Obama Invokes God, Conservatives Cry Foul

bappie wrote:

<quoted text>No, jackarse, I am not, you are! You all act like the German people when Hitler took power. All he had to do was to appeal to the bigotery of the German people towards Jews. Hate is appealing, isn't it? They fell lock stop into his propaganda and we all know how that turned out, don't we?

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Aren't you a good little sheep.

Dingo wrote:

seem pretty close to you bedtime.
.
here you go.
.
http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/8480/binki...
<quoted text>

Judged:

2

2

1

Drop Those Ropes Boys_ wrote:

A vote for Obama, Is a Vote well spent!

brad wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you actually suggesting that Bush had specific knowledge

Judged:

1

1

1

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Presidential Briefing:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB116...
WAH WAH WAH! MOMMY! Barefoot keeps using real sources! WAHHHH!

Dont go there wrote:

<quoted text>
Yet you can't name a single one.
Congrats on that! And, as always, thanks for the baseless republican talking point.

Judged:

1

1

1

brad wrote:

<quoted text>
Everything is speculation,including assuming Bush did nothing with Al Qaeda intel.
Bwaaa,,,

Look at the Catholic contraception issue that is going on now.Say one thing back off do the same thing a different way.

Lionel Heavener wrote:

<quoted text>
Look at the Catholic contraception issue that is going on now.Say one thing back off do the same thing a different way.
The pipeline,he says we need jobs but no on the pipeline.
That is two.These are not baseless.
As far as republican talking point.
RepubliCONS and DemocRATS are one in the same.They will tell you one thing to your face and do the opposite once they get into office.
As long as I have voted the people have been left with the lesser of two evils in the election.It will be the same again this year.

Judged:

1

1

1

Dingo wrote:

What did you just say?
.
code?
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

mdbuilder wrote:

<quoted text>
Prior knowledge, huh Bigtoe? This whole thing, the World Trade Center attack, it appears, was the result of Slick Willy's half-assed 1998 cowardly attack on Bin Ladin's camp in Afghanistan. That ILLEGAL attack became THE great motivator and enlistment tool for Bin Ladin's terrorist group. Clinton's aggressively overt attack on a friendly, sovereign nation - without warning - was the defining reason for the 9/11 attack.
Does that sound about right Bigmouth? One more thing, this small bit at the end of your "source":
"We have NOT BEEN ABLE TO CORROBORATE some of the more sensational threat reporting such as that from a ---------service in 1998 saying that Bin Ladin wanted to hijack a US aircraft...."

Judged:

1

1

1

brad wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow!
You've taken hook,line and sinker to a level that now includes rod,reel,boat,lake and fisherman.
You're actually living in Obamas belly.LOL
Bwaaa,,,

Judged:

1

1

1

mdbuilder wrote:

<quoted text>
Prior knowledge, huh Bigtoe? This whole thing, the World Trade Center attack, it appears, was the result of Slick Willy's half-assed 1998 cowardly attack on Bin Ladin's camp in Afghanistan.

Judged:

1

1

1

MyKidsMom wrote:

<quoted text>
And just for the record, here's Jefferson's Letter of Separation:
Gentlemen
The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.[Congress thus inhibited from acts respecting religion, and the Executive authorised only to execute their acts, I have refrained from prescribing even those occasional performances of devotion, practiced indeed by the Executive of another nation as the legal head of its church, but subject here, as religious exercises only to the voluntary regulations and discipline of each respective sect.] Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association assurances of my high respect & esteem.
(signed) Thomas Jefferson
Jan.1.1802.
You don't have to tilt your head and squint your eyes to understand what Jefferson meant, and how it relates to the First Amendment.

Judged:

1

1

1

MyKidsMom wrote:

<quoted text>
I submitted this on post 1522..and someone marked as SPAM.
Too funny.
Jefferson's letter of separation to the church, WORD FOR WORD.
The right-wing non-thinkers on the forum either can't read or can't think.
Last year Rick Perry supported efforts in his state to re-write public school textbooks to omit references in American history that don't support the conservative agenda, including Jefferson's letter of separation.
I don't like using words like stupid, moron or idiot..but it's hard to describe modern the republican party without using them.

Judged:

1

1

1

Dingo wrote:

You sound like a useful idiot, here, try to catch up.
.
http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/350/clarke...
.
don't forget check the date...
.
.
and a good day to you
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
The attack to most people appears to be an attack on the USA by Bin Laden for the deployment of US troops on Arab land.
Read much?
And you asked for proof of prior knowledge and I gave you the brief Bush got **when he was on vacation**(again) in Texas a month before the attack.
And the Bush administration (including Rice) pooh-poohed the warnings Clinton gave them in January when Bush took over.
PS: "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)

Judged:

1

1

1

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Presidential Briefing:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB116...
WAH WAH WAH! MOMMY! Barefoot keeps using real sources! WAHHHH!

Judged:

1

1

1

mdbuilder wrote:

<quoted text>
You are a useless idiot. Be that as it may, this document illustrates how much Clinton's attack incensed Bin Ladin's organization and other terrorist groups throughout the Middle East. Al Qaeda grew exponentially after the 1998 attack and became the global threat that eventually "got even". If only Clinton had tried diplomacy, the whole sordid mess would have been averted.
..and a good day to you.