientist with the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University,

"...Why are some scientists worried? Perhaps because they feel that to stop worrying may mean to stop being paid,”

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...

==

Reid Bryson says global warming is “a bunch of hooey.” Is he a radical Right-winger? Is he a pro-business drone? No, he’s known as the father of scientific climatology.

“... there is no credible evidence that it is due to mankind and carbon dioxide.

“There is a lot of money to be made in this,” he added.“If you want to be an eminent scientist you have to have a lot of grad students and a lot of grants. You can’t get grants unless you say,‘Oh global warming, yes, yes, carbon dioxide.’”

“There is very little truth to what is being said and an awful lot of religion. It’s almost a religion. Where you have to believe in anthropogenic (or man-made) global warming or else you are nuts.”

http://www.dakotavoice.com/2007/06/father-of-...

==

World Climate Report editor Dr. Patrick J. Michaels has just written a book cataloging dozens of similar instances.

The reason is obvious.

The scientific community has a financial incentive to spout gloom and doom. Doing so generates oodles of money from our single sugar daddy, the federal government.

No one ever leverages billions out of or Nation’s Capital (the current annual outlay for “global change” research is $4 billion) unless they threaten the worst.

Then the political process takes credit for saving us from certain destruction.

And the media, addicted to “if it bleeds, it leads” stories, without questioning, print the worst.

Don’t expect scientific peer review to stop this process. To gain expert-review status, a scientist has to also have oodles of federally funded research. Who would rationally derail this gravy train?

All of which guarantees that my colleagues are going to continue to scream bloody climate murder with impunity.

It is simple economics interacting with politics, as evinced by unquestioningly published absolute nonsense.

http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2...

JRS wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe not "fake" but whores. Scientific whores. Whoring for the religion of global warming.
==
The lefties proclaim an imaginary problem to be "a planetary emergency"
Force others to be politically correct via control of money. And the thousands scientists, media and politicians make money by whoring and singing this political song, just ignore their conscience.
Politicians claim that they are the saviors and have saved us from certain doom, they get zillions to satisfy their spending lust and claim to be heroes.
A pretty good racket huh?
==
"No matter if the science is all phony, there [are] collateral environmental benefits...climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."
Christine Stewart,
Canadian Environment Minister,
Calgary Herald, December 14, 1998
http://www.mtmultipleuse.org/endangered/esahi...
Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…
When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.”-
UN IPCC Japanese Scientist
Dr. Kiminori Itoh,
an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...
Czech-born U.S. climatologist
Dr. George Kukla,
a research scientist with the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University,
"...Why are some scientists worried? Perhaps because they feel that to stop worrying may mean to stop being paid,”
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...
==
Reid Bryson says global warming is “a bunch of hooey.” Is he a radical Right-winger? Is he a pro-business drone? No, he’s known as the father of scientific climatology.
“... there is no credible evidence that it is due to mankind and carbon dioxide.
“There is a lot of money to be made in this,” he added.“If you want to be an eminent scientist you have to have a lot of grad students and a lot of grants. You can’t get grants unless you say,‘Oh global warming, yes, yes, carbon dioxide.’”
“There is very little truth to what is being said and an awful lot of religion. It’s almost a religion. Where you have to believe in anthropogenic (or man-made) global warming or else you are nuts.”
http://www.dakotavoice.com/2007/06/father-of-...
==
World Climate Report editor Dr. Patrick J. Michaels has just written a book cataloging dozens of similar instances.
The reason is obvious.
The scientific community has a financial incentive to spout gloom and doom. Doing so generates oodles of money from our single sugar daddy, the federal government.
No one ever leverages billions out of or Nation’s Capital (the current annual outlay for “global change” research is $4 billion) unless they threaten the worst.
Then the political process takes credit for saving us from certain destruction.
And the media, addicted to “if it bleeds, it leads” stories, without questioning, print the worst.
Don’t expect scientific peer review to stop this process. To gain expert-review status, a scientist has to also have oodles of federally funded research. Who would rationally derail this gravy train?
All of which guarantees that my colleagues are going to continue to scream bloody climate murder with impunity.
It is simple economics interacting with politics, as evinced by unquestioningly published absolute nonsense.
http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2...

religion of global warming? You sound like a lunatic. Talking with people like you is like talking to a wall but even less gratifying.

JRS wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe not "fake" but whores. Scientific whores. Whoring for the religion of global warming.....

No such thing. Doesn't exist.
Neither is there a religion of science. Doesn't exist.
You just don't understand. The evidence for some sort of global warming is overwhelming and conclusive. Read the papers.