Texas Defies Obama Admin., Bars Abortion Providers from Medicaid

Feb 24, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: New Media Journal

Texas on Thursday passed regulations barring Planned Parenthood clinics and other "affiliates of abortion providers" from participating in the state's Medicaid program starting March 14, the Texas Tribune is reporting.

Comments
1,401 - 1,420 of 2,814 Comments Last updated Sep 24, 2013

“The one who knows”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1455
May 26, 2012
 
The Streakster has returned.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1456
May 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

He's an obstetrician, not a neurologist. He repesents no peer-reviewed research that backs up his claim.

In the first trimester, the beginning of the medulla is developed to the point of governing some autonomic activities. But the upper brain simply is not present. in th4e second trimester, the upper brain is just starting to form, but without the neurons necessary to form any kind of consciousness. Only in the 6th month--not AT, but DURING--do those neurons and synapses begin to form. The simple fact is that the fetus is incapable of feeling anything beyond autonomic neural stimulation.

Do you not understand how anesthesia works? Chemicals cut the upper brain's ability to react to pain. it's not jut putting the patient to sleep but keeping the mind from recognizing the feeling of the scalpel slicing through nerves and flesh.

What's especially galling is that many physicians perform circumcisions without anesthesia because they believe the neonate cannot yet feel pain. So either they cannot--meaning the fetus cannot--or the fetus can, making childbirth a festival of agony.
PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>
So now you know more than a trained medical profession like Dr. Robert Siudmak. Dr. of Obstetrics and "former abortionist". You arrogant little penis head. You just won't admit that you are WRONG, and that's the bottom line.
And if you've seen these images, and Dr. Siudmak who aborted fetuses in him lifetime says a fetus has pain sensation at WEEK 12, which is at the end of the FIRST, and the beginning of the SECOND, TRIMESTER, then how can you jump up your ass and make the assertion a fetus feels no pain until the THIRD TRIMESTER?
Where did you study your REAL medical research, a Nazi death camp?
The mere fact you overstate the expeience of a professional, trained, educated, and certified medical practitioner, with a college degree, or two, in medicine, and a "former abortionist" practitioner who has performed far more abortions that you have, is indicative of how f---ing mentally sick you really are.
So, you are telling us you can look at these shredded bodies of children, who were butchered on "WHIM", and say as a self-promoting human being with "rights" to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, these fetuses had no rights to be protected?
I know what your answer is, and that is why I have no reason to be anything but in a loathing, abhorant, opposition to sick trash like you.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1457
May 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Yes, the process of life. GodDAMN, you need to smarten up.

If the law wishes to call something murder, they can. It doesn't make it correct terminology or scientifically valid. There in fact have been protests about the legal terminology used for FHL's, but no serious action because none of them actually act as giving a fetus rights.
UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny cause all the big heads were all excited because they found evidence of life on mars, in the form of microscopic things. I guess you better call them up and get them straight about all that!
Now you still have not explained to all of us lower people out here how it is possible to be charged with and convicted of murder for killing functional tumor.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1458
May 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

It is one thing to teach a child; it's quite different from controlling them. You can give your child the tools to make decisions, or you can just tell them what to do. The latter does not prepare them for the world.

First morgana and I were supposed to be the same person, and now we are siblings? Of course, you also think children can give consent to sex, so your outrage about incest is a little hollow. Everything about your posts rings hollow, like your skull.
PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>
A woman can choose to abort a baby because she has "control" over her own body. But if she chooses to have the child, according to you, she would be a abusive control freak if she to a mothers responsibility to excerise parental control over the child's well being. Please tell me you are not an educator?
Now since you accuse me a incest with a daughter, try this on for size. Your brother had consensual sex with this person, whether he is a priest or not is questionable. In fact this brother is like Petey, and he was born defective, in his sexuality. So, wallow in you anger towards the person who deflowered your brother and quit pissing on our shoes.
Wrong again about my divorse. That all I need to say on that matter. Unlike you, I don't go around gushing forth with hate I don't have.
Poor drunk woman? That doesn't sound like a woman liberator, attacking another woman she wants us to believe she defends to the hilt, and a daughter who is obviously a woman.
Sounds more like a fag disguised as a bitch to me.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1459
May 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Sounds like your masturbatory fantasies. At least the ones that don't involve kids giving consent.
PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>
UR, note who the posters are that are grammar cops? Now isn't it amazing that one's posting the same grammar rhetoric that the 'other' is also posting? Me thinks the two are one-and-the-same. The fag in drag. M9's avatar, as Petey likes to refer to it as, is a photo him in drag. Yaba, daba, do.
PATRIOT

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1460
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
He's an obstetrician, not a neurologist. He repesents no peer-reviewed research that backs up his claim.
In the first trimester, the beginning of the medulla is developed to the point of governing some autonomic activities. But the upper brain simply is not present. in th4e second trimester, the upper brain is just starting to form, but without the neurons necessary to form any kind of consciousness. Only in the 6th month--not AT, but DURING--do those neurons and synapses begin to form. The simple fact is that the fetus is incapable of feeling anything beyond autonomic neural stimulation.
Do you not understand how anesthesia works? Chemicals cut the upper brain's ability to react to pain. it's not jut putting the patient to sleep but keeping the mind from recognizing the feeling of the scalpel slicing through nerves and flesh.
What's especially galling is that many physicians perform circumcisions without anesthesia because they believe the neonate cannot yet feel pain. So either they cannot--meaning the fetus cannot--or the fetus can, making childbirth a festival of agony.
<quoted text>
You are not an obstetrician, you are not a neurologist. You are not a member of any medical peer-group who has investigated, nor participated in, abortions. You, in fact have no factual information from any research you, or any other militant fag has done that can refute Dr. Robert Siudmak's experinece, observations, and education where it relates to abortions. You are a follower in drag, not an empiracal authority on anything. Not even perserving a sexual relationship with another man. And with the reversals that are taking place in the area of so-called 'gay rights', you are obvioulsy not a very effective adovacate.

But you are the baby killer that you are.
PATRIOT

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1461
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
It is one thing to teach a child; it's quite different from controlling them. You can give your child the tools to make decisions, or you can just tell them what to do. The latter does not prepare them for the world.
First morgana and I were supposed to be the same person, and now we are siblings? Of course, you also think children can give consent to sex, so your outrage about incest is a little hollow. Everything about your posts rings hollow, like your skull.
<quoted text>
You and her brother are not, and were not victims. You both entered into sexual relationships with men of your own free will. Porbably because no female would have anything to do with the two of you. Hell, your mother tried to dump you at the bus stop a couple of times, but the ID chip in you asses kept bringing you back.(Now I know you are just chomping at the sausage to fire back that chips weren't around when the two of you were little fags. It's just taken a long time for mom to ditch your asses).

You sure know a lot about 'child consent' to having sex with an adult, since you are the first to bring it up. Like the saying goes, "the smeller's the feller".
PATRIOT

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1462
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
Sounds like your masturbatory fantasies. At least the ones that don't involve kids giving consent.
<quoted text>
There again, you tip your true status. You are doing a lot of masterbation lately since your breakup, failed relationship, are you not? It's like doing it 'with one hand while you type', another tip as to who is who in the mini-series of your baby killer motif.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1463
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

The peer-reviewed research contradicts your source, and he has shown nothing that backs him up. What I pointed out is
FROM the peer-reviewed research.

It's hilarious to see you try to provoke me, because you can't. Since gay rights, including SSM, are proceeding apace, you can't even offer a realistic insult.

On the other hand, your spending you time here while fetuses get hoovered shows how ineffectual you are.
PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not an obstetrician, you are not a neurologist. You are not a member of any medical peer-group who has investigated, nor participated in, abortions. You, in fact have no factual information from any research you, or any other militant fag has done that can refute Dr. Robert Siudmak's experinece, observations, and education where it relates to abortions. You are a follower in drag, not an empiracal authority on anything. Not even perserving a sexual relationship with another man. And with the reversals that are taking place in the area of so-called 'gay rights', you are obvioulsy not a very effective adovacate.
But you are the baby killer that you are.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1464
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

I never claimed to be a victim. You are saying that her brother, a minor, gave consent to sex. So you can't even follow your own argument.

Your support for molestation is duly noted.
PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>
You and her brother are not, and were not victims. You both entered into sexual relationships with men of your own free will. Porbably because no female would have anything to do with the two of you. Hell, your mother tried to dump you at the bus stop a couple of times, but the ID chip in you asses kept bringing you back.(Now I know you are just chomping at the sausage to fire back that chips weren't around when the two of you were little fags. It's just taken a long time for mom to ditch your asses).
You sure know a lot about 'child consent' to having sex with an adult, since you are the first to bring it up. Like the saying goes, "the smeller's the feller".

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1465
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Flil away, little man. I have no lack of male companionship when the mood strikes me.
PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>
There again, you tip your true status. You are doing a lot of masterbation lately since your breakup, failed relationship, are you not? It's like doing it 'with one hand while you type', another tip as to who is who in the mini-series of your baby killer motif.

Since: Feb 12

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1466
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
Yes, the process of life. GodDAMN, you need to smarten up.
If the law wishes to call something murder, they can. It doesn't make it correct terminology or scientifically valid. There in fact have been protests about the legal terminology used for FHL's, but no serious action because none of them actually act as giving a fetus rights.
<quoted text>
But you said flat out that cells were not life!
Contradicting yourself again here.
Your attempt at justification of the murder of innocents is lame.
You still have not and can not justify ho one person can be convicted of murder for doing the same thing another person can do at whim.
As to rights well how about you explain how something that is not human, has no life, and has no rights of any type, as you claim, can even be murdered?
Now prior to you ranting on again about dogs etc. Show me one person that has ever been conicted of murder for killing someone elses dog.
It is not me that needs to, as you put it, "Smarten up" it is you. You openly support a practice that is a contradiction and then try to demean another that points this out to you. Try as you might you can not justify this hypocricy.

Since: Feb 12

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1467
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
The peer-reviewed research contradicts your source, and he has shown nothing that backs him up. What I pointed out is
FROM the peer-reviewed research.
It's hilarious to see you try to provoke me, because you can't. Since gay rights, including SSM, are proceeding apace, you can't even offer a realistic insult.
On the other hand, your spending you time here while fetuses get hoovered shows how ineffectual you are.
<quoted text>
Don't know what you consider apace but there are a number of states that had approved ssm and have now repealed it. So not sure about that whole apace thing.

“Freedom is never free”

Since: Jan 09

El Paso, Texas

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1468
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Here's the utter stupidity in what CPeter is stating...

I said a single cell is life. He said it wasn't and yet I'd have to believe that he is a steadfast supporter of evolution and if so then at some point he believes that an amoeba began life as we know it.

So a single cell amoeba is life, but a multicellular organism, an embryo, isn't life.

That contradiction is freaking huge, but I never did expect someone who 1) doesn't know the law and 2) obviously know science to have any idea about what they were talking about.

CPeter continue to post in ignorance. You are truly excelling in that endeavor.
PATRIOT

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1469
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
The peer-reviewed research contradicts your source, and he has shown nothing that backs him up. What I pointed out is
FROM the peer-reviewed research.
It's hilarious to see you try to provoke me, because you can't. Since gay rights, including SSM, are proceeding apace, you can't even offer a realistic insult.
On the other hand, your spending you time here while fetuses get hoovered shows how ineffectual you are.
<quoted text>
What peer-review groups, name them? What research reports, name their titles?

You are so full of arrogant shit it's coming out of you mouth, nose, and ears. You spout off without backing it up with any cites.
You are supposed to so f---ing intelligent and you can't even cite your sources. No doubt you went to some junior college for fags on the taxpayers dime, because you just can't cut it when it comes to being questioned. No wonder cops beat the crap out of your ilk to get your attention, baby killer.
PATRIOT

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1470
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
I never claimed to be a victim. You are saying that her brother, a minor, gave consent to sex. So you can't even follow your own argument.
Your support for molestation is duly noted.
<quoted text>
You would be close to being right if the "brother" existed. But he is another one of the figmented phantoms, like Vlad the Jabber. You are now going to try to argue with a myth-some 'thing'you and your alter-ego created as if you are trying to lay claim to the legitimacy of your bs arguments. Don't even go there, baby killer.

There is no MOOgana, the pasture queen and there is no molested little brother. Hell, I'm not even sure there is a you. I might wake up any minute and find out you are nothing more than a sticky wet dream/nightmare combined.

You are just not that smart, you are so stupid. You are also a gay bigot who has no reason to ever call anybody else names, or condemn anybody else for their beliefs. In other words, you are NOTHING-but a baby killer.
PATRIOT

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1471
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
Flil away, little man. I have no lack of male companionship when the mood strikes me.
<quoted text>
You arrogant, pompous little asswipe. The only reason you have no lack for male companionship is due to the street corner and alley you use for business being just a block away from your dump.

Is "Flil" a new word you invented to show retards how intelligent you aren't?

"Flil", is why nobody believes a "Fliling" thing you post. And That's a "Flact".
hwyangel

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1472
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ken Johnson, a 10 year veteran of the Seattle Fire Department, wanted to be a father, but with the right woman, and at the right time. Three years ago he and his wife separated after six years of marriage, and each began to date. During this time, according to court documents filed in Snohomish County, Washington, Ken had a brief affair with "Cathy," which resulted in a pregnancy.

Ken's legal complaint alleges that he begged Cathy to put the child up for adoption or to terminate the pregnancy, but Cathy refused. Now Ken and his wife, who reconciled two and a half years ago, can't start a family of their own because almost half of Ken's net income from the Seattle Fire Department goes to support the child he didn't want to have. He says, "People tell me that Cathy should have the choice whether to keep the child or not because it's her body so it's her choice. I agree. But what about my body? I make my living rushing into burning buildings. I put my life and my safety on the line every time I go to work, and now I'm on the hook for 18 years. With the child support demands on me, there's no way I'll ever be able to quit. What about my choice?
If it's a womans "choice" then should men be expected to finance their choice?

“The one who knows”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1473
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>
You arrogant, pompous little asswipe. The only reason you have no lack for male companionship is due to the street corner and alley you use for business being just a block away from your dump.
Is "Flil" a new word you invented to show retards how intelligent you aren't?
"Flil", is why nobody believes a "Fliling" thing you post. And That's a "Flact".
I swear, Pete is so pompous, he makes me laugh so hard I have to "flart".

“Freedom is never free”

Since: Jan 09

El Paso, Texas

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1474
May 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

justice is just a choice wrote:
Here's the utter stupidity in what CPeter is stating...
I said a single cell is life. He said it wasn't and yet I'd have to believe that he is a steadfast supporter of evolution and if so then at some point he believes that an amoeba began life as we know it.
So a single cell amoeba is life, but a multicellular organism, an embryo, isn't life.
That contradiction is freaking huge, but I never did expect someone who 1) doesn't know the law and 2) obviously know science to have any idea about what they were talking about.
CPeter continue to post in ignorance. You are truly excelling in that endeavor.
Oops misplaced "doesn't" to complete 2) obviously doesn't know science.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••