|
Since: Aug 07
South Central Virginia
|
Please wait...
Earthling-1 wrote: NobodyYouEverWantToKnow, alias:
<quoted text>Having a bad day, Mr Undoubtably Spelt Fourty?
Still unable to find any evidence of CO2 as a thermal pollutant?
Please tell me you've stopped thinking that 'epistemologists' compile dictionaries?
Have you managed to work out the real meaning of a PoP forecast yet?
Did you ever find one shred of evidence that forty was ever spelt with a U within the last 200 years? I agree with him here. You are busy spreading gossip based on a political document instead of the truth in the science. BTW: For historical use, the IPCC documents have consistently UNDERESTIMATED how bad things are.
|
|
SpaceBlues
Houston, TX
|
okboston wrote: <quoted text>
Shocking, Shocking I tell you. How could anyone, anyone at all look at a politicized document such as an IPCC report and think it would be accurate. And a PROFESSOR of all things was surprised that a political document MIGHT contain scientific inaccuracies.
What the heck is he a professor of.......English?
The real question is why did he not look at the underlying scientific research if he wanted accurate, non-political material in order to base an educated opinion?
On the other hand, he has you spreading the word about sorry his research is considering he based it on a political instead of a scientific document. I'm pretty certain he was shown a draft report. Draft copies are made to be reviewed, commented, and finalized. I guess he has not been publishing with others to know what it takes. A tedious process. LOL.
|
|
litesong
Everett, WA
|
piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger dirtling wrote: Right what?
What right? That's right. He doesn't know right. But "piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger dirtling" does know slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate racist rooting (& rotting) pukey proud pigisms.
|
|
litesong
Everett, WA
|
piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger dirtling wrote: Northie wants to see..... But "piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger dirtling" wants to see people racially.... & does.
|
|
litesong
Everett, WA
|
okboston wrote: Why did the right turn away from science and economics?
Global Warming
Creationism
Evolution
6000 year old earth
etc.... It is important to know that: mathematics & science degreed scientists who are repubs, do NOT comprise even 35% of the science community.
|
|
“Be true to yourself.”
Since: Oct 10
Mountain hideaway, Spain
|
Please wait...
okboston wrote: What the heck is he a professor of.......English? A typical alarmist, commenting on something without knowing the details.
|
|
“dening those who deny nature. ”
Since: Jun 07
Norfolk va
|
Please wait...
LessHypeMoreFact wrote: <quoted text>
Of course he isn't alone. Two facts prove this.
First, there are always plenty of people below average IQ.
Second, there are always plenty of nuts and conspiracy theorists. In fact, they far exceed demand..
Just the fact that you are here proves that he is not alone in either his ignorance or his paranoia. Usually there are half below the average and half above. After all it is an average and research has shown that the IQ test itself leaves much to be desired. And of course there are plenty of nuts and conspiracy theorist. Your a perfect example of such. Normally they have to have a big scary villian be it a super secret goverment agency with black choppers or Big Oil suppressing the truth. All have to be the work of an intelligent agency be it human or alien and of course it cannot be the work of nature.
|
|
“dening those who deny nature. ”
Since: Jun 07
Norfolk va
|
Please wait...
LessHypeMoreFact wrote: <quoted text>
Well if you really are SURE..
<quoted text>
Here you are fantasizing beyond the facts.
In fact, if you ask their chief climatologist (the man responsible for climate research at NASA, one Dr. James Hansen, I am sure he will call you on it. I personally cannot think of any NASA study that denies the evidence of AGW so I suspect that this is your own spin and nothing more. Why would I bother asking the administrator James Hansen when I can ask those who actually are doing the research. As for AGW, that has already been disproved with more peer reviewed research being published every day. But if you have to fantasize that AGW is still viable then sooner or later it will fall apart. And I sure you could not think of any NASA study that proves you wrong. After all, why would you bother to look for anything like information like that. Or even acknowledge that it exists. Then you would have to admit that you and Dr Hansen might be wrong and then where would you be.
|
|
|
Patriot AKA Bozo
San Marcos, TX
|
tina anne wrote: <quoted text>
Why would I bother asking the administrator James Hansen when I can ask those who actually are doing the research. As for AGW, that has already been disproved with more peer reviewed research being published every day.
But if you have to fantasize that AGW is still viable then sooner or later it will fall apart. And I sure you could not think of any NASA study that proves you wrong. After all, why would you bother to look for anything like information like that. Or even acknowledge that it exists. Then you would have to admit that you and Dr Hansen might be wrong and then where would you be. Still spreading the RW gospel I see!
|
|
“Be true to yourself.”
Since: Oct 10
Mountain hideaway, Spain
|
Please wait...
Political Bozo wrote: Still spreading the RW gospel I see! It's all politics with you Yankees.
|
|
LessHypeMoreFact
Toronto, Canada
|
okboston wrote: <quoted text>
What the heck is he a professor of.......English? Well, the one is a chemist and the other is a geologist. I am sure they are very bright people that know lots of things. Just not climate science. Otoh, they don't KNOW how clueless they are. They take the accolades from the research they ARE good at and think it qualifies them to speak on ANY science issue. Real scientists know you are only an authority on your RESEARCH studies.
|
|
LessHypeMoreFact
Toronto, Canada
|
Earthling-1 wrote: <quoted text>A typical alarmist, commenting on something without knowing the details. So, Dirtling. Do YOU know the 'details'? Of COURSE you don't. You don't even recognise sarcasm! For which you don't need the specifics anyway. But to 'counter' it, you should have posted the long list of their climate researches. If you LOOK, of course, you won't find any. But then that would mean you actually looked. When are YOU going to become informed? Next year? Never?
|
|
LessHypeMoreFact
Toronto, Canada
|
Earthling-1 wrote: <quoted text>It's all politics with you Yankees. And when are YOU going to start dealing with facts instead of rhetoric and politics? Still don't know who Rush Limbaugh is, do you? You take PRIDE in not understanding EITHER science or politics. For you it is about the mud slinging, taunting, nit picking, etc.
|
|
“Be true to yourself.”
Since: Oct 10
Mountain hideaway, Spain
|
Please wait...
NobodyYouEverWantToKnow, alias: LessFactMoreHype wrote: So, Dirtling. Do YOU know the 'details'? Of COURSE you don't. You're right, but I do know for sure that you don't don't either, Mr Undoubtably Spelt Fourty. NoFactAllHype wrote: You don't even recognise sarcasm! Something else you learned from me, well done! NoFactAllHype wrote: For which you don't need the specifics anyway. You don't have those to offer. NoFactAllHype wrote: But to 'counter' it, you should have posted the long list of their climate researches. Why don't you post the long list of your climate research? NoFactAllHype wrote: If you LOOK, of course, you won't find any. But then that would mean you actually looked. When are YOU going to become informed? Next year? Never? Probably when you do, Mr Undoubtably Spelt Fourty.
|
|
litesong
Everett, WA
|
[QUOTE who=""steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger dirtling""]It's all politics with you Yankees.[/QUOTE] For me, its all about publicizing that "steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger dirtling" is a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate racist rooting(& rotting) pukey proud pig.
|
|
litesong
Everett, WA
|
okboston wrote: Why did the right turn away from science and economics? Global Warming Creationism Evolution 6000 year old earth ////////// litesong wrote: It is important to know that: mathematics & science degreed scientists who are repubs, do NOT comprise even 35% of the science community. ////////// litesong wrote: All the negative icons I received, mean that topix AGW denier repubs don't like the knowledge that 'repubs do NOT comprise even 35% of the science community', understood by others. It seems that repubs, who worked so little to be scientists & mathematicians, should be rewarded for their little efforts.
|
|
“Be true to yourself.”
Since: Oct 10
Mountain hideaway, Spain
|
Please wait...
NobodyYouEverWantToKnow, alias: LessFactMoreHype wrote: And when are YOU going to start dealing with facts instead of rhetoric and politics? I've been trying to deal with facts for a couple of years with you, but all I get back is bafflegab. NoFactAllHype wrote: Still don't know who Rush Limbaugh is, do you? Why would I? NoFactAllHype wrote: You take PRIDE in not understanding EITHER science or politics. Excuse me, you just told me I deal in "rhetoric and politics." Make your mind up? NoFactAllHype wrote: For you it is about the mud slinging, taunting, nit picking, etc. So why make it so easy for me, Mr Undoubtably Spelt Fourty, telling me that CO2 is a thermal pollutant?
|
|
“dening those who deny nature. ”
Since: Jun 07
Norfolk va
|
Please wait...
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote: <quoted text>
Still spreading the RW gospel I see! What, that Hansen is now an admin type. If you mean by spreading the RW gospel by point out the facts then yes. If pointing out that people like you when you use the term RW gospel that the purpose of man made climate change is political and not scientific then yes. After all, why would you need to use such a term if you yourself did not think of it as a political discussion.
|
|
Since: Aug 07
South Central Virginia
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
litesong wrote: <quoted text>
It is important to know that:
mathematics & science degreed scientists who are repubs, do NOT comprise even 35% of the science community. I would think that even less would admit it. Can you imagine them with a group of their Republican "friends" saying "No really, AGW is real, its happening. REALLY!"
|
|
Since: Aug 07
South Central Virginia
|
Please wait...
Earthling-1 wrote: <quoted text>A typical alarmist, commenting on something without knowing the details. Hey, a four year old can find "errors" in an IPCC report. It is the underlying scientific data that is a little more difficult. So who cares about someone finding errors in an IPCC report. It is a POLITICAL document.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|
Libra
