Supreme Court hands President Obama a major victory on health care

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama isn't required to show his college records.
But then, who cares about college records?
Romney insists that he paid taxes, where I am from, Bro-Job, if you make a claim, you should be able to back it up.
Presidential candidates have made tax returns available for inspection for quite some time- even Willard's dad posted 12 years of tax returns when he ran. Obama & Biden posted 10 years
CLEARLY: Mittens is hiding something.
Did he not pay anything in tax returns- as many of the rich?
And the Democrats are going to continue to have a field day with it.

Where you're from, you don't pay taxes.

None of you CK SKRS do.

If your monkey has proof that Romney has broken the law, he has the power to have him arrested.

The fact that your monkey has produced no proof, shows that he is simply trying to distract from his own dismal record.

Your monkey isn't qualified to do anything but be the welfare, ghetto, low life CK SKER that he is.

Just like you.

oblamer= food stamp pres. 8.3 unemployment, more like 15.7

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama isn't required to show his college records.
But then, who cares about college records?
Romney insists that he paid taxes, where I am from, Bro-Job, if you make a claim, you should be able to back it up.
Presidential candidates have made tax returns available for inspection for quite some time- even Willard's dad posted 12 years of tax returns when he ran. Obama & Biden posted 10 years
CLEARLY: Mittens is hiding something.
Did he not pay anything in tax returns- as many of the rich?
And the Democrats are going to continue to have a field day with it.

Let me explain it as slowly as i can?
Obamas College records are not why they
are buried/hidden/suppressed?? Its his
Connections that are related to those
papers that he and his handlers decided
would cause him to not be elected?? Can
you imagine how bad they must be?? To
spend Millions on Supressing them,Tells
you right away? So most thinking people
are very curious to see how/why they got
Royally Screwed when they voted for or
against the POTUS?? Got it now???
Lets start with did the NOI,Via a Saudi
Prince pay for his education?? Therefore
he is lying when he states.Yeah I understand
you Guys (Addressing Students repeatedly)
how it is to have to pay back student loans
#1?? And of Course,the Thesis,From Harvard
Occidental,Columbia?? et al??? Was he a
Affirmative Action Recipient??? And all
the multitude of questions that all the
previous POTUS have answered/revealed????

frank wrote:

oblamer= food stamp pres. 8.3 unemployment, more like 15.7

Bush got the ball rolling with serveral unemployment extension, 3 in total I believe.

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>Bush got the ball rolling with serveral unemployment extension, 3 in total I believe.

Bush has been out of office for 4 years. When does "oblamer" become responsible...

frank wrote:

<quoted text>
Bush has been out of office for 4 years. When does "oblamer" become responsible...

I know what your saying there too, because if you look at history especially during the Great Depression FDR didnt get it the economy going in his first term either but FDR never really got the economy going until excessive government spending which was because of WW2 which in terms meant high deficit spending which we cant afford and Obama, Congress & Bernanke know very well and all three are involved by law because of the Humphrey–Hawkins Full Employment Act since the Act sought to formalize (and to expand Congress's role in) the economic policy process, as governed by the Federal Reserve and the President since it used to be that the country's economic policy had been defined by the Employment Act of 1946, which encouraged & placed the federal government to pursue "maximum employment, production, and purchasing power" through cooperation with private enterprise. Some Congressmen, dissatisfied with the vague wording of this act, sought to create an amendment that would strengthen and clarify the country's economic policy which became the Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act.

Humphrey–Hawkins Full Employment Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_Employment_...

FDR had very little to do with the economy ever getting better.

Unemployment stayed very high up until WW2.

Which of course was the biggest stimulus package in American history.

Nearly all young men fighting a war and many women working for the war effort.

The following is an archived video story. The text content of that video story is available below for reference. The original video has been deleted and is no longer available.

Religious Group Threatens to Pull Support for Obama

President Obama is facing sharp criticism tonight form a group that was among his biggest supporters. A coalition of African-American pastors is upset with the President's support for gay marriage. This group of pastors held a news conference at Opryland to voice its disapproval with the President's position. Several pastors say they believe the the President is leading the country down a dangerous path.

"His pronouncement is in fact a direct attack on the God of the Bible and the Christian faith," says Quinn Chapel AME's Luke Robinson.

"We were once proud of you, but our pride has turned to shame that you, the man holding the most powerful position in the world, would stoop to leading the country down an immoral path," says the Coalition of African-American Pastors' Bill Owens.

The group is now calling on black pastors across the country to withhold support from President Obama in the November election.

OOps Enjoy the trip??? Potus,Well the idiots here in
the WH,Told me Chief we need those Gay votes,things
have changed? I cannot do another GD Flip-Flop,they
will call me a Beach Boy if i do any more of em????

BRONACH wrote:

FDR had very little to do with the economy ever getting better.
Unemployment stayed very high up until WW2.
Which of course was the biggest stimulus package in American history.
Nearly all young men fighting a war and many women working for the war effort.

I agree.

frank wrote:

<quoted text>Bush has been out of office for 4 years. When does "oblamer" become responsible...

Both parties are responsible but you somehow believe that government is run by ONE PERSON when we have a THREE BRANCH GOVERNMENT.

Mykro wrote:

<quoted text>No. It's actually the planet Kolob.

Well, Well, Now we have two candidates, one from Kolob?? and one from Kenya, one being make believe, and one being an actual place? Keep it up Micro, you're falling behind??

Nation of Imbeciles wrote:

<quoted text>
Both parties are responsible but you somehow believe that government is run by ONE PERSON when we have a THREE BRANCH GOVERNMENT.

I agree when you say that both parties are responsible and when you say the government is run by one person that would be Ben Bernanke even Alan Greenspan proved that how he could influence Government & economical activity.

BRONACH wrote:

FDR had very little to do with the economy ever getting better.
Unemployment stayed very high up until WW2.
Which of course was the biggest stimulus package in American history.
Nearly all young men fighting a war and many women working for the war effort.

I do believe the consensus opinion is that the GD OFFICIALLY ended in 1947... two years AFTER WWII and the year following the Rep's taking back the Congress and effectively ENDING the New Deal's going nowhere policies. sorta like the current Admin's (barely) maintain but go nowhere policies. Obama is FDR/Wilson times TEN.
the real solution is the one used to end the recession of '21-'22 (post WWI) and brought forth the Roaring Twenties: BOTH tax and spending reductions over several years.
less IS better

higgans wrote:

<quoted text>
I do believe the consensus opinion is that the GD OFFICIALLY ended in 1947... two years AFTER WWII and the year following the Rep's taking back the Congress and effectively ENDING the New Deal's going nowhere policies. sorta like the current Admin's (barely) maintain but go nowhere policies. Obama is FDR/Wilson times TEN.
the real solution is the one used to end the recession of '21-'22 (post WWI) and brought forth the Roaring Twenties: BOTH tax and spending reductions over several years.
less IS better

I agree!

"Banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than 20 standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." -- Thomas Jefferson

higgans wrote:

<quoted text>
I do believe the consensus opinion is that the GD OFFICIALLY ended in 1947... two years AFTER WWII and the year following the Rep's taking back the Congress and effectively ENDING the New Deal's going nowhere policies. sorta like the current Admin's (barely) maintain but go nowhere policies. Obama is FDR/Wilson times TEN.
the real solution is the one used to end the recession of '21-'22 (post WWI) and brought forth the Roaring Twenties: BOTH tax and spending reductions over several years.
less IS better

Roaring Twenties under President Calvin Coolidge is equivilant to the Clinton Era along with the deregulation by the so called Conservatives and their "Contract with America" which gave the conditions that lead up to the 2008 financial crisis thinking the markets would regulate themselves which they proved again the need of a regulator.

BRONACH wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree!
"Banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than 20 standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." -- Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson is right that is the goal of Capitalism and preferred Socialism what Karl Marxs describes as economical systems.

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>Thomas Jefferson is right that is the goal of Capitalism and preferred Socialism what Karl Marxs describes as economical systems.

Not sure I understand your comment.

You aren't saying Jefferson was a socialist,are you?

Not trying to start an argument, but I'm very confident he wasn't.

"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it." -- Thomas Jefferson

Razors Edge wrote:

The following is an archived video story. The text content of that video story is available below for reference. The original video has been deleted and is no longer available.
Religious Group Threatens to Pull Support for Obama
President Obama is facing sharp criticism tonight form a group that was among his biggest supporters. A coalition of African-American pastors is upset with the President's support for gay marriage. This group of pastors held a news conference at Opryland to voice its disapproval with the President's position. Several pastors say they believe the the President is leading the country down a dangerous path.
"His pronouncement is in fact a direct attack on the God of the Bible and the Christian faith," says Quinn Chapel AME's Luke Robinson.
"We were once proud of you, but our pride has turned to shame that you, the man holding the most powerful position in the world, would stoop to leading the country down an immoral path," says the Coalition of African-American Pastors' Bill Owens.
The group is now calling on black pastors across the country to withhold support from President Obama in the November election.
OOps Enjoy the trip??? Potus,Well the idiots here in
the WH,Told me Chief we need those Gay votes,things
have changed? I cannot do another GD Flip-Flop,they
will call me a Beach Boy if i do any more of em????

Their skin color and democrat party line voter mentality will prove too much for them to kick their black President to the curb.

They'll vote him Obama no matter how incompetent he is, no matter how much he lies, no matter how much debt he puts this country into, no matter how much he ignores the black unemployment rate. The blacks will vote to keep Obama in office because he's anti America and anti white. Those are good enough reasons for them.

BRONACH wrote:

<quoted text>
Not sure I understand your comment.
You aren't saying Jefferson was a socialist,are you?
Not trying to start an argument, but I'm very confident he wasn't.
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it." -- Thomas Jefferson

yeap jefferson was a socialist according to Marxs so was Lincoln.

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>yeap jefferson was a socialist according to Marxs so was Lincoln.

Really?

Marx is the one who decides that Jefferson was a socialist?

I wonder why Jefferson never wrote anything to support that ridiculous claim.

Marx?

LOL

And you believe Marx over Jefferson?